• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Critically the Claim that the Concept of Supremely Perfect Being is Incoherent.

Extracts from this document...


Assess Critically the Claim that the Concept of Supremely Perfect Being is Incoherent. A Supremely Perfect Being is one who is Omnipotent, Transcendent, Omniscient, Omnipresent and Omni benevolent. However, these attributes in cohere with each other for many reasons, such as Omniscience and Omnipotence. The meaning of Incoherency is when there is a lack of logical organisation in the way something is thought out or expressed that makes it difficult to understand, for example it is difficult to understand a bachelor to be a married man. To say a Supremely Perfect Being is Omnipotent (all-powerful) brings the consequence that they can do everything including the logically impossible such us bring it about that two plus two equals four, or make a four-sided triangle. Let's assume the Paradox of the Stone, if a Supremely Perfect Being is Omnipotent, then they could create a stone too heavy, that even they could not lift. Though since they could not lift it, means there is something they could not do, then they are therefore not omnipotent. On the other hand, if they cannot create such a heavy stone, because they can lift all possible stones, they are not omnipotent because there is something they cannot do. Either way it looks as though, a Supremely Perfect Being cannot be Omnipotent. ...read more.


Meaning that a Supremely Perfect Being is timeless (outside of time), and does not know things which are future for them. Since for them there is no past, present or future. However, a problem with this suggestion is that if a Supremely Perfect Being's knowledge is in one eternal present, it makes all events simultaneous for a Supremely Perfect Being, and means that they cannot know simple tensed propositions such as 'WW2 happened before I was born'. Really, the idea that the past, present and future is going all at the same time seems incoherent. Another suggestion was that a Supremely Perfect Being, chose to do without certain bits of knowledge, so that we can still be free. On this understanding a Supremely Perfect Being has decided to be ignorant of future contingents in order they still be contingents. However, being ignorant of things that it is possible to know (even though only probably possible for only a Supremely Perfect Being to know) is not to be omniscient. Either way, for a Supremely Perfect being to be omniscient is incoherent. From another viewpoint, if a Supremely Perfect Being is omniscient, then they know future contingents, but if they knew in the future that there was to be evil, then it is right to say, do they not have the power to stop it, if they were also omnipotent. ...read more.


In consequence we cannot fully grasp what anything would be like that was completely beyond the physical universe. This raises the issue that a Supremely Perfect Being is outside our understanding and therefore cannot have any meaningful grasp of the idea of a Supremely Perfect Being or a Supremely Perfect Being's attributes. An answer would be that we are able to have an unfinished grasp of what a Supremely Perfect Being is like and we can talk meaningfully about the attributes, however in a metaphorical way, for example 'A Supremely Perfect Being is a star'. But most metaphors can be explained, made literal, thought it isn't clear what 'A Supremely Perfect Being is a star' might literally mean. If we were to say a Supremely Perfect Being is Transcendent, then they are immaterial and exist outside time, meaning they are not subject to the laws of physics. Yet, if a Supremely Perfect Being is out of time, then they are not Omnipresent (everywhere). So Omnipresence and Transcendence are incoherent, because if a Supremely Perfect Being was transcendent they would be out of the natural world, but since they are omnipresence they are everywhere. In conclusion the notion of a Supremely Perfect Being is incoherent because all the attributes, Omnipotent, Transcendent, Omniscient, Omnipresent and Omni benevolent, which a Supremely perfect being possesses either in coheres individually such as Omnipotence and Omnipresence. Or in cohere with each other such as Omnipotence and Omni benevolence. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    Influenced by the works of Jesus, Christians pray because they believe that it is essential to life, as it is essential to pray to be a good person. The analogy Jesus used of the wine and branches indicates the necessity of living in constant touch with God.

  2. Examine the claim that one day science will be able to explain everything.

    It may be physically possible to simply talk to God, and ask him about how he made the Earth, and if the stories are in fact true, but it is extremely impossible that he will answer your question. An alternative theory as to the creation of Earth, is the Big Bang theory.

  1. Discuss critically the advantages and disadvantages of accepting that New Testament texts are literal.

    it is not logical to believe they are true, yet it also cannot be falsified (Swinburne). The falsification principle is based on the idea that if conditions cannot be presented where the theory would not work, then it must be accepted as true.

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    James talks about five different types of religious experience. Ineffability; the experience is so unlike anything else that the person cannot describe it to anyone else, James uses the expressions 'the dissolution of the personal ego' and 'a sense of peace and sacredness' and says that these are meaningless to anyone who has not had such an experience.

  1. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    Scobie believes he is responsible for not only the happiness of both the women, but also the personality and looks they possess too: "This is my doing. This is what I've made of her. She wasn't always like this." Scobie's responsibility for Helen is portrayed to be of a sincere

  2. Critically Assess the Claim that the Idea of God is Innate

    We could easily have created our image of God by amplifying our own finite human qualities. From the Trademark Argument Descartes moves on from knowledge of his idea of God in his mind, to the cause of that idea outside of his mind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work