• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Arguments Against Euthanasia

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Arguments Against Euthanasia 1. Euthanasia would not only be for people who are "terminally ill" 2. Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment 3. Euthanasia will become non-voluntary 4. Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life 1. Euthanasia would not only be for people who are "terminally ill." There are two problems here -- the definition of "terminal" and the changes that have already taken place to extend euthanasia to those who aren't "terminally ill." There are many definitions for the word "terminal." For example, when he spoke to the National Press Club in 1992, Jack Kevorkian said that a terminal illness was "any disease that curtails life even for a day." The co-founder of the Hemlock Society often refers to "terminal old age." Some laws define "terminal" condition as one from which death will occur in a "relatively short time." Others state that "terminal" means that death is expected within six months or less. Even where a specific life expectancy (like six months) is referred to, medical experts acknowledge that it is virtually impossible to predict the life expectancy of a particular patient. Some people diagnosed as terminally ill don't die for years, if at all, from the diagnosed condition. Increasingly, however, euthanasia activists have dropped references to terminal illness, replacing them with such phrases as "hopelessly ill," "desperately ill," "incurably ill," "hopeless condition," and "meaningless life." ...read more.

Middle

In Canada, hospital stays are being shortened while, at the same time, funds have not been made available for home care for the sick and elderly. Registered nurses are being replaced with less expensive practical nurses. Patients are forced to endure long waits for many types of needed surgery. 1 3. Euthanasia will only be voluntary, they say Emotional and psychological pressures could become overpowering for depressed or dependent people. If the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death. Financial considerations, added to the concern about "being a burden," could serve as powerful forces that would lead a person to "choose" euthanasia or assisted suicide. People for euthanasia say that voluntary euthanasia will not lead to involuntary euthanasia. They look at things as simply black and white. In real life there would be millions of situations each year where cases would not fall clearly into either category. Here are two: Example 1: an elderly person in a nursing home, who can barely understand a breakfast menu, is asked to sign a form consenting to be killed. Is this voluntary or involuntary? Will they be protected by the law? How? Right now the overall prohibition on killing stands in the way. Once one signature can sign away a person's life, what can be as strong a protection as the current absolute prohibition on direct killing? ...read more.

Conclusion

You don't need to be against abortion to appreciate the way the laws on abortion have changed and to see how it could well happen the same way with euthanasia/assisted suicide as soon as the door is opened to make it legal. 4. Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life. People who support euthanasia often say that it is already considered permissable to take human life under some circumstances such as self defense - but they miss the point that when one kills for self defense they are saving innocent life - either their own or someone else's. With euthanasia no one's life is being saved - life is only taken. History has taught us the dangers of euthanasia and that is why there are only two countries in the world today where it is legal. That is why almost all societies - even non-religious ones - for thousands of years have made euthanasia a crime. It is remarkable that euthanasia advocates today think they know better than the billions of people throughout history who have outlawed euthanasia - what makes the 50 year old euthanasia supporters in 2005 so wise that they think they can discard the accumulated wisdom of almost all societies of all time and open the door to the killing of innocent people? Have things changed? If they have, they are changes that should logically reduce the call for euthanasia - pain control medicines and procedure are far better than they have ever been any time in history. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Secondary data is evidence which you collect from a sauce which already exists and is someone else's work. This could be through the internet, books or newspapers etc. For example, I would find out that Hindus have mixed views on Euthanasia through the internet, this is secondary data.

  2. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    I would now like to bring a political view into the picture. Naturally, the British system as it is will not allocate for factors such as love and other general emotions, this is merely how I would handle an individual situation and how I would advise others to handle it.

  1. What is meant by euthanasia?

    the case with Tony Bland. Some say that it is wrong because we shouldn't take extreme measures to keep someone alive but others argue that there have been cases where people who are in PVS and their life depend on the life support machine do come round.

  2. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    by withholding treatment Yes 68% No 31% b. by withdrawing treatment Yes 67% No `32% c) by administering pain killers in the knowledge that they are likely to shorten life? Yes 60% No 37% d) by prescribing lethal drugs for patients to take themselves? Yes 18% No 75% Do you believe in a patient's right to die?

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    We all have a right to a quality of a life. If there is no quality of life left, what is the point of living. My Father would have this point of view and agree to Euthanasia performed on a loved one if they were seen to be in pain.

  2. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    History has shown clearly that once voluntary euthanasia is legal, involuntary euthanasia follows. The British House of Lords recently recommended no change to the law on euthanasia after an extensive enquiry and in view of increasing public interest in euthanasia.

  1. Is Euthanasia accepted within Society? ...

    may consider that, their quality of life has been reduced and they may not want to continue living. Anybody who's had a family member with cancer or any other long-term disease knows that it is a real challenge to the mind as well as the body.

  2. Abortion has been used throughout the world for thousands of years. Discuss.

    If women are to enjoy a healthy, happy life and to offer the same to any children they may have, they need to be able to exercise control over their reproductive lives. Not all women are able to use contraception effectively at all times.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work