• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess The Strengths / Weaknesses Of Virtue Ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess The Strengths / Weaknesses Of Virtue Ethics The virtue ethicist suggests that his theory avoids the complicated tasks of using a formula to figure out what we ought to do, by instead focusing on the kinds of persons we ought to be. The trouble lies in determining just how we know what kinds of persons we ought to be. Or, we might put it this way: how are we to determine just what the virtues are? Obviously, if we do not know what the virtues are, then telling people to "Live virtuously!" becomes an empty imperative. So, if we ask the virtue ethicist what the virtues are, what will he tell us? Virtue theorists answer this question in at least five different ways. Firstly, some virtue theorists suggest that we will know what the virtues are, we will know what the good life is. Secondly, some virtue theorists suggest instead that we can determine what the virtues are by figuring out what the excellent human life is. ...read more.

Middle

Fourthly, he might simply appeal to a formula like the categorical imperative or the utilitarian calculus. On this theory, he might argue that if we want to know what character traits are the moral ones, we just ask which ones maximise happiness and minimise harm for the greatest number. But this answer, only returns the virtue theorist to the very rule-based theories he tried to resist earlier. On this account virtue ethics just collapses into the rule-based systems. The final way in which the virtue theorist might try to determine what the virtues are that the good man can tell what to do in a morally complicated situation. This is because his habits not only internalise the rules but also give him a special ability to know what is morally appropriate independent of any rational calculus like Kant's. This could be called a form of moral intuitionism: a special faculty of moral intuition develops within a good man. ...read more.

Conclusion

the good action is its own reward. Doing good deeds, even grudgingly, can often produce within us a kind of satisfaction that is worth more than certain pleasures. Similarly, in moral action, we can internalise moral principles simply by doing the morally good deed and through the action itself come to understand its value and begin to desire it. However, virtue theory offers a great deal to moral psychology -it tells us how we in fact learn moral principles. This means that virtue ethics is less a normative theory of what we ought to do than a descriptive account of the limits and capabilities of human beings. If humans are creatures that tend toward habituation, then moral educators would do well to heed this fact in developing a moral curriculum. Then it also raises questions about whether calling virtue theory "ethics" is even appropriate. Since virtue theories fail to offer defensible moral norms that are distinguishable from their normative rivals, virtue theories are not really ethical theories at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain the difference between Meta ethics and Normative ethics.

    The above statements can be both backed up with facts. The ethical naturalists would argue that that you can falsify or verify 'evil' by examining his life. In this theory ethical statements need a universally agreed scale of what is good or what is bad.

  2. Explain Virtue ethics - its strengths and weaknesses?

    Yet you know that you or your wife will have to clean them, and again would mostly likely prefer your wife to clean them. But if you clean the dishes, you will find yourself morally satisfied because even though it is not a pleasant act to do, you know you

  1. Explain how Macintyre's or Aristotle's account of a life lived in accordance with virtues ...

    Consumerism is concerned with style, not character. Virtue ethics demands that we refine our character not purchase an image. The golden mean that Aristotle introduced refers to the idea that an action responding to a particular situation should be done so in the right way at the right time in the right about and for the right reason.

  2. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    My analysis of Christian Aid's work is that it is a very generous, good, and coherent campaign, my reasons for which are as follows. It is a very worthwhile scheme, because certain countries are benefiting from these schemes and

  1. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    This view can be summed up in the utility principle. This principle states that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its "utility" or usefulness. Bentham's hedonic calculus presents us with all sorts of problems when we examine what it attempts to do.

  2. Aristotle - Virtue Ethics Essay

    Many ethical and theories have been put forward in times past to help individuals with the making of moral decisions. Virtue ethics is just one of many others including Kant's ethical theory, Bentham and Mill's utilitarianism, Aquinas' Natural Law and Joseph Fletcher's Situation Ethics.

  1. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    one cannot state that the actual amount of pain is any less for me or any more for her. It is strictly in the individual and each situation can only be evaluated on a contextual basis. Pleasure and pain are solely subjective experiences; there is no accounting or disputing matters of taste.

  2. Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    While one may be able to measure the number of people that benefit, one cannot measure the amount of pleasure that the person experiences. Especially when making decisions in a short space of time the hedonic calculus is not very useful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work