• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An acceptance of the practice of Voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in the Sanctity of Life but not with the attitudes of some ethical philosophers. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay plan * Example of a recent case of voluntary euthanasia * Definition * Churches * Sanctity of life * Euthanasia in the Bible * BMA association report * Hippocratic oath * Weaknesses and strengths after each section * Aquinas * Situation ethics * Kant * Utilitarianism - Stuart Mill, Bentham * Hume * Nietzsche * Conclusion An acceptance of the practice of Voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in the Sanctity of Life but not with the attitudes of some ethical philosophers. Discuss. 'No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment'.1 Imagine at the age of 40, you are diagnosed with Motor neurone disease, a fatal disease that causes degeneration of the motor neurones, which leads the wasting of muscles. You are intellectually sound but totally dependant on your spouse for physical support. You are aware of the fact that your death is imminent and will probably be painful, suffering from severe breathing problems and pneumonia before slipping into a coma. By the age of 42 you want to end your life, leaving your two children and spouse with more pleasant memories of you, however, the courts will not allow you to end your life2. This was exactly the situation of Diane Pretty, the most recent of euthanasia case in the media. However, she died on 12th May 2002 after losing her case. Euthanasia continues to be one of the most controversial subjects of the modern world. The word euthanasia literally means 'dying well' and it originates from two Greek words, 'eu' and 'thanatos'. Euthanasia is defined as '...an action or omission which of itself or by intention causes death.'3 A case where a patient specifically asks to die repeatedly and receives euthanasia, which is not a decision made by a doctor or the patient's family or friends, is one of voluntary euthanasia. ...read more.

Middle

Within the Christian religion there are different interpretations of the Sanctity of life argument, as medical advances have made it increasingly difficult to determine when 'life' is still a life. Another weakness it that the sanctity of life argument is essentially deontological as it reflects the assumption that a person believes their life is valuable to God. Therefore it cannot be relevant to a non-believer. It also has strengths however, because a Christian would very much believe that God does have control over every life and this would be a very valid point. Some may argue that for the non-Christians, it would play on their conscious and it is their compassion, or agape, which makes them feel this guilt. For the non-believer it stops the risk of a slippery slope, and people being killed for convenience. As a Florida physician said: 'We shall start by putting patients away because they are in intolerable pain and haven't long to live anyway and we shall end by putting them away because it's Friday night and we want to get away for the weekend'.17 The sanctity of life argument can sometimes have adverse affects; it could be regarded that ending a person's life can have more positive effects than negative. For example if the person is deeply suffering and has a sincere wish to end their life and the family are happy with their choice in the situation, it maybe more pleasant and beneficial to allow euthanasia because it leaves everyone with happier memories. It also means that socially it is less expensive and it means there are more hospital beds that younger patients with a chance of regaining a normal life can use. There are many ethical philosophers who have produced ethical theories about the acceptance of the practice of voluntary euthanasia. Saint Thomas Aquinas who lived from 1225-74, developed the deontological argument of natural law, and that situations in our lives should conform to these absolute principles. ...read more.

Conclusion

He also believed that 'whatever purpose there is in life, it is given that meaning by humankind. There is no God.'27 Nietzsche's ethical theory presents a clear challenge both to religious ideas of morality, utilitarianism and Natural Law. He believed that human kind shies away from the idea of meaningless; they would rather rely on theories such as the one that the church presents, and feel guilty about their sin, than accept nothingness. In his theories, Nietzsche totally disregards Christianity and so would not feel an obligation to comply with the sanctity of life. There is therefore no reason that he would disagree with voluntary euthanasia, because it is the decision of the person; they should not be made to feel guilty about issues that they do not have to consider. Voluntary euthanasia, is not compatible with the Christian belief in the sanctity of life because it disputes the belief that God has total control over a person's life and suffering, and that He is not loving enough to support them through their pain. Also to say the practice of voluntary euthanasia is incompatible with the beliefs of some ethical philosophers is a fair assessment to make. There are many philosophers who condone euthanasia, however a significant number of these are Christians anyway. The vast majority of non-believers or atheist philosophers have developed theories that can accept euthanasia in certain circumstances, for example Hume, John Stuart Mill, and Bentham. I believe that the sanctity of life argument is a strong argument and could relieve society of serious mis-interpretations regarding a person's wish to the direction of their life. However, it is up to the individual to make the judgement for themselves, and in carefully considered instances, euthanasia may be permitted. As the first man to commit assisted suicide under the voluntary euthanasia in Darwin Australia said 'the church and the law should be separate. If you disagree with voluntary euthanasia don't use it, but please don't deny the right to me to use it if I want to'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    on their treatment as they obviously most of them have not had medical training like he has, although the patient does know how they are feeling. "Dr Emerson, I am afraid I must insist that you do not stick that needle in me."

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    dignity in dying without pain so they do not have to resort to Euthanasia. They promote Care Not Killing through their website and campaign against the legalisation of Euthanasia. Their aim is to build a large amount of political support so that if the issue of Euthanasia was ever to

  1. Discursive Essay on Euthanasia.

    Then they could face death "face on". There is a myth that the human body is sacred, but Jack says, "try to stop a vet from putting an animal to death and you would be arrested. Try to stop a man from putting another man to death and nothing would happen".

  2. To what Extent was Hitler’s Euthanasia policy a distinct “Nazi” Policy?

    On arrival to their destination they would be told to participate in a physical evaluation and the people that had valuables, gold teeth etc, were marked in a red cross to be used later for scientific research and thus were brought elsewhere.

  1. Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Euthanasia people state that abortion is something people choose - it is not forced on them and that voluntary euthanasia will not be forced on them either. They are missing the main point - it is not an issue of force - it is an issue of the way laws

  2. Euthanasia is the deliberate killing of a person for the benefit of that person.

    However, the numbers of those rejecting both euthanasia and assisted suicide rose steeply when doctors were asked would they actually take part in such procedures. 26%, said they were willing actually to practice assisted suicide as compared with 74% who would refuse.

  1. Explain how Islamic teachings about the sanctity of life affects a Muslim's attitude towards ...

    People who go against Allah will go to Jahannam, but as Allah is all-forgiving, people can reach Jahannah (heaven) eventually after paying off their sins in Jahannam. "When the trumpet is blown, there will be no relationships between them that day, nor will they ask after another" (The Quran)

  2. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    This being that at least two doctors should diagnose the patient as having an incurable and terminal illness, and that the individual must give a written request for euthanasia at least thirty days beforehand. The 'Voluntary-euthanasia society' (Exit) aims to bring about a change in law so that: 'An adult

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work