• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Argument Construction - Terrorism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ARGUMENT CONSTRUCTION Terrorism is a political tactic usually employed by those with relatively few resources compared to there chosen advisories, designed to accomplish certain discreet objectives on the cheap. The definition of terrorism can be put forth as "an act of violence and intimidations to achieve political aims". This definition makes you think that is it worth the governments while to negotiate with terrorists or not? Trying to negotiate with someone (terrorists) that threatens you is a very difficult task to overcome; it involves a lot of patients and toleration. This is exactly what our government has been doing, it has been patient and has been tolerating the treats from the terrorists but how long can the government stay silent for. ...read more.

Middle

Information about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is already in public domain from UN reports and from Iraqi defectors, this clearly points that Iraq continues to posses these weapons and also shows that Iraq, has refurbished sites formally associated with the production of chemical and biological agents and it indicates that Iraq remains able to manufacture these agents and deliver them via bomb, shells artillery rockets and ballistic missiles. In Blair's dossiers it says where the funding of these weapons come in, it briefly sets out how Iraq is able to finance its weapons programme drawing on illicit earnings generated outside the UN control. In 2001 Iraq gathered $3 billon illegally. ...read more.

Conclusion

Looking at this recent war on terrorism can we say it was a success? Using arms would not solve terrorism, as you can see from the above example and also we have at hand a perfect example of the present state of the conflict between Israel and Palestine, there are no negations going on between the two, so Israel has sent it army into Palestine to get rid of the terrorists there and the Palestinians going into Israel tied with bombs on them selves. As you can see from this essay we can only overcome terrorism by negotiating. There for the government should negotiate with terrorists. Adnan Shah (Danny) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Domestic violence.

    Hehir states that if health care workers want to become involved in social issues, that they could perhaps publicize the desperate need of so many mothers for adequate housing, transport and nursery provision. This however, is precisely why midwives are instrumental in the role of screening for violence, as they

  2. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    The UN will most probably run the country until a new Iraqi government is shaped. This will bring great freedom and an increase in standard of living for Iraqi's, for they will not be under rule of a tyrant.

  1. "Should America have gone to war against Iraq?"

    March 6, 2003, this was when president George Bush asked for UN backing military action on Iraq. It was eleven days later when President Bush said that "The United Nations Security Council has not lived up to its responsibilities, so we will rise to ours".

  2. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    Some Christians believe that the way Jesus' teaching should be interpreted is that wars are allowed but only when certain circumstances exist. These wars are called 'just wars'. Reasons for a just war: 1) War started and controlled by the authority of the state.

  1. Compare how the construction of your chosen scenes illustrates different approaches to screen violence. ...

    The crowd circling the fight are all shouting and jeering, this again has been emphasised to create a brutal atmosphere. When Tyler begins to fight, the sound of the crowd is muffled and all we can hear is the fighting.

  2. Biological terrorism.

    Medication is limited and treatment is short. When infected with one of these agents, life expectancy becomes very short ("Plague..."). The thought of biological warfare started with the Romans using dead animals to poison the enemies water supply, but it was not until 1918 that the Japanese would form a special military unit dedicated to biological warfare.

  1. Analysis of speech extract: Tony Blair

    The only significant concrete nouns here are "terrorist groups" and "weapons". "Weapons" is a common, concrete, plural, neuter gender noun. The word "key", is a concrete, common, singular, neuter gender noun; and here, is only used here as a metaphor.

  2. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    On the surface this looks like a fair compromise, Mandela says that he will never use violence again and they will let him out. But this makes Mandela look like a terrorist because if he says that he will

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work