• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of Moral Luck Views of Aristotle and Epictetus.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analysis of Moral Luck Views of Aristotle and Epictetus by Selim Cillov U62-01-2757 Aristotle, the founder of western science, and Epictetus, one of the greatest stoicists, both has their theories for the issue of "Moral Luck". To have a basic idea about the topic, I believe we should describe it from a non-philosophical point of view. After doing that we can compare both Aristotle's and Epictetus' points of views and distinguish between them with examples from "Into Thin Air"(ITA), written by Jon Krakauer. Moral Luck, if described from general perspective, consists of the actions that happen by luck and result in moral ends. What I mean by moral ends is the situations that have something to do with moral or ethical values. Overall, moral luck deals with all the issues concerned with assertion of praise and blame, deliberation of responsibility, and things that are not in our control such as place of birth, our parents, our nationality and so on. Although they both have this structure in common, both Aristotle and Epictetus have different arguments about moral luck. Both Aristotle and Epictetus have a single point in common. They both have the idea of luck. Aristotle describes this as things that are not in our control and Epictetus describes this as things that are not up to us. The distinction between them is simple. Something that is not in our control can be up to us. However, something that is up to us must be in our control. ...read more.

Middle

You wouldn't climb it alone by yourself in bad weather conditions if you were not a very skilful climber-and even the most skilful fail. There is no doubt that climbing Everest is a voluntary action performed for a noble purpose. Even though the conditions are in favor, you cannot predict anything about the mountain. So what we have is a group of people performing a voluntary action. Being the result of a voluntary action, the consequences should be faced, just like an action should be done voluntarily, to be praised or blamed. So, voluntary actions are in our control. Even though we cannot predict the exact conditions, we know that there is a possibility of bad things happening in Everest and we must take these small possibilities into account. This makes us responsible for our actions even though if we are in a situation we do not know much about. Second situation I want to examine is Rob Hall's death. Let's summarize it briefly. Rob Hall, the guide of the tour, was with Hansen. Early in the morning he called for help, saying that Hansen was out of oxygen and he needed oxygen fast. In the Base Camp, Cotter and the others were almost sure that Hansen was dead already. Telling Hall that he cannot think healthy, Cotter asked Hall to descend. Hall, on the other hand, would not consider leaving his client there and going back. He was not aware of the fact that his client, Hansen, was already dead. ...read more.

Conclusion

So, if someone is going to climb Everest, then it means that s/he considered these possibilities. That makes them responsible for their own actions and diminishes the fact of luck. The second situation we examined from ITA was Rob Hall's death. Rob Hall decided to stay in the Southern Summit. He made this decision. He should bare the consequences. Since Epictetus' philosophy is for disastrous situations and since this is one of them, Epictetus' philosophy fits in the context better than Aristotle's. Epictetus says if we live by his handbook we will be in good health. Let's take a look at Rob Hall's violations of the handbook. Rob Hall tries to change faith. He tries to save his client who only has a slightest chance of living. By doing so, he tries to control things that are not up to him. If you want something that is not up to you and do not get it, you are misfortunate then. Rob Hall is misfortunate here then. Also, Rob Hall's judgment of the current situation was blurred. He was not thinking properly, therefore not judging properly. All of these facts considered, Rob Hall, in this case, is responsible for his actions. Now that we examined both Aristotle's and Epictetus' perspectives, we can make a distinction between them. Aristotle is dealing with everyday philosophy and has a less strict perspective. On the other hand, Epictetus is a philosopher who is dealing with disastrous situations and has a strict perspective when compared to Aristotle. Both of their philosophies have a common base, idea of luck, but have a different continuation. I ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Plato was making a judgement that the mind had the ability to discern the ideal forms. The form of the Good is compared to the sun, In the visible world, the sun is a form of growth and light and gives us the faculty to see, in this way it gives objects their sense and allows them to be perceived.

  2. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    Mill believed that engaging in things that made the mind think and were difficult could attain more pleasure once they were understood rather than something that was pleasurable for while but had no real relevance to the intellectual mind. For example, Mill believed there was more value in 'Pushpin than poetry.'

  1. The Dual, Blurred Symbolism of The Scarlet Letter

    Hester is, in effect, taken out of reality at this point. She is no longer an active participant in the world; she is a spectator, held up as an example of fallen grace in her harsh society. It is her public exhibition of the letter that allows her the moral fortitude to withstand its shame.

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    Yet, this too faces criticism; what if a situation were too arise where the majority of people wanted something to be done that was clearly reprehensible wrong. For example, during WWII, Hitler and his Nazis followers began the extermination of all Jews.

  1. The Poetics - Aristotle.

    However, katharsis does not necessarily purge emotions in the sense that it rids all feelings. Instead, katharsis flushes away excess feelings in order to bring one to a neutral, balanced state of life. Therefore, a citizen can view a tragedy, realize the faults of characters, and find a similar blemish in himself to link emotional flaws.

  2. Christian Views on Wealth & poverty

    In Mark 10: 17-31, Jesus explains to a very rich man who had supposedly followed all of the ten commandments, that the only way to receive eternal life, was to go and sell all of your belongings and give the money to the poor.

  1. RE crousework topic 9

    It is also a fact that every day you miss a fast in the Holy month of Ramadan; you must feed the poor people for those missed days. In the Quran it also states: "Be steadfast in your prayer and pay charity, whatever good you send forth for your future,

  2. life after death

    a true Christian working in the name of god and went to heaven. This teaches Christians in order to go to heaven you must change yourself in your actions and in your heart and truly believing in god. "When he ascended to the heights, he led a crowd of captives

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work