• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"BY DEFINITION MIRACLES DO NOT OCCUR" DISCUSS

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"BY DEFINITION MIRACLES DO NOT OCCUR" DISCUSS. Tom McKeown. Even in this modern age, belief in the miraculous is widespread and is a feature of many world religions, including the Christian faith where miracles have played a significant role. It is important attempt to define what a miracle is, as this in itself is a source for debate. Today the term 'miracle' in many different ways and the idea is open to many interpretations. A miracle can be defined in a number of ways, firstly as an unexpected change for the better. This centres miracles in people's treatment of each other, not necessarily demanding the idea of a creator God, although it can be interpreted as being God's action (here a change can be deemed as a miracle by one, whereas another might not). This is the only type of miracle that an anti-realist (e.g. Moore, Sutherland etc) could believe in. in as we use the word is used in many different ways and is open to many interpretations. Miracles can also be defined as Religiously Significant 'natural' Events, where a believer interprets an event of being of Religious significance, perhaps rare events like a total eclipse, or more common one's such as a rainbow. Events such as these could be caused by God, either in accordance with natural laws or brought about through another person. ...read more.

Middle

is widely seen as being his strongest argument against miracles. Here Hume reasons that it would be impossible for us to prove an event was miraculous because any such event would have to outweigh all of humanity's accumulated experience (the experiences of millions of people over thousands of years). This can be criticised as a circular argument, which does not actually say that miracles do not happen just that Hume can't believe it. The first of Hume's a posteriori (psychological) arguments, the argument from insufficient witness, argued that to believe in miracles it was necessary for there to be, a substantial number of witnesses, witnesses of higher credibility, of good sense, education, integrity etc. Hume reasoned that there was not a single miracle recorded in history by such witnesses as these. In Hume's second psychological argument, the argument from ignorance, Hume ascertained that miracles usually came from "ignorant and barbarous nations" and claimed this formed a "strong presumption against all supernatural and miraculous relations". Hume's third psychological argument is that people are drawn towards the sensational, noting peoples tendency to exaggerate and that many had a desire to believe. Hume claimed that witnesses if miracles were guilty of wish fulfilment (in this subject his ideas anticipated those of Freud and Marx). ...read more.

Conclusion

Secondly, many recognise false prophets and lastly, recognition of miracles does not necessarily lead to truth claims (Jesus played down their significance in his ministry). Perhaps the main invalidating argument to Hume's challenge is John Hick's reasoning that 'all routes lead to God', that miracles are caused by just one God that all religions lead up to. There are several other arguments in defence of miracles. One such defence being that if there is reasonable evidence the existence of an omnipotent Christian God that governs natural laws, one such definition of a miracle, then a logical argument can be made for belief in miracles (although this opens up the question whether such a God does exist. Furthermore, if as Thomas Aquinas suggested, miracles might occur within the system of natural activity, then how are we to tell when a miracle has occurred. In addition to this it should be pointed out that scientific explanations do not rule out theological explanations. I believe that the statement "By definition miracles do not occur" is simplistic and problematic for many reasons, as there is great difficulty in actually defining what a miracle is and the arguments that attempt to prove this, such as Hume's a priori argument, are deeply flawed and open to much criticism. Thus I find it is impossible to dismiss Miracles as false by definition, but believe that the evidence must be looked at, "a good scientist looks at the evidence" (Polkinghorne). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miracles section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miracles essays

  1. Miracles are about faith, not fact. Discuss.

    was if its non-occurrence were more miraculous than its occurrence and it was witnessed by enough people of good character11. He said "a wise man proportions his beliefs to the evidence", past experience is a reliable guide for this. This past experience tells us that miracles are contrary to human reasoning.

  2. What are Miracles?

    They will just see it as an example of God working through Jesus, as a demonstration of Jesus' power, the fact that he has control over the law of nature. A liberal interpretation of this would be different; they would believe that the story was not meant to be taken literally, but to present the readers with a message.

  1. Analysis of 'Young Goodman Brown'

    Brown claims that he is a religious man and that he can't be converted to the path of evil, yet here he is conversing with the devil. Once he finds out he decides to stay put and not to continue on, making us think that maybe he does have a

  2. Miracles. Many people have different views on what a miracle really is. For ...

    He showed that the power of God was stronger than death and nothing could stand in God's way. This miracle was also an act of love and shows that God can give back what seemed to have been lost forever.

  1. Tim Winton in his 'quintessentially Australian' novel Cloudstreet challenges modern perceptions of spirituality with ...

    The idea of the shifty shadow goes against Winton's other dealings with spirituality, that it exists on the power of love, yet is consistent with the view that there is something beyond our existence, another realm whether it be luck or love.

  2. What problems are there in defining miracles? (7)

    Hick's argument has faults in that everyone now accepts that we need to widen natural laws as new discoveries are made. As proven in the past, what today may seam impossible may in the future be common. David Hume explains clearly his modern and comprehensive argument about miracles.

  1. 'Miracles are based on fact, not faith' - Discuss.

    I tell you the truth, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, `Move from here to there' and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you'. Because the disciples did not have faith, they could not perform the miracle.

  2. 'Miracles are a matter of faith, not fact', discuss.

    than nature and thus no power that could supersede the laws of nature). Naturalism is a philosophical assumption, and it cannot be proved by what is seen in nature itself. Following from this R.Wade argues 'to undermine the possibility of miracles, naturalists must prove there is no God to perform them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work