• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An embryo is a person and has the right to live? Discuss

Extracts from this document...


?An embryo is a person and has the right to life? A Roman Catholic would agree with this statement. Firstly, they are followers of Natural law and divine command ethics. As such, they relate to the teachings in the bible that relate to the sanctity of life, and therefore they believe an embryo is a person from the moment of conception. Roman Catholic law teaches that a foetus is a human being. Secondly, Natural law is based upon God?s purpose for his creation, and Natural Law places the protection of life and species above all others. Finally, they believe that life is holy and belongs to God, and thus only god can take it away, and life and personhood begins at conception. All persons have a natural right to life, and the mother and foetus have equal rights. "human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. ...read more.


This is consistent with his general ethical theory. Singer argues that it is impossible to find precisely when human life begins, as human development is a gradual process, not something that happens in one instance. ?The argument that a fetus is not alive is a resort to a convenient fiction that turns an evidently living being into one that legally is not alive. Instead of accepting such fictions, we should recognise that the fact that a being is human, and alive, does not in itself tell us whether it is wrong to take that being's life?. Singer states that the argument should compare the preference of a woman vs the preference of the foetus (if the foetus was able to have preferences, which Singer doesn?t believe, this is just how he attacks the anti-abortion argument back). In Singers view, preference is all forms of benefit or harm one may wish to obtain or avoid. ...read more.


neither agree nor disagree, but I believe that it is based and should be argued on a general case by case basis. I argue that the sufficient condition for personhood and the right to life is at 24 weeks, when the foetus can experience pain and pleasure. Therefore I disagree with the Catholics who believe that life starts at 0 weeks, or Singer who states that it can be up to one year after birth. I believe that the mother has more rights than the foetus, and therefore if the mother has a valid reason for abortion, she should be able to abort whenever she likes, even after the 24th week if she so wishes, as her needs are greater than the foetus. To conclude, I believe that there is no absolute law or ruling on this statement, as it comes down to the needs of the mother, her own personal beliefs, personal life, and what she wishes, as the needs of the mother outweigh that of the foetus. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Abortion and other medical issues section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Abortion and other medical issues essays

  1. An embryo is a person and has a right to life. Discuss

    But I would disagree that life does not begin at conception, because it is another potential form of life. Muslims would say that abortion is allowed in particular instances but it is not very desirable because they believe that life is sacred.

  2. Every pregnant woman has an inalienable right to have an abortion. Discuss.

    It then does not appear that a woman would have many rights in Sikh societies, let alone the inalienable right to have an abortion. Jews can either deicide if a foetus becomes a person at conception or birth, obviously those who believe a foetus becomes a full person at birth

  1. Abortion: Right or Wrong?

    Therefore they believe artificially induced abortion is legally acceptable until about 24weeks. In addition, they argue that it is a woman's right to decide, in conjunction with the father when appropriate, whether she wishes to have a baby. It is her body and she should ultimately control what happens to it.

  2. 'An acceptance of the practice of Abortion (or of embryo research) is incompatible with ...

    he created him, male and female he created them.'4 This Biblical statement claims that there is a divine link between man and God and that we reflect God's image. Therefore it could be said that a person's life is divine and sacred as it represents God as his own creation and this echoes the idea of the sanctity of life.

  1. Does a person have the right to bring his/her own life to an end? ...

    Different translation points have been suggested. The more popular ones have been implantation (one week), neural crest stage (14 days), rudimentary circulation (21 days), breathing movements (12 weeks), viability (approx 24 wks) and birth. The problem with most of these is that they are either difficult to define exactly in time or occur at different stages in gestation.

  2. 'Every pregnant woman has an inalienable right to have an abortion'. Discuss.

    According to the conservative, the embryo or foetus is a potential person, who is equal in moral position to an actual person. The crucial differences in many viewpoints stems from here. The conservative believes that to be a potential person is sufficient to establish moral status.

  1. Challenges to Roe v. Wade - women's right to privacy?

    freedom of speech and freedom of religion, as it granted women the right to choice. In Doe v. Bolton the Court identified "health" as a concept including "all factors - physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age - relevant to the well-being of the patient" (The Center, 2003).

  2. Abortion- could you live with the remorse of murder on your conscience?

    In the world today people are always campaging for our own human rights. If you think about it we are really treating our unborn babies like animals, as we aren't giving them the right to live. How can you campaign about animals when 1% of all abortions that take place each year is for the mother's benefit?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work