• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Argument Construction - Terrorism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ARGUMENT CONSTRUCTION Terrorism is a political tactic usually employed by those with relatively few resources compared to there chosen advisories, designed to accomplish certain discreet objectives on the cheap. The definition of terrorism can be put forth as "an act of violence and intimidations to achieve political aims". This definition makes you think that is it worth the governments while to negotiate with terrorists or not? Trying to negotiate with someone (terrorists) that threatens you is a very difficult task to overcome; it involves a lot of patients and toleration. This is exactly what our government has been doing, it has been patient and has been tolerating the treats from the terrorists but how long can the government stay silent for. ...read more.

Middle

Information about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is already in public domain from UN reports and from Iraqi defectors, this clearly points that Iraq continues to posses these weapons and also shows that Iraq, has refurbished sites formally associated with the production of chemical and biological agents and it indicates that Iraq remains able to manufacture these agents and deliver them via bomb, shells artillery rockets and ballistic missiles. In Blair's dossiers it says where the funding of these weapons come in, it briefly sets out how Iraq is able to finance its weapons programme drawing on illicit earnings generated outside the UN control. In 2001 Iraq gathered $3 billon illegally. ...read more.

Conclusion

Looking at this recent war on terrorism can we say it was a success? Using arms would not solve terrorism, as you can see from the above example and also we have at hand a perfect example of the present state of the conflict between Israel and Palestine, there are no negations going on between the two, so Israel has sent it army into Palestine to get rid of the terrorists there and the Palestinians going into Israel tied with bombs on them selves. As you can see from this essay we can only overcome terrorism by negotiating. There for the government should negotiate with terrorists. Adnan Shah (Danny) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Domestic violence.

    The approach used is to provide timely support and protection, bring perpetrators of violence to justice and to prevent violence. Included is six million pounds worth of funding for projects to reduce crime against women. Proposals for a new twenty four-hour help line for women, six point three million pounds

  2. Analysis of speech extract: Tony Blair

    "Insecurity spreads like a contagion." This is a simile, explaining the way in which insecurity spreads. It likens it to a contagion, an infection. Having similes and metaphors, is again evidence that there is little or no justification for what Tony Blair is saying and doing.

  1. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    But Mandela could also have been "an abused leader of his people" this is because the government could have discriminated him and put him in prison for no reason. Source A backs this up when it says "the communists were the only people who would eat with us, talk with us, live with us and work with us".

  2. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    Keeping this in mind, should deterrence prove to be ineffective the U.S. moves to the third step of counterproliferation which is defense and mitigation. This step speaks almost exclusively to the U.S. military who's objective is not only to assist deployed forces and allied states victims of Weapons Mass Destruction, but more importantly to defend against weapons of mass destruction.

  1. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    So, if the war is successful what is the next step? Indeed if the war is completed successfully with as minimum citizen causalities as possible, the UK and US would be in a very good position to produce a temporary constitution in Iraq.

  2. Christians in developed countries.

    If Christians help the suffering now, then they will be rewarded in Heaven, for however you act now, that is what will be judged in the after life. In the parable of The Rich Man And Lazarus, the rich man fails to help the beggar, so he was punished after death for ignoring the beggar's needs.

  1. Ought The UK and The USA attack Iraq?

    Iraq was driven out of Kuwait by the US led military campaign of January-February 1991, yet the sanctions continue. The bombing campaign destroyed Iraq's factories, water and sewage treatment plants and electrical power plants. Today, most medical problems in Iraq are the result of the inability of Iraq to restore its water and transport infrastructure under sanctions.

  2. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    Later Christians developed the idea that at times God's cause had to be defended. This is a holy war, a war fought on behalf of God and supported by God. An example of this type of war is the Crusades.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work