• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Because God is Good, we are moved to do Good' - Discuss with reference to Aristotle's concept of God on the Final cause.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sara Penny Philosophy 'Because God is Good, we are moved to do Good' - Discuss with reference to Aristotle's concept of God on the Final cause: Aristotle believed that everybody is directed towards a final aim, and that there is a purpose to everything we do. He believed that within this aim there were superior and subordinate aims. Subordinate aims were what you had to achieve to obtain the superior aim. There are even more superior aims above those. For Aristotle the final aim was the good of all humanity. He believed that every person was of a group whether it be your family, your village, your city, or your country, therefore Aristotle concluded that nobody is truly individual. ...read more.

Middle

But most people are happy with a variety of cultures and races). To overcome this problem, Aristotle placed people into three categories; - Those who love pleasure (most people) - Those who love honour (politicians) and - Those who love contemplation (philosophers). Aristotle contended the four causes, which explained why something existed the way that it did. These consisted of the material cause; what something is made of, the efficient cause; what brought it into being, the formal cause; characteristics that determine its categorisation and the final cause; what it is for. The final cause is the most important cause as when the purpose or end, telos, is known we are able to see somethings full perfection. ...read more.

Conclusion

Aristotle named this being as God. He believed that God was the efficient and final cause of the universe, on whom all creation depended and who was the source of justice, truth, beauty and goodness. However, God was not to be considered in a personal way and has no need for the universe or its contents. Aristotle thought that God was extremely happy because he contemplates himself. He is unlike everything else in the universe as he has no potential to change. For Aristotle God was a being that never did anything, he neither creates or sustains. Peter Vardy stated Aristotle's God is the cause in the form of the 'Great Attractor'. He attracts all things as he is supremely good. We are attracted to him as our final aim is to be with him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Deconstructing O'Connor's "A Good Man Is Hard to Find".

    You're one of my own children", and ultimately rests in peace: 'her [childlike] face smiling up at the cloudless sky'. Ironically, the grandma's bad influences become evident upon her murderer. The Misfit, in other words, is bewitched by the old lady's hypocritical soul.

  2. Aristotle believed that everything has a cause. He saw four different explanations for ...

    The Prime Mover attracts the movers and it's the final goal or purpose towards which all material things move towards. This prime Mover could not be made of anything physical. 'Stuff' in the material world is subject to change and decay, and the Prime Mover cannot be subject to change.

  1. Is God really there? If he is, does he care? And if he does, ...

    This story of Job you would think would go some way to proving that suffering is not a punishment, as with Job, it just brought him a deeper and more meaningful understanding of God. Still however it is often viewed as a punishment, a way for God to retaliate for humanity's sin.

  2. Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'.

    He also wondered whether something could have matter but no form, and he concluded that it could. There can be prime matter, or stuff that ahs no particular form, it is not organized into any structure. He also raised the question whether there could be a substance with form but no matter, and he concluded that this is God.

  1. Describe Aristotle's teaching about the difference between the final cause and other sorts of ...

    The second level of "cause" is "efficient cause". This defines the method by which an object was formed. The "efficient cause" of the statue would be the sculptor, or more precisely the process of sculpting. The third level is "formal cause" describes the characteristics possessed by an object.

  2. Arguments about god.

    This indicates that the universe is as a result of random chance, not clever design. And then it spirals back to the question of whether we have a malevolent or incompetent God. Then again, this point of view is flawed because if the animal kingdom were all balanced equally, none of the species would survive.

  1. God does not play dice, discuss.

    the world is not completely random and chaotic, hence the world must have been designed by supreme being who enforced order. The second argument is similar to William Paley's design qua purpose theory. It related the fact that the inorganic world sustains life on a basic level to the notion that god designed it for this very purpose.

  2. Assess Critically the Claim that the Concept of Supremely Perfect Being is Incoherent.

    In saying so implies that they have a mind, which implies that they have a brain and a brain is physical, but we can say that a Supremely Perfect Being transcends the physical, and can imagine ideas or have knowledge without a brain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work