• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of Moral Luck Views of Aristotle and Epictetus.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analysis of Moral Luck Views of Aristotle and Epictetus by Selim Cillov U62-01-2757 Aristotle, the founder of western science, and Epictetus, one of the greatest stoicists, both has their theories for the issue of "Moral Luck". To have a basic idea about the topic, I believe we should describe it from a non-philosophical point of view. After doing that we can compare both Aristotle's and Epictetus' points of views and distinguish between them with examples from "Into Thin Air"(ITA), written by Jon Krakauer. Moral Luck, if described from general perspective, consists of the actions that happen by luck and result in moral ends. What I mean by moral ends is the situations that have something to do with moral or ethical values. Overall, moral luck deals with all the issues concerned with assertion of praise and blame, deliberation of responsibility, and things that are not in our control such as place of birth, our parents, our nationality and so on. Although they both have this structure in common, both Aristotle and Epictetus have different arguments about moral luck. Both Aristotle and Epictetus have a single point in common. They both have the idea of luck. Aristotle describes this as things that are not in our control and Epictetus describes this as things that are not up to us. The distinction between them is simple. Something that is not in our control can be up to us. However, something that is up to us must be in our control. ...read more.

Middle

You wouldn't climb it alone by yourself in bad weather conditions if you were not a very skilful climber-and even the most skilful fail. There is no doubt that climbing Everest is a voluntary action performed for a noble purpose. Even though the conditions are in favor, you cannot predict anything about the mountain. So what we have is a group of people performing a voluntary action. Being the result of a voluntary action, the consequences should be faced, just like an action should be done voluntarily, to be praised or blamed. So, voluntary actions are in our control. Even though we cannot predict the exact conditions, we know that there is a possibility of bad things happening in Everest and we must take these small possibilities into account. This makes us responsible for our actions even though if we are in a situation we do not know much about. Second situation I want to examine is Rob Hall's death. Let's summarize it briefly. Rob Hall, the guide of the tour, was with Hansen. Early in the morning he called for help, saying that Hansen was out of oxygen and he needed oxygen fast. In the Base Camp, Cotter and the others were almost sure that Hansen was dead already. Telling Hall that he cannot think healthy, Cotter asked Hall to descend. Hall, on the other hand, would not consider leaving his client there and going back. He was not aware of the fact that his client, Hansen, was already dead. ...read more.

Conclusion

So, if someone is going to climb Everest, then it means that s/he considered these possibilities. That makes them responsible for their own actions and diminishes the fact of luck. The second situation we examined from ITA was Rob Hall's death. Rob Hall decided to stay in the Southern Summit. He made this decision. He should bare the consequences. Since Epictetus' philosophy is for disastrous situations and since this is one of them, Epictetus' philosophy fits in the context better than Aristotle's. Epictetus says if we live by his handbook we will be in good health. Let's take a look at Rob Hall's violations of the handbook. Rob Hall tries to change faith. He tries to save his client who only has a slightest chance of living. By doing so, he tries to control things that are not up to him. If you want something that is not up to you and do not get it, you are misfortunate then. Rob Hall is misfortunate here then. Also, Rob Hall's judgment of the current situation was blurred. He was not thinking properly, therefore not judging properly. All of these facts considered, Rob Hall, in this case, is responsible for his actions. Now that we examined both Aristotle's and Epictetus' perspectives, we can make a distinction between them. Aristotle is dealing with everyday philosophy and has a less strict perspective. On the other hand, Epictetus is a philosopher who is dealing with disastrous situations and has a strict perspective when compared to Aristotle. Both of their philosophies have a common base, idea of luck, but have a different continuation. I ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Christian Views on Wealth & poverty

    In Mark 10: 17-31, Jesus explains to a very rich man who had supposedly followed all of the ten commandments, that the only way to receive eternal life, was to go and sell all of your belongings and give the money to the poor.

  2. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    Macintyre described a virtue as; "an acquired human quality, the possession of and exercise of which tends to enable us to achieve those goods which are internal to practices and the lack of which effectively prevents us from achieving any such goods" The ideas of Alistair Macintyre acted directly towards the increased interest in virtue.

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Plato was making a judgement that the mind had the ability to discern the ideal forms. The form of the Good is compared to the sun, In the visible world, the sun is a form of growth and light and gives us the faculty to see, in this way it gives objects their sense and allows them to be perceived.

  2. Are Moral Values Objective Or Subjective?

    knowledge of right and wrong, good and bad, and therefore they have no moral values. If this is true then the moral values they have later on in life must have been taught to them or obtained by their experiences and interaction with their surroundings.

  1. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    He understood the problems with some of Bentham's ideas. He believed that it was desirable for people to have pleasure. He disagreed with Bentham's ideas that all pleasures were of the same quality. Mill distinguished between higher pleasures and lower pleasures. He believed that higher pleasures were those related to the mind and lower pleasures were those related to the body.

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    avoidance of pain, and is most famously found to be the basis of any social contract theory. Hobbes for example, writes that; "Good and evil are names that signify our appetites and aversions.3" When the person places himself under an obligation to the law, they are also placing themselves under

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    been given the right to do what we please with it, in this instance, is God's power limited to just giving life? Because if we have been given life to do as we please with it, then with that, all god's power and control, which is what is implied in the sanctity of life, is taken away.

  2. life after death

    The proof of heaven and hells existence because Jesus went and came back by the resurrection. Jesus taught that you can be forgiven and go to heaven whoever you are. In the time of Jesus Mathew was a tax collector and deprived the poor he changed his ways and became

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work