• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are Moral Values Objective Or Subjective?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are Moral Values Objective Or Subjective? To answer the question, we first have to establish the definition of morality and the difference in meaning between objective and subjective morality. Morality is the principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong. The term "objective" in philosophy refers to the idea that there are universal moral laws like good or bad, right or wrong and therefore these morals exist outside of any person, i.e. like the law of gravity, there is a moral law which exists independently of any person, that awaits to be found. Subjective morality however is where moral laws are based on personal feelings and thoughts, and therefore without any humans there would be no morality. An important question to ask is, what motives have we for living morally? And how can one rationally justify a command such as, "Do not steal"? Some people may say that their motive for living morally is God, others may say to coexist for the existence of man, and others may simply have their personal interests at heart. ...read more.

Middle

This is because by you not helping there has been a public consequence, the woman being mugged. This is known as negligence and in England you can be arrested for an action such as this. Now that I have shown the morality cannot be a completely private matter, it does not prove that subjective morality is wrong. It merely shows that the argument for subjective morality cannot be supported by the argument that morality is a private matter. A stronger argument for subjective morality however, is that if moral values differ between cultures it would seem that these values cannot be objective, because if they were, then the whole world should share the exact same values as each other and as this is not the case we are led to believe that they are subjective. However the counter argument to this is that even though moral values seem to differ on the surface, the underlying, key morals do not differ such as murder and rape being looked down upon, e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore from this evidence one could use this as an argument for subjective morality but there would always be an element of doubt. To conclude, my personal opinion on the question "Are moral values objective or subjective?" is that morality is subjective. I have come to this conclusion because I think that moral values are too varied around the world. This is clearly evident when you look at murderous regimes such as Iraq where mass murder is not looked down upon, whereas if this activity occurred in America there would be great controversy. The war against terrorism could be seen as a war of morality where America believes that terrorist states are "wrong" and "bad". Therefore if morality was to be objective then there should not be this inconsistency in values and that is why morality must be subjective, and under current scientific evidence I can back this up further by the fact that babies are not born with a set of standard morals, as they grow up they learn their values through their emotions and experiences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    Why are we here? How are we supposed to act? What can we hope for in our time on this place? Are youngsters meant to get answers from pop songs...? From chat shows...? From teenage magazines...? It had been contended that the United Kingdom is out of step with Europe in that it avoids philosophical questions in its school system.

  2. "'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any ...

    People's opinions often take into account definite sets of values, which they agree with. This means there is some moral value behind Emotivism because people's emotions take into account several theories and we make our own minds up after analysing these theories and deciding which one we agree with most.

  1. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    it was before without debt relief, and is now one third higher than when the country was spending money on debt repayments. Christian Aid also states that despite most people believing that the money is to fuel military schemes, it is not and that it is contributing to take countries

  2. Analysis of Moral Luck Views of Aristotle and Epictetus.

    Being unconscious and performing involuntary actions, we cannot hold him responsible for anything he does. Let's analyze Epictetus' perspective through the same examples. Epictetus' main objective in his handbook was to distinguish between things that are up to us and things that are not up to us.

  1. Discuss whether moral judgements are subjective or objective

    The Christian doctrine of the Golden Rule "Love our neighbours as ourselves' enters into philosophy in the objective approach of Utilitarianism. However, the Golden Rule is not always a universally applicable norm because some of us desire things for ourselves which are not necessarily commendable.

  2. "Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" ...

    about it to his family and in court - he lost his family, and in the end, his life. In the same way, moral compromises are not the only way to achieve happiness. Chris demonstrates this. For example, unlike his father, Chris does not value money over everything - "the

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    It might also ignore the rights of the majority. A man might achieve such pure ecstasy from killing 100 people so that his positive utility outweighs the negative utility of the 100 people he murdered. Utilitarians argue that justification of either slavery, torture or murder would require improbably large benefits to outweigh the direct and extreme suffering to the

  2. The Canterbury Tales: A Moral Reading.

    Luckily, the rooster flatters the fox, the same way he was captured and gets away from him. "Never to trust a flatter" is the moral of the story. Trusting a flatterer can get a person into situations that they do not want to be in, as Chanticleer proved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work