• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Assess the view that religious language is meaningless."

Extracts from this document...


Sandy Ritchie 10th October 2002 "Assess the view that religious language is meaningless." In recent times one of the most compelling and interesting arguments against God and religion has come from linguistic philosophy. In very basic terms the argument points out the fact that religion must necessarily use language in order to express abstract ideas such as God, love and so on, and in doing so commits a fallacy because as soon as such ideas are put into words they become meaningless. However, this is a rather large generalisation; the specific arguments go into a lot more detail and most vary in some way from this basic idea. Before we look at these arguments, though, I feel it is necessary to emphasise just how important an argument this is for religious believers, as it shakes the very foundations of religion. Religious language has until recently been taken as unequivocal, absolute truth, and to deny that its meaning is not completely true in all senses is a huge and brave step on the part of philosophy, as without language much of religion simply would not function. In the course of this essay I intend to examine and assess logical positivism, put forward by the Vienna Circle thinkers, which links in with verification. Then I will examine the criticisms and challenges to this argument, followed by its complete rejection by Wittgenstein, and then I will go on to falsification and its criticisms. ...read more.


The other major challenge against meaningful religious statements, which bears a lot of resemblance to the first, is the falsification principle. This is a kind of development of the verification principle in that it incorporates the ideas of the logical positivists into its argument. It was first put forward by Anthony Flew in the 1950s. He said that since statements can be verified as true, they must also be able to be falsified as, well, false. However, he believed that religious statements cannot be falsified because whenever there arises some evidence against a religious belief the believers simply qualify their belief under other terms, so their belief in, say, God dies "the death of a thousand qualifications". Flew used John Wisdom's Parable of the Gardener to explain his theory. I will briefly paraphrase it to save time. Two people come upon a garden that shows some signs of order, and yet others of randomness and disorder. One of the people believes that there is a gardener at work in the garden, but the other points out that there is absolutely no sign of him except in the fact that there are signs of order in the garden. Both people are looking at exactly the same garden with exactly the same ratio of order to disorder, and yet one concludes that there is an invisible, intangible, eternally elusive gardener, while the other concludes that there is no gardener at all. ...read more.


Language games are not restricted to entire cultures; there can be many games within a culture, which an outsider would simply not be able to understand. A good example of a game like this is religion. It has it own rules or uses for words, so the only people who can truly understand their full meaning are those taking part. However, problems with this vie include the fact that if it were true dialogue between religions would be impossible, as they would be mutually incomprehensible, religious believers are not all monks and nuns; they are involved in many aspects of life and none of the games they take part in are mutually exclusive, and finally non-believers may have a better view of religious language because they have an objective standpoint from which to view religion. From all of this it seems to me that religious language is faced with much criticism despite the fact that it has done nothing really very wrong. We all know how difficult it is to talk about God and other supernatural metaphysical religious ideas, but just because they cannot be defined or justified in this world does not mean they have no significance. They not only putting people on the right moral track, they are and have had a long history of being guides and gurus for millions of people over the years, and to dismiss them on the grounds that they are improvable is to reject thousands of years of human moral and linguistic development. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Religion in the Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Religion in the Media essays

  1. The falsification principle offers no real challenge to religious beliefs

    However, Hare fails to explain how non-assertions can be right or wrong. Criticising this non-cognitivistic approach, John Hick argues that, a serious and rational concern with religion will inevitably make us want to know whether the way the believer feels and acts is appropriate to the actual character of the

  2. Discuss the merits of theories of secularisation with regard to religion in modern Britain

    not be overlooked: In Britain, for example, Muslims and Jews have higher levels of religious practice which may reflect feelings of persecution, common cultural identity in a "hostile" world and so forth A further aspect to this idea relates to the Church as a focus for political dissent in societies that do not allow freedom of political expression and assembly.

  1. Assess the sociological for / against view of secularisation occurring.

    Rates of attendance in Catholics in the USA did decline in the 1960s and early 1970s, but had not fallen any further. For example, in 1991 a poll conducted by Princeton Religious Research Centre found that 42 per cent of Americans claimed to have attended a church or synagogue in

  2. Is There A Decline In Religion...In Today's Society?

    I looked at and focused on a range of relevant sociological features, but I worked using headings and therefore if I noticed a feature that would not fit under a labelled heading, I would tend to ignore it. I feel my evidence was straight to the point and I supported and explained each point I made.

  1. Television in the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's

    People did not always like these new changes. The BBC was accused of encouraging immorality and campaigners began to complain. Campaigns were launched to try to force TV to censor programmes. TV began to show more sex scenes, which produced strong reactions and criticism from the public.

  2. 'Modern Britain is now a Secular Society.' To what extent do Sociological arguments and ...

    Membership of some non-Christian churches and other religious organisations has been increasing. Much of this increase is accounted for by the rises in the numbers of Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Scientologists (Cult?). Some other groups, including Theosophists, Unitarian churches and Spiritualists have declined.

  1. Televisions representation of religious people.

    George then realises he is wrong and the family are happy again. The film gives the impression that all Asian families force their children to have an arranged marriage, which is totally untrue. There is also the fact that a Muslim married a Christian woman.

  2. Religion in the workplace: implications for managers.

    The court said it required government to make theological judgments about religious law and practice, which violated the concept of separation of church and state. The Massachusetts Legislature is reworking the statute. Three executives at Briggs & Stratton Corp., a small-engine manufacturer in Wisconsin, have sued The National Catholic Reporter for $30 million.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work