• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Critically the Claim that the Concept of Supremely Perfect Being is Incoherent.

Extracts from this document...


Assess Critically the Claim that the Concept of Supremely Perfect Being is Incoherent. A Supremely Perfect Being is one who is Omnipotent, Transcendent, Omniscient, Omnipresent and Omni benevolent. However, these attributes in cohere with each other for many reasons, such as Omniscience and Omnipotence. The meaning of Incoherency is when there is a lack of logical organisation in the way something is thought out or expressed that makes it difficult to understand, for example it is difficult to understand a bachelor to be a married man. To say a Supremely Perfect Being is Omnipotent (all-powerful) brings the consequence that they can do everything including the logically impossible such us bring it about that two plus two equals four, or make a four-sided triangle. Let's assume the Paradox of the Stone, if a Supremely Perfect Being is Omnipotent, then they could create a stone too heavy, that even they could not lift. Though since they could not lift it, means there is something they could not do, then they are therefore not omnipotent. On the other hand, if they cannot create such a heavy stone, because they can lift all possible stones, they are not omnipotent because there is something they cannot do. Either way it looks as though, a Supremely Perfect Being cannot be Omnipotent. ...read more.


Meaning that a Supremely Perfect Being is timeless (outside of time), and does not know things which are future for them. Since for them there is no past, present or future. However, a problem with this suggestion is that if a Supremely Perfect Being's knowledge is in one eternal present, it makes all events simultaneous for a Supremely Perfect Being, and means that they cannot know simple tensed propositions such as 'WW2 happened before I was born'. Really, the idea that the past, present and future is going all at the same time seems incoherent. Another suggestion was that a Supremely Perfect Being, chose to do without certain bits of knowledge, so that we can still be free. On this understanding a Supremely Perfect Being has decided to be ignorant of future contingents in order they still be contingents. However, being ignorant of things that it is possible to know (even though only probably possible for only a Supremely Perfect Being to know) is not to be omniscient. Either way, for a Supremely Perfect being to be omniscient is incoherent. From another viewpoint, if a Supremely Perfect Being is omniscient, then they know future contingents, but if they knew in the future that there was to be evil, then it is right to say, do they not have the power to stop it, if they were also omnipotent. ...read more.


In consequence we cannot fully grasp what anything would be like that was completely beyond the physical universe. This raises the issue that a Supremely Perfect Being is outside our understanding and therefore cannot have any meaningful grasp of the idea of a Supremely Perfect Being or a Supremely Perfect Being's attributes. An answer would be that we are able to have an unfinished grasp of what a Supremely Perfect Being is like and we can talk meaningfully about the attributes, however in a metaphorical way, for example 'A Supremely Perfect Being is a star'. But most metaphors can be explained, made literal, thought it isn't clear what 'A Supremely Perfect Being is a star' might literally mean. If we were to say a Supremely Perfect Being is Transcendent, then they are immaterial and exist outside time, meaning they are not subject to the laws of physics. Yet, if a Supremely Perfect Being is out of time, then they are not Omnipresent (everywhere). So Omnipresence and Transcendence are incoherent, because if a Supremely Perfect Being was transcendent they would be out of the natural world, but since they are omnipresence they are everywhere. In conclusion the notion of a Supremely Perfect Being is incoherent because all the attributes, Omnipotent, Transcendent, Omniscient, Omnipresent and Omni benevolent, which a Supremely perfect being possesses either in coheres individually such as Omnipotence and Omnipresence. Or in cohere with each other such as Omnipotence and Omni benevolence. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    God as a character is forgiving. So to become a person of great spiritual wealth, Christians know that they must forgive. Christians are instructed to forgive because God forgave them-the all good forgave them, if they do not forgive then they are not all good.

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    Arguments from religious experiences to the existence of God can thus be met with arguments from atheist experiences to the non-existence of God; which will result in, presumably, a tie, other things being equal. Swinburne responds to this objection by arguing that this negative principal of credulity is false.

  1. Examine the claim that one day science will be able to explain everything.

    One of the most major conflicts between science and religion, is creation. In the Bible, Genesis, states that God created the Earth in six days. First day: The universe is created ("In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth").

  2. Discuss critically the advantages and disadvantages of accepting that New Testament texts are literal.

    However, a literalist may disregard no single part of the Bible, and thus, this can cause difficulties when there appears to be conflict between biblical passages. There are further examples of conflict, with Moses giving the right to revenge, yet Jesus condemning violence.

  1. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    Throughout the novel the reader is aware that Scobie is desperate for peace and to be on his own, yet his anxiety for his wife's happiness is always on his conscience, and invades his dreams. Another relationship, which is also a significant part of the novel, is Scobie's love affair with young Helen Rolt.

  2. Critically Assess the Claim that the Idea of God is Innate

    This cause must be God, and so God must exist. The essential structure of the argument is as follows; the cause of anything must at least be as perfect as its effect. My ideas must be caused by something. I am imperfect being.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work