• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Abortion is a highly controversial topics, everyone has an opinion on it, whether you are pro life, pro-choice, or even Judis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Examine and comment on a philosophical approach to the moral and religious issues raised by the practice of abortion. Abortion is a highly controversial topic, everyone has an opinion on it, whether you are pro life, pro-choice, or even Judis Jarvis Thompson. Abortion is very controversial because opinions have changed some women value their career more than having a child, or they feel sex is more about enjoyment rather than passing on the family genes, but there are still people that feel that a foetus is a potential life and killing it is just the same as murder. Therefore having an abortion is the same as murder. If we look at the moral perspectives on abortion you have two very different ends of the scale. One being pro life where the baby's life is valued and pro choice, where the women's decision is valued for whatever reason she chooses to have an abortion. If we look at pro life views we know that they are opposed to the deliberate ending of any innocent's life from the first moment of its existence, conception. It is scientifically established that from the moment of conception, when a single-cell embryo is created, a new human being and or organism exists, a potential life has been created. To terminate the life of this individual is fundamentally unjust and discriminatory. To deprive an entity of his/her life, on the basis of qualities such as size or level of development is to contend that it is these qualities which give the entity the right to life. Pro life believers take the position that every human being has an inherent right to life, by virtue of being human: no-one has the right to deliberately bring about the death of an innocent human being. If you were to kill a child it would be considered murder, they believe that killing a foetus is the exact same thing, as a foetus is just the beginning of a child. ...read more.

Middle

Now if we look at a religious viewpoint we can see that religion is generally against abortion as they believe that abortion in its simplest form is just murder, it's the taking of an innocents life. Different religions have slightly different views. For example Islam states that under no circumstances should abortion be allowed but with Christianity it could be interpreted that abortion is allowed but before the foetus has a soul. If we look closer at Christianity we already know that they have mainly the same belief system where they both generally believe in the sanctity of life, sanctity means 'the quality of being sacred or holy.' So the sanctity of life must mean that every human life is sacred so the this means that every human life and every potential human life is scared and cannot be taken lightly therefore all killing is wrong Christians often talk of human life as being sacred, they refer to the sanctity of life not only when talking about abortion but when considering issues such as abortion, euthanasia, embryo research, the care of disabled or the elderly. They believe there is something special or holy about human life. Every human, Christians believe, is special to God. In The Bible, Genesis chapter 1 verse 27 God is described as creating the first humans. The Bible says, ' So God created people in his own image; God patterned them after himself; male and female he created them.' As we know god did not only create the Humans we are part of the whole universe but we they do believe that they are the only part of God's creation described as being in the image of God. Christians don't believe we look like God. They believe being in the image of God means that we are somehow special, we have something of God's nature in us, or at least the capacity to show God's nature. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is an imaginary case by Judis Jarvis Thompson called 'a defence of abortion' in which she argues the woman's case even though the foetus is considered a person. Within the case she asks you to imagine that you're in bed with a violinist and he has a rare blood type and a fatal kidney aliment, and you are the only matching blood type. As the violinist is such a valuable asset to the musical world the musical association kidnap you and 'plug' you into him. The doctors say that they never knew it would happen this way but now if we unplug you it would kill him but not to worry we can safely unplug you both after 9 months. This case raises many moral issues, what rights does the violinist have over your body? Do you have any duty to the violinist? How could you justify unplugging yourself? Do the conclusions above suggest women have a right to terminate a wanted and unwanted pregnancy? In conclusion we can see that there will always be differing moral views towards abortion as views are forever changing. The role of women in the modern world is also changing so where can we know draw the line with abortion in ancient times when religion came about it was forbidden but over time it has seen to become acceptable to the stage where an abortion can be had up to when a woman is twenty four weeks pregnant even though children are being born and surviving before this cut off date. So where do we stop? Where can we draw the line with abortion? And how far down the slippery slope can we fall before we even realise it. At the moment abortion has to permitted by two doctors eventually people will decide that this is now unnecessary, how long will it take for this to become one doctors consent. Or even none, how long will it take for walk in clinics to be established? Sana Gul ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Abortion and other medical issues section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Abortion and other medical issues essays

  1. A study of Christian beliefs about abortion in comparison with the ethical consideration of ...

    and have emphasised that she has interests, which need to be taken into account (1974).13 A statement was made by the Church of England's Board of Social Responsibility a response to the Roman Catholic Archbishops of Great Britain in 1980.

  2. Is abortion wrong or right?

    It is two pills which contain high-dosage of combined oral contraceptive (levonorgestrel, 250 micrograms and ethinyloestradiol, 50 micrograms). This pill is suggested to be taken when contraception fails or when a woman has had unprotected sex over a period of 72 hours.

  1. What does the law say about abortion?.

    danger through continuing with the pregnancy or if keeping the baby would cause any mental or physical damage to the already existing children (if any).For example, if the mother had no money or nowhere to live this would allow her to abort her baby.

  2. In this essay I will only focus on the religion of Christianity and its ...

    One of the earliest teachings of Christianity not in the New Testament, The Didache, says: "You shall not kill by abortion the fruit of the womb and you shall not murder the infant already born" The Bible also says in Exodus 20:13 "Thou shalt not kill".

  1. Describe Kant's reasons for defending the need for the categorical imperative. How useful are ...

    Happiness should only be sought if it doesn't prevent another's happiness. But difficult decisions do have to be made, and Kant's approach is not best suited to deciding upon the answers to some questions. If we were going to war, and by bombing one small village, we would bring the

  2. There are many issues and arguments raised when the subject abortion is mentioned.

    the mother/father then it should take place as this should in effect stop the need for back street abortion where the mother can end up dead.

  1. Does a person have the right to bring his/her own life to an end? ...

    Different translation points have been suggested. The more popular ones have been implantation (one week), neural crest stage (14 days), rudimentary circulation (21 days), breathing movements (12 weeks), viability (approx 24 wks) and birth. The problem with most of these is that they are either difficult to define exactly in time or occur at different stages in gestation.

  2. Christian views on abortion, IVF and animal research.

    Indirect euthanasia. This involves the use of something to cause death. To cause the persons death is the direct intention of the treatment. Passive euthanasia. This is when another person makes the decision that someone who is very ill should die.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work