• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Arguments against the death penalty

Extracts from this document...


Arguments against the death penalty The opposition to the death penalty developed in America. Edward Livingston articulated many of the classic arguments against the death penalty as early as 1822 in his quest to eliminate death penalty in Louisiana. Although, the classic arguments, pros and cons have been re-examined and refined over the years. A person forfeits his right to life when he kills the death penalty can be viewed as a retributive act. The defendant should be allowed to feel what the defendant himself had put the victim through. The death penalty deters murder and is just retribution. The death penalty deters murder by literally putting the fear of death into 'would be' killers. A person is less likely to do something, if he or she thinks that harm will come to him. ...read more.


It is a fair trade-off to execute murderers on the chance that innocent lives will thereby be saved. If we only save one precious life, capital punishment is justified. The death penalty ultimately saves precious lives and serves a definite purpose. However in order to serve its purpose it must be adjusted and made more effective and efficient. The world needs a uniform standard for deciding who receives the death penalty, the death penalty should be decided by a jury, the death penalty should become the standard punishment for murder, and the death penalty should be helped to truly deter crime. Fear of death deters people from committing crimes proponent say. They also believe that if attached to certain crimes, the penalty of death exerts a positive moral influence by placing a stigma on certain crimes like manslaughter, resulting in attitudes of disgust and horror to such acts. ...read more.


The death penalty is indefensible as a way to punish people in a civilized nation. The Prime Minister is further quoted as saying that the region "cannot allow any power to dictate what should be (the) law and what should be the penalties. Well-meaning people can challenge moral and unjust laws from any region, country or tribe and the death penalty is immoral, reprehensible and unjust. Laws supporting Jim Crow or discrimination in the Southern regions of the United States were challenged and questioned by men and women with fortitude, guts and moral outrage. So too must the death penalty be challenged. The Prime Minister made the same mistake that death penalty advocates make, namely that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime. Not only is this argument mistaken, it is not borne out by research. Yes, Mr. Prime Minister, powers higher can, will, and should challenge this unjust, immoral and murderous law and its penalties, from within and without the borders of Jamaica. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    have benefited him and only keeps what is necessary for him to live.14 It is a very post Hellenistic communist way of thinking and one that was unheard of at the time although the Epicureans did refuse to be a part of politics but a part of the community.

  2. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    and contract murder (New Jersey). Following the result of death penalty as the charge, there are several different types of execution, again depending on the state where the defendant is sentenced. These types are electrocution, the gas chamber, lethal injection, hanging and death by firing squad.

  1. The death penalty

    or the reality of, his or her punishment - violates the U.S. Constitution The US is not following these conventions or declarations and can chose not to because, international law cannot be legally enforced and it is up to the good will of the nation to abide by it.

  2. Discuss the arguments for and against the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder.

    (Hudson 1996: 46.) There are many arguments against the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder. One important factor is that of human rights. Hudson (1996: 70)

  1. The death penalty; Can the death penalty be part of a civilized society?

    In Utah, the alternative method of execution is the lethal injection but the prison may choose which method he prefers. J.A. Taylor volunteered to be fired upon after he cut in peaces and burnt a woman to death after he raped her.

  2. Speed Kills.

    old drivers involved excessive speed on the part of the young driver. Speed surveys show 15 percent of cars are exceeding 110km/h on the open road. The faster you travel on a road, the more likely you are to crash.

  1. According to the affirmitive team, the death penalty is a contradiction of the constitution.

    The current population of the U.S. is 275 million according to the census bureau taken every ten years. Therefore, 14.5 million people in the U.S. are unemployed, many on welfare. The manufacturing of raw goods by prison inmates would definitely have an inflating effect on the current unemployment rate.

  2. Discuss the Arguments For and Against the Reintroduction of the Death Penalty For Murder

    Hood, 1989). With regards to retribution, those who commit crime deserve to be punished, execution is a very real punishment with the criminal being made to suffer in proportion to the offence committed (www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6142/thoughts.html). "It is necessary to distinguish two different, although often related, conceptions of general deterrence" (R.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work