• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Argument Construction - Terrorism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ARGUMENT CONSTRUCTION Terrorism is a political tactic usually employed by those with relatively few resources compared to there chosen advisories, designed to accomplish certain discreet objectives on the cheap. The definition of terrorism can be put forth as "an act of violence and intimidations to achieve political aims". This definition makes you think that is it worth the governments while to negotiate with terrorists or not? Trying to negotiate with someone (terrorists) that threatens you is a very difficult task to overcome; it involves a lot of patients and toleration. This is exactly what our government has been doing, it has been patient and has been tolerating the treats from the terrorists but how long can the government stay silent for. ...read more.

Middle

Information about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is already in public domain from UN reports and from Iraqi defectors, this clearly points that Iraq continues to posses these weapons and also shows that Iraq, has refurbished sites formally associated with the production of chemical and biological agents and it indicates that Iraq remains able to manufacture these agents and deliver them via bomb, shells artillery rockets and ballistic missiles. In Blair's dossiers it says where the funding of these weapons come in, it briefly sets out how Iraq is able to finance its weapons programme drawing on illicit earnings generated outside the UN control. In 2001 Iraq gathered $3 billon illegally. ...read more.

Conclusion

Looking at this recent war on terrorism can we say it was a success? Using arms would not solve terrorism, as you can see from the above example and also we have at hand a perfect example of the present state of the conflict between Israel and Palestine, there are no negations going on between the two, so Israel has sent it army into Palestine to get rid of the terrorists there and the Palestinians going into Israel tied with bombs on them selves. As you can see from this essay we can only overcome terrorism by negotiating. There for the government should negotiate with terrorists. Adnan Shah (Danny) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Domestic violence.

    it and those not experiencing violence clearly do not mind being asked. Some writers however such as Hehir (1998) and Kent (1987) feel quite strongly that midwives should not snoop and may be abusing their position if they do so.

  2. "Should America have gone to war against Iraq?"

    March 6, 2003, this was when president George Bush asked for UN backing military action on Iraq. It was eleven days later when President Bush said that "The United Nations Security Council has not lived up to its responsibilities, so we will rise to ours".

  1. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    Keeping this in mind, should deterrence prove to be ineffective the U.S. moves to the third step of counterproliferation which is defense and mitigation. This step speaks almost exclusively to the U.S. military who's objective is not only to assist deployed forces and allied states victims of Weapons Mass Destruction, but more importantly to defend against weapons of mass destruction.

  2. Christians in developed countries.

    "Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed: a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions". Sometimes, money can be an obstacle but Christians should learn that they are not judge by God on their wealth but on the treasures they have built up in heaven.

  1. Compare how the construction of your chosen scenes illustrates different approaches to screen violence. ...

    The crowd circling the fight are all shouting and jeering, this again has been emphasised to create a brutal atmosphere. When Tyler begins to fight, the sound of the crowd is muffled and all we can hear is the fighting.

  2. Biological terrorism.

    Medication is limited and treatment is short. When infected with one of these agents, life expectancy becomes very short ("Plague..."). The thought of biological warfare started with the Romans using dead animals to poison the enemies water supply, but it was not until 1918 that the Japanese would form a special military unit dedicated to biological warfare.

  1. Analysis of speech extract: Tony Blair

    "People", is 'us'. We are the "people", we are the country, and unless Tony Blair has asked every one of us what exactly it is that we "crave", like much of his speech, his statement, "So people crave stability and order", is opinion, not fact.

  2. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    Another source that explains that Mandela was a terrorist is Source I, a statement by President Botha in January 1985. "The government is willing to consider Mr. Mandela's release. President Botha explains that the Nationalist's are willing to release Mandela if he "gives a full commitment that he will not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work