• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Arguments against the death penalty

Extracts from this document...


Arguments against the death penalty The opposition to the death penalty developed in America. Edward Livingston articulated many of the classic arguments against the death penalty as early as 1822 in his quest to eliminate death penalty in Louisiana. Although, the classic arguments, pros and cons have been re-examined and refined over the years. A person forfeits his right to life when he kills the death penalty can be viewed as a retributive act. The defendant should be allowed to feel what the defendant himself had put the victim through. The death penalty deters murder and is just retribution. The death penalty deters murder by literally putting the fear of death into 'would be' killers. A person is less likely to do something, if he or she thinks that harm will come to him. ...read more.


It is a fair trade-off to execute murderers on the chance that innocent lives will thereby be saved. If we only save one precious life, capital punishment is justified. The death penalty ultimately saves precious lives and serves a definite purpose. However in order to serve its purpose it must be adjusted and made more effective and efficient. The world needs a uniform standard for deciding who receives the death penalty, the death penalty should be decided by a jury, the death penalty should become the standard punishment for murder, and the death penalty should be helped to truly deter crime. Fear of death deters people from committing crimes proponent say. They also believe that if attached to certain crimes, the penalty of death exerts a positive moral influence by placing a stigma on certain crimes like manslaughter, resulting in attitudes of disgust and horror to such acts. ...read more.


The death penalty is indefensible as a way to punish people in a civilized nation. The Prime Minister is further quoted as saying that the region "cannot allow any power to dictate what should be (the) law and what should be the penalties. Well-meaning people can challenge moral and unjust laws from any region, country or tribe and the death penalty is immoral, reprehensible and unjust. Laws supporting Jim Crow or discrimination in the Southern regions of the United States were challenged and questioned by men and women with fortitude, guts and moral outrage. So too must the death penalty be challenged. The Prime Minister made the same mistake that death penalty advocates make, namely that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime. Not only is this argument mistaken, it is not borne out by research. Yes, Mr. Prime Minister, powers higher can, will, and should challenge this unjust, immoral and murderous law and its penalties, from within and without the borders of Jamaica. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Outline the arguments for and against life after death? Assess the significance of the ...

    An alternative to dualism is monism, which, is the view that the mind and body are of one and the same nature. The last view of life after death is resurrection, which falls into the notion of monism. This is the view held that after death the body disintegrates and one day God will recreate the dead human individual.

  2. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    and contract murder (New Jersey). Following the result of death penalty as the charge, there are several different types of execution, again depending on the state where the defendant is sentenced. These types are electrocution, the gas chamber, lethal injection, hanging and death by firing squad.

  1. Let's Give murderers What they Deserve - the Death penalty.Explain the arguments for and ...

    Evans' face. An overpowering stench of burnt flesh and clothing began pervading the witness room. Two doctors examined Mr. Evans and declared that he was not dead. The electrode on the left leg was refastened.... Mr. Evans was administered a second thirty second jolt of electricity.

  2. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    "He goes most readily to meet tomorrow who needs tomorrow least."8 The Epicurean Philodemus, author of 'Choices', thinks that one should have control of their feelings as they lead to actions, " our lives could be governed successfully by observing appearances".9 He argues against Epicureans notion of happiness and that

  1. Death Penalty

    So, Many argue that death is more humane then spending your live in these conditions. This is a strong argument for the death penalty. Legal arguments Is the Death Penalty a deterrent? Fear of death deters people from committing crimes proponent say They also believe that if attached to certain

  2. Speed Kills.

    ...and we can prove it Evidence of the speed/crash relationship has been demonstrated in the following studies: Between 1987 and 1988, 40 States in the United States of America raised the speed limit on interstate highways from 55mph (88km/h)

  1. The death penalty; Can the death penalty be part of a civilized society?

    For some reason, it didn't surprise me at all that the chief executive would carry out an execution himself. The reason was that I understood that it was the eighteenth century and that's how it was during those times. Some would agree that we have evolved from hanging and firing squads, unfortunately we haven't.

  2. Death penalty.

    Effects When the death penalty is used to punish, many questions rise among people. In the United States of America, the majority agrees that it was a necessity to enforce this law. Although it does seem that killing a person that is dangerous for society is the right thing to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work