• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are Designer Babies Wrong?

Extracts from this document...


Are Designer Babies Wrong? What is a designer baby? The term ' designer baby' originated from journalists to describe the process of modifying human embryos, which could then in the near future led to the horrific idea that technology could allow parents to chose desirable characteristics for their unborn children. However in actual fact this is not what scientists are trying to propose, the concept that many scientists are trying to adapt is the use in advanced technology to help decrease some parents chances of having a baby with a genetic disorder such as cystic fibrosis. Yet in recent times the term designer baby has been used a bit too freely, mostly within journalism , and has created a negative shadow over the process of modifying embryos, in the constant fear that superficial needs will take hold. Naturally there are many ethical issues which arise when the topic of designer babies crops up, hence creating the argument whether the medical procedure is effectively 'wrong.' A designer baby is only produced via two methods, which both take place externally outside of the mother. The first is In Vitro Fertillisation, more commonly known as IVF, which involves the fertillising of the egg outside of the mother's body, where the sperm is specifically chosen to fertillise the egg, based on the genes that the sperm carries, effectively allowing doctors to determine what genes the embryo will have and identifying the sex. The second technique is called Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD), which once again takes place in a laboratory, but this time the egg has been fertillised and therefore is effectively classified as an embryo. Several embryos are fertillised with the aid of technology, usually involving the IVF, for couples who find it hard to conceive. A screening of the embryos then takes place , which allows scientists to identify which embryos will be born with a genetic disease, and which will not, it is only these 'healthy' embryos that are implanted back into the mothers womb. ...read more.


Many argue that the child is being 'used' and the parents would be greatly disappointed if once born the child, was not able to provide the required cells needed to help save their sibling, and could cause resentment. Also is it fair to ask for a child to have this weight on its shoulders as it grows up, that when it is old enough to be operated on, their elder sibling is going to rely on them to under go surgery, as their last chance to live? However the main concern that people share in designer babies, is literally what it stands for, that in the future couples will be able to design characteristics in their children, and choose desirable features such as eye colour, sex, and hair colour. There is this risk within the society that we live in today that this could in fact happen. If you study the superficial factors that dominate our culture through the press and celebrity imagery, it is not hard to imagine that within say 20 years time, the rich and famous will be able to afford to design their child, in order for them ' fit in.' The Case Against With any controversial argument you have to weigh up the pros and cons, and it has to be said that there are a great deal of advantages to the procedures that create designer babies. The ultimate advantage has to be the quality of life that the child will have, with the screening that takes place of the genetic information that the embryos hold within the laboratory, scientists can prevent a child from being born with deadly diseases such as Huntingdon's Disease. Surely this is not only more beneficial to the unborn child, who will not have to face life with this impediment, but one must also take into careful consideration the lives of the parents. Naturally all parents will want their children to be happy, healthy and to have a long life, however there are couples ...read more.


of an elder sibling, against the fantasy that in future generations we will be able to design our children, I feel that the life of the sick child bares far more ground. One must also consider the quality of life that a child would have, if natural fertilization had been allowed to take place between the parents who carried the recessive allele for such genetic diseases as cystic fibrosis. By screening embryos before hand, and preventing the development of an embryo , you are effectively preventing a child from having a low quality of life, which could be filled with suffering through their illness. The devastation the parents would have to face as well, would be immense if the child would have only a short life , and within it be in pain. Naturally I can appreciate the moral issues that arise with any medical interference, and can accept how an individual could see it wrong to dispose of embryos, but without these chances the lives of young children would be wasted, or a child being born with a life threatening disease. To conclude it is society's view that needs to change, and needs to realize that as long as no body requests to design their baby, then scientists are not going to offer it. Thousands of scientists and biochemists have empahised the seriousness that is IVF and PGD, and that they do serve a real purpose, and have no intention to use it to make money, or create cosmetically designed children. So why are we even considering it? Just like the issue of cloning, the aims of serious scientists is not to clone human beings because their too believe it is unethical, and yet we are so far away from reaching that catastrophic phase, so why should we face the birth of many children with genetic diseases, or risk losing their lives if siblings because to screen embryos 'designer babies' may one day increase the chances of human cloning, this cannot be just? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Abortion and other medical issues section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Abortion and other medical issues essays

  1. Explain why Religious people may have problems with transplant surgery?

    as being a Jew is passed on through the mothers blood, and transplanting organs from the dead into the living is usurping the role of God, and humans do not have a right to act as God, similar to Christians' and Muslims' beliefs.

  2. What Does Simon Martin Learn in Flour Babies by Anne Fine?

    "I don't know much," he told her. "But I do known this. I'd never do that to you. Never, never, never." This makes the reader think that there is something special going on, as if Simon's really taken to the role of a father- but this isn't a rehearsal.

  1. Essay on cloning - viewpoints of the major religions.

    The idea of independence is unknown to Buddhism, so Buddhist scholars generally believe that the way children are born is irrelevant. In fact, a few believe reproductive cloning might even be a method of reaching the state of enlightenment more quickly because the process could involve selectively breeding people with advanced moral qualities.

  2. Designer Babies

    Although some Christians are against genetically modifying babies, there are some that are in favour of it.

  1. Abortion: Pros And Cons

    Pregnancy is said to be more dangerous than abortion. There is more chance of a baby dying during pregnancy. Therefore abortion is much safer and quicker than going through pregnancy. However many women go through depression after having an abortion.

  2. Should babies with HIV positive mothers be aborted?

    Babies who are not infected lose their antibodies by the time they are about 18 months old. However most babies can be diagnosed as either infected or uninfected by the time they are 3 months old by using a different test, called a PCR test.

  1. Christian view on cloning

    In essence the cloning would ?throw away? many human embryos as ?waste material,? eliminating the chance for those embryos to grow into full maturity.

  2. 'Abortion is always wrong'. Discuss

    The foetus does not follow all of these rules and therefore it is not a living thing and it is not murder to abort it. Also religions such as Islam say that the foetus is not a living thing till about the ninth week.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work