"Belief in the resurrection has more to do with wishful thinking than with historical fact" Do you agree?

Authors Avatar

(iii) “Belief in the resurrection has more to do with wishful thinking than with historical fact” Do you agree?

I believe that this statement is correct. The resurrection is very hard to believe nowadays because of modern science and the points of view of many philosophers. A man rising from the dead is very hard to believe as from modern science we know that this is not physically possible. Once you’re dead, you’re dead and there is no possible way to be resurrected after death.

        There are also many other reasons why I do not believe these statements to be correct. Points of view from Philosophers such as Sigmund Freud have beliefs which I can relate to very well. Sigmund Freud believes that the reason people are religious is because they need something else to look forward to after death. Also he believes that people, when they are younger, look up to their parents and see them as ‘all powerful’, as you look up to them, but as you get older you realise that they are just normal people and you need something larger to look up to. Jesus, and God, is something people need to have in order to look up to them and hope that there is something after death.

Join now!

        However others may have different points of view. Christians would say that Jesus was the physical God so therefore he would have the power to do the impossible, bring a dead man back to life. As Norman Geisler says in his book ‘The counterfeit gospel of Mormonism’, ‘While Christ’s resurrection body is more than mortal; it is not less than physical’. Meaning that even though Christ wasn’t mortal on earth he still was physical, he still was a man and had the ability to die. Christians believe that Christ conquered one of mans greatest fears in defeating death and they ...

This is a preview of the whole essay