• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess The Strengths / Weaknesses Of Virtue Ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess The Strengths / Weaknesses Of Virtue Ethics The virtue ethicist suggests that his theory avoids the complicated tasks of using a formula to figure out what we ought to do, by instead focusing on the kinds of persons we ought to be. The trouble lies in determining just how we know what kinds of persons we ought to be. Or, we might put it this way: how are we to determine just what the virtues are? Obviously, if we do not know what the virtues are, then telling people to "Live virtuously!" becomes an empty imperative. So, if we ask the virtue ethicist what the virtues are, what will he tell us? Virtue theorists answer this question in at least five different ways. Firstly, some virtue theorists suggest that we will know what the virtues are, we will know what the good life is. Secondly, some virtue theorists suggest instead that we can determine what the virtues are by figuring out what the excellent human life is. ...read more.

Middle

Fourthly, he might simply appeal to a formula like the categorical imperative or the utilitarian calculus. On this theory, he might argue that if we want to know what character traits are the moral ones, we just ask which ones maximise happiness and minimise harm for the greatest number. But this answer, only returns the virtue theorist to the very rule-based theories he tried to resist earlier. On this account virtue ethics just collapses into the rule-based systems. The final way in which the virtue theorist might try to determine what the virtues are that the good man can tell what to do in a morally complicated situation. This is because his habits not only internalise the rules but also give him a special ability to know what is morally appropriate independent of any rational calculus like Kant's. This could be called a form of moral intuitionism: a special faculty of moral intuition develops within a good man. ...read more.

Conclusion

the good action is its own reward. Doing good deeds, even grudgingly, can often produce within us a kind of satisfaction that is worth more than certain pleasures. Similarly, in moral action, we can internalise moral principles simply by doing the morally good deed and through the action itself come to understand its value and begin to desire it. However, virtue theory offers a great deal to moral psychology -it tells us how we in fact learn moral principles. This means that virtue ethics is less a normative theory of what we ought to do than a descriptive account of the limits and capabilities of human beings. If humans are creatures that tend toward habituation, then moral educators would do well to heed this fact in developing a moral curriculum. Then it also raises questions about whether calling virtue theory "ethics" is even appropriate. Since virtue theories fail to offer defensible moral norms that are distinguishable from their normative rivals, virtue theories are not really ethical theories at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain the difference between Meta ethics and Normative ethics.

    The above statements can be both backed up with facts. The ethical naturalists would argue that that you can falsify or verify 'evil' by examining his life. In this theory ethical statements need a universally agreed scale of what is good or what is bad.

  2. Explain Virtue ethics - its strengths and weaknesses?

    Yet you know that you or your wife will have to clean them, and again would mostly likely prefer your wife to clean them. But if you clean the dishes, you will find yourself morally satisfied because even though it is not a pleasant act to do, you know you

  1. Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    While one may be able to measure the number of people that benefit, one cannot measure the amount of pleasure that the person experiences. Especially when making decisions in a short space of time the hedonic calculus is not very useful.

  2. How Does Virtue Ethics apply to Business Ethics?

    use this to find out what it takes to be a good serial killer and the traits needed, which the police force currently do. He has taken it away from the key matter; what's more his virtues he decides are only ones we already have.

  1. Aristotle's Virtue Ethics

    It is not necessary to constantly tone down your feelings, and it is sometimes good to express strong emotions. Even a virtuous person has the right to extreme anger once in a while.

  2. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    The funny thing about humans is our capacity to distinguish what we like and what we don't like. There is no one who can determine another's capacity for pain or suffering. If my getting a tattoo feels great, and my friend's getting a tattoo makes her faint from the pain,

  1. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    The divisions were from Hume (morality is an expression), Kant (narrow emphasis on reason) and Kierkegaard (individual choice). Macintyre believed that we cross roads between supreme individualism and community, and community dependant on morality. He maintains that the choice is already made up as all communities depend on virtues or they will fail.

  2. What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point ...

    are in fact "absolutes", colonisation was a prime example of this, with European settlers enslaving, slaughtering, and imprisoning natives because they knew how the natives ought to live, as the settlers' moral knowledge was "absolute". However the defence for absolutism is similar to a criticism for relativism, in that the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work