• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Argument Construction - Terrorism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ARGUMENT CONSTRUCTION Terrorism is a political tactic usually employed by those with relatively few resources compared to there chosen advisories, designed to accomplish certain discreet objectives on the cheap. The definition of terrorism can be put forth as "an act of violence and intimidations to achieve political aims". This definition makes you think that is it worth the governments while to negotiate with terrorists or not? Trying to negotiate with someone (terrorists) that threatens you is a very difficult task to overcome; it involves a lot of patients and toleration. This is exactly what our government has been doing, it has been patient and has been tolerating the treats from the terrorists but how long can the government stay silent for. ...read more.

Middle

Information about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is already in public domain from UN reports and from Iraqi defectors, this clearly points that Iraq continues to posses these weapons and also shows that Iraq, has refurbished sites formally associated with the production of chemical and biological agents and it indicates that Iraq remains able to manufacture these agents and deliver them via bomb, shells artillery rockets and ballistic missiles. In Blair's dossiers it says where the funding of these weapons come in, it briefly sets out how Iraq is able to finance its weapons programme drawing on illicit earnings generated outside the UN control. In 2001 Iraq gathered $3 billon illegally. ...read more.

Conclusion

Looking at this recent war on terrorism can we say it was a success? Using arms would not solve terrorism, as you can see from the above example and also we have at hand a perfect example of the present state of the conflict between Israel and Palestine, there are no negations going on between the two, so Israel has sent it army into Palestine to get rid of the terrorists there and the Palestinians going into Israel tied with bombs on them selves. As you can see from this essay we can only overcome terrorism by negotiating. There for the government should negotiate with terrorists. Adnan Shah (Danny) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Domestic violence.

    The approach used is to provide timely support and protection, bring perpetrators of violence to justice and to prevent violence. Included is six million pounds worth of funding for projects to reduce crime against women. Proposals for a new twenty four-hour help line for women, six point three million pounds

  2. Analysis of speech extract: Tony Blair

    There are only two verbs in this speech extract; "spreads" and "profess". They are both transitive, present tense, third person verbs. "Spreads" is plural, and "profess" is singular There are a huge amount of connotations in this speech. Almost every word provokes thoughts, images and ideas in one's mind, and

  1. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    causing the violence do not stop then he looks like he is out of control of his own people. Source H is explaining what life was like on Robben Island but in the second source it an Australian journalist talks to Mandela and asks him what life was like.

  2. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    message to the rest of the world that has left virtually no country unaffected. As such, this has become the focus of our research and objective of our study; to identify the current policy, global objectives, and security concerns of the United States regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction and how

  1. Christians in developed countries.

    The Final Judgment tells us and explains that if we do not use the responsibilities of the Christian faith to help those in need, we shall be punished. In this passage God tells the righteous people that whenever they

  2. Compare how the construction of your chosen scenes illustrates different approaches to screen violence. ...

    The crowd circling the fight are all shouting and jeering, this again has been emphasised to create a brutal atmosphere. When Tyler begins to fight, the sound of the crowd is muffled and all we can hear is the fighting.

  1. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    Britain fought against Germany because they were being unfair. 3) The war was declared to prevent Hitler from entering other areas. 4) Britain had tried to previously appease Germany, but it had not worked. 5) Peace was re-established. Most Christians also believe that wars are permitted if they are holy wars.

  2. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    We weren't particularly worried about him using weapons of mass destruction then and he is significantly weaker and less technologically supported than he was then. So why is it we feel it necessary to go to war with him now?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work