• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Argument Construction - Terrorism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ARGUMENT CONSTRUCTION Terrorism is a political tactic usually employed by those with relatively few resources compared to there chosen advisories, designed to accomplish certain discreet objectives on the cheap. The definition of terrorism can be put forth as "an act of violence and intimidations to achieve political aims". This definition makes you think that is it worth the governments while to negotiate with terrorists or not? Trying to negotiate with someone (terrorists) that threatens you is a very difficult task to overcome; it involves a lot of patients and toleration. This is exactly what our government has been doing, it has been patient and has been tolerating the treats from the terrorists but how long can the government stay silent for. ...read more.

Middle

Information about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is already in public domain from UN reports and from Iraqi defectors, this clearly points that Iraq continues to posses these weapons and also shows that Iraq, has refurbished sites formally associated with the production of chemical and biological agents and it indicates that Iraq remains able to manufacture these agents and deliver them via bomb, shells artillery rockets and ballistic missiles. In Blair's dossiers it says where the funding of these weapons come in, it briefly sets out how Iraq is able to finance its weapons programme drawing on illicit earnings generated outside the UN control. In 2001 Iraq gathered $3 billon illegally. ...read more.

Conclusion

Looking at this recent war on terrorism can we say it was a success? Using arms would not solve terrorism, as you can see from the above example and also we have at hand a perfect example of the present state of the conflict between Israel and Palestine, there are no negations going on between the two, so Israel has sent it army into Palestine to get rid of the terrorists there and the Palestinians going into Israel tied with bombs on them selves. As you can see from this essay we can only overcome terrorism by negotiating. There for the government should negotiate with terrorists. Adnan Shah (Danny) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Domestic violence.

    A job description for this specialist post can be seen in appendix 2. The midwife in question is actively raising awareness within the clinical area on the subject of domestic violence, by providing teaching sessions and work shops for midwives.

  2. "Should America have gone to war against Iraq?"

    This was a few months after the UN came up with its resolution but the Iraqi government was not co-operating. A month later, the US planned an attack on Iraq. They already summed up an amount to be sent in the rebuilding of Iraq after the war.

  1. Analysis of speech extract: Tony Blair

    It is saying that the destruction will be not just of one, but of many, and it implying that it will be catastrophic. The word "extreme" is describing the terrorist groups. It is an absolute adjective. Perverted and false are both absolute adjectives, used to describe the view of Islam.

  2. Christians in developed countries.

    If Christians help the suffering now, then they will be rewarded in Heaven, for however you act now, that is what will be judged in the after life. In the parable of The Rich Man And Lazarus, the rich man fails to help the beggar, so he was punished after death for ignoring the beggar's needs.

  1. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    If Mandela says that he will not say that he will not use violence then he will remain in prison and it makes him look close to terrorism and if he admits it and then the people who are

  2. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    We consider first the U.S.'s current policy and strategy regarding weapons of mass destruction. As of recently as 2002, the United States outlines three "pillars" in its National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, these are; Counterproliferation To Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction Use, Strengthened Nonproliferation To Combat Weapons

  1. Compare how the construction of your chosen scenes illustrates different approaches to screen violence. ...

    The crowd circling the fight are all shouting and jeering, this again has been emphasised to create a brutal atmosphere. When Tyler begins to fight, the sound of the crowd is muffled and all we can hear is the fighting.

  2. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    Then the Christians believed that they were rescuing the holy places in Jerusalem on behalf of God. The soldiers wore a red cloth sewn onto their tunics to show that they were soldiers of Christ. Christians have many different perspectives on war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work