• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Assess Hume's reasons for rejecting miracles."

Extracts from this document...


"Assess Hume's reasons for rejecting miracles." A miracle is held to be an action of God, or an invisible agent, which goes against the laws of nature and has some religious meaning or significance. Miracles have traditionally been taken as validations of religious claims. As the Christians believe in the Bible they say that the miraculous signs and wonders they see testifies that it was God working through him accompanied Jesus' ministry. His resurrection from the dead is seen to be the greatest of these miracles and even till this day it is regularly taken as a sold reason for believing in the existence of God. According to Hume no matter how strong the evidence for a specific miracle maybe, it will always be more reasonable to reject the miracle than to believe in it .He distinguished that there are two factors to consider in deciding whether to believe any given piece of testimony. ...read more.


The evidence to support miraculous events is often contradictory and in Hume's estimation is always tainted with primitive superstition. He described the accounts as being sourced from "ignorant and barbarous" people. However for Hume, a miracle is by definition an event that is unlikely as anything else. He says miracles for him involve violations of laws of nature. Laws of nature are as well established, as it is possible for anything to be. Therefore, Hume says it will be more likely that the testimony of a witness to a miracle is false than it is true. It will always be more rational to disbelieve a claim that a miracle has occurred than to accept it. Hume himself defined miracles as a "violation of law by a supernatural being". He further went on to say that the "laws of nature" are based on past experience. ...read more.


Although many find Hume's arguments persuasive there are also setbacks. Some argue that miracles do not have to be violations of laws of nature. An answered prayer for example may be described as a miracle but it does not violate any natural law. Miracles for the people who believe in them are simply events that point us towards God. Hume argued that accounts of miraculous events should be dismissed as the witnesses lack credibility. Hume's claim that religions base their credibility on miracles is not true. He goes on to say, "apart from the miracles of Jesus (which appear to have been performed out of compassion, rather than to make any claims of authority), none of the mainstream religious movements actually make such a claim." Hume did not mention whatsoever how a person should respond to miracles where they themselves experienced them. Experience of a miracle would count as evidence to the person. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miracles section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miracles essays

  1. R.S. Coursework - miracles

    so much when it is most likely that a miracle would not even take place. They would refer to the bible to support their argument, saying that in Luke9:37-43 the cure of the boy with the seizure. It was only epilepsy and that it can now be cured therefore it wasn't a miracle.

  2. Assess Hume's reasons for rejecting miracles

    On the other hand, Hume was working with Newton's understanding of Natural Laws being fixed whereas the modern understanding is that of the chaos theory. The chaos theory teaches us that the movement of particles is random and therefore exceptions to natural laws are possible.

  1. Examine two philosophical reasons for believing in miracles

    and allows the individual to decide for themselves their interpretation of a miracle. Holland's famous parable of the boy on the railway track explains how different people understand situations: A young child, busily disentangling his toy car from the railway lines, escaped certain death when a train came to a halt only inches away from him.


    This is illustrated by Colin Brown's comment that "In his treatment of miracles Hume was right to insist that belief was proportional to evidence, the problem is not that Hume was too empirical, he was not empirical enough." Brown goes on to criticise Hume for discounting the possibility of physical evidence, concerning events such as the resurrection.

  1. David Hume and Miracles.

    Hence the probability of God performing a miracle is not (directly) dependent on the frequency of which God chooses to perform miracles but rather on his ability to perform them at his own discretion. Hume then continues on this road of folly by equating evidence with probability.

  2. Miracles. Many people have different views on what a miracle really is. For ...

    God continues to bestow upon her extraordinary gifts and charismata: The stigmata, visions of the future or the gift of prophecy, the gift of healing, appearance of a Holy Host in her mouth, emission of scents of flowers and fruits, apparition of rose petals, levitation, bilocation (be in two places at once).

  1. Explain the term 'miracle'

    "In the name of Jesus" they put their arms on a person and heal them. There is some scepticism in this activity but it gives people the freedom to express their belief in different ways. If one of these healing miracles did happen, I think that the general public would

  2. Critically assess Hume's dismissal of miracles.

    Therefore if such historical evidence is not sufficient to prove the occurrence of miracles (which Hume would say it is not), is it then sufficient to prove the certainty of natural laws/scientific evidence? Hume ignores these criticisms and goes on to state four further points as to why miracles are implausible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work