• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An explanation and evaluation of the different perspectives on religion offered by Richard Dawkins and Alistair McGrath.

Extracts from this document...


McGrath - Dawkins with a twist? An explanation and evaluation of the different perspectives on religion offered by Richard Dawkins and Alistair McGrath. Throughout the ages there have been theists and their outnumbered counterparts; atheists. In recent years this controversy has been fuelled by an exponential increase in the non-religious; thanks to the development of science and freedom of philosophical ideas. In 2006 a man named Richard Dawkins released a proverbial catalyst into this issue in the form of a book; The God Delusion. A book created to methodically disprove and discredit the beliefs which so many hold dear. This caused one of the most popularised philosophical outcries of our time. One of the most famous rebuttals is that of one Alistair McGrath entitled The Dawkins Delusion written to do to Dawkins' arguments what The God Delusion intended to do to religion. Here their arguments will be displayed in tandem and this infamous debate analysed. A heavy influence in both of these works is the concept of the NOMA conceptualised by Stephen Jay Gould and the McGrath introduced POMA. NOMA stands for Non-overlapping magisteria which is the theory that the authority of religion is not in opposition to that of science and one can easily hold a belief in both. ...read more.


This gives a scientific explanation for the origin of religion thus showing it to be nothing more than a popularised idea which, as he states later to the book is detrimental to those which hold it. McGrath counters this point by saying that the concept of the meme is folly. He shows that there is no conclusive evidence for the existence of the meme and that how in recent times the concept has been abandoned by most respected evolutionary biologists. He also points out that Dawkins shows no model sample or even defined theory of the meme itself and as such he believes that this is Dawkins simply creating an entity to support his belief about religion. However I would say that although the "meme" as a self supporting entity does not exist it is a very accurate model for demonstrating the transfer of knowledge and social customs throughout many different human cultures and ergo Dawkins points remain valid (if for the wrong reasons). Despite his seemingly innocuous intentions McGrath attempts to do more than spurn Dawkins in his book. In the first few chapters he talks about how he respects the thoughts and beliefs of atheists and that he only has a problem with the poorly structured arguments of Richard Dawkins. ...read more.


As such laws such as homosexuals should be stoned to death upon discovery (Leviticus) can now be ignored. This brings up the issue of what I shall hereby refer to as religious cherry picking. This is when a religious person chooses to accept certain parts of their holy texts and leader's teachings and ignore others in accordance to their moral preference. This is illogical. If god is as omnipotent and omniscient as he is claimed to be then who are we as his inept creations to modify his word and law? As such, although Jesus does say to disregard these slightly more morally uncomfortable points, who are we to say that his word in the bible is more accurate to God's will than that in Leviticus? Why was God's word so ambiguous and interpretable before the ascension of his son than after? Therefore it is not an irrelevance when the Christian holy text states that religious holy war is recommended. To conclude, although religion can advocate violence, we as sentient humans will interpret it to match their own opinions and beliefs. Ergo the only way that religion will cause violence is when the one interpreting it has a violent agenda which they would be very likely to fulfill with or without religion. As such, no. Religion is not the root of all evil. We are. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Agnosticism, Atheism, and Theism

    Upon death, one enters heaven or hell. They would likely meet the masters of these domains-a God or devil-and the existence of a God would be proven, in an indisputable, factual sense. Let us then suppose theistic belief is wrong.

  2. Assess Nietzsche's critique of religion.

    rising on the social scale and for ordinary men it provides a comfort. If you live your life in drudgery, it gives your life meaning and purpose it would otherwise lack. However, it becomes disadvantageous if religion is the sovereign ie., religion is an end in itself as opposed to a means to an end.

  1. Bertrand Russell and Atheism.

    I have seen very little proof in the teachings of any religion that I have looked into. They want me to follow what they believe based on blind faith. I would not jump off a bridge because everyone else was doing it and they said it was the way to

  2. God and Evil - Atheism

    He is safe, and he can't ALWAYS have to come and help us! So this is why I don't believe in it! For the Dualist view, I also think that this is incorrect in some ways, although right in some.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Any criticism of God would have to be based along the lines that somehow he should have created more than he did-which seems rather strange. Any criticism of God would be based along the lines that God should have some how created more than he did, but there are many

  2. Science And Religion.

    First came the planets, then the plants and trees, then the fish and the birds, then the animals and the humans. People believe that could have been what happened when God made the universe. Both cosmologies believe that an underlying force caused the universe to form.

  1. English Oral – The Hypocrisy of Religion.

    It encourages weakness. Men have been taught to "trust in god" and rely upon divine intervention in daily life instead of finding real strength in themselves. Most children are raised to purposely believe a particular religion and tend not to study other religions; to raise a child by religion is wrong, they should

  2. 'The Subtle Knife' written by Phillip Pullman - review

    He is rumoured to be a shaman whose tribal Tartar name is Jopari the English translation of which is John Parry. It is his duty to find the bearer of the Subtle Knife and inform him of his critical role in the fate of the universe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work