• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can Euthanasia be justified?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Can Euthanasia be justified? Euthanasia is the act of deliberately causing somebody to die gently and without pain, especially when they are suffering from a painful incurable disease; for the benefit of the person. Most people think unbearable pain is the main reason people seek euthanasia, but some surveys in the USA and the Netherlands showed that less than a third of requests for euthanasia were because of severe pain. There are many problems of knowledge we come across when searching for the truth: How do we know if its right or wrong? Is it morally acceptable? Should it be Legalized? * On what ground does someone make the decision for euthanasia/who makes decision, the individual, the family in some cases, gov or god etc? on what ground - logical, social (religion). - The individual should decide about its life or death if he/she can. He has the right to die in dignity and without pain because it is a human right. Ethically, who should take the decision, people with more 'power' like gov? the reason we don't know who should decide, is because everyone thinks differently (the government thinks strategically, family thinks emotionally, religious through faith etc). Different age groups will also have different viewpoints about the decision,...because they belong to another generation: the government will think in terms of money - It might want to make the decision because it will lower the cost of keeping them alive and the equipment could be used in better circumstances. ...read more.

Middle

Is it right to put the responsibility on the doctors? - There are also Culture/religion restrictions - Less than 50% of religious people said that euthanasia should be legalized. whereas 100% of non religious people said that Euthanasia should be legalized. There is a clear 'cultural clash'. DEBATE ON AGAINST AND FOR - Euthanasia could be used as an excuse to kill people - But it could be kept under control with laws - There is no way being able to control every doctor. - Yes, but the process would be supervised to ensure security, and the family would have agreed and even when it isn't legal, people still do it. - Yes, the government is putting the family under pressure. - But without this, imagine if every single person terminally ill, handicapped, or in a coma was to be looked after using machines and medicine, even though these people are going to die. That is why the government would put a maximum of years on looking after people I comas and then euthanasia can take place, because no more room , time or money would be spent on these people. - But you cant interfere with God. He says that you cannot kill other people and that only he has the right to decide when someone dies. ...read more.

Conclusion

different laws for different levels. Reason says that if we 'know' the person won't heal... once again, what are our limits of us knowing knowledge. (science/technology/miracles!)(Some people in comas have cerebral activity). * What should the consequences be if someone does illegal E - prison? culture Consequences should be - (ARTICLE where doctor had to do it.. ask class) - different people who think differently - logical thing to do in situation and logically right. In Switzerland, Euthanasia Doctor Commits Suicide after Finding Patient He Killed Was Not Terminally Ill. He was charged with being financially motivated. "Making poisonous cocktails available has deviated into pure business, and medical reports are being misused as an excuse". He killed himself... he was just doing his job, fault of woman who lied to him, but she is dead, so society needs to blame someone. From this we can ask ourselves whether punishment is justified, because some doctors might just have agreed to help a suffering patient/ Conclusion Final legalizing decisions will always depends on different cultures in different part of the word, and different religions. If there is no way that the person will ever wake up or will wake up braindead. How do we know that it is defiantly not possible, with science in the future, to cure them? Is it right or wrong?? We won't know because people don't agree on the same premiscies and never will. But euthanasia can save (end suffering of family, money, time). Reason and Emotion, when balanced out appropriately ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    From the questionnaires it seems that everybody understood the questions and answered them correctly. I believe that I didn't word any questions that influence the answers. Interview I decide to use interviews in my research to collect information as; this allows me to collect people's opinions first hand.

  2. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    He knows that he will be paralysed for the rest of his life. Ken engages in sexual banter with the nurses because he is sexually frustrated. The nurses know that this talk is safe because he cannot do anything about it.

  1. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    is of precisely the same worth as seventy years of it, just as any fraction of infinity, being indivisible, remains infinite' (Lord Jakobovits, former UK Chief Rabbi). They uphold this regardless of the pain and suffering a person might be going through, as they believe that this is not an

  2. Evaluate the ethical argument for and against keeping a person alive against his or ...

    The second distinction to make is between direct and indirect euthanasia, both of these refer to a method of inducing death.

  1. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    One is bound to respect life , but no one is obligated to prolong it in evry circumstance. He also argues that issues such as euthansia can only be handeled adequetly within the broad context of complete ethical theory. Maguire rejects the idea of a kind of fatalistic theism which

  2. I believe it is the right of any human being to be totally in ...

    The main objection that most people have agaist Euthanasia is based on religion - but what right do these people have to foister their own religous beliefs onto others? AS WITH ABORTION ITS A PERSONS RIGHT,AND THAT RIGHT SHOULDNT BE VIOLATED.

  1. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    A better translation is ' Thou shalt not murder' In our society the battle of euthanasia is being fought on three main fronts, the Christian standpoint and that of medical establishment and ethical philosophers. "Not only must it be addressed by the government, but given our times it requires the

  2. Is Euthanasia morally acceptable?

    In the original pilot (as shown in Source A) there was an 11th question that asked if they person would gave a more in depth interview at a later date but that would contradict my original thoughts to keep the questionnaire anonymous so that question was dismissed before the final copy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work