• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can Euthanasia be justified?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Can Euthanasia be justified? Euthanasia is the act of deliberately causing somebody to die gently and without pain, especially when they are suffering from a painful incurable disease; for the benefit of the person. Most people think unbearable pain is the main reason people seek euthanasia, but some surveys in the USA and the Netherlands showed that less than a third of requests for euthanasia were because of severe pain. There are many problems of knowledge we come across when searching for the truth: How do we know if its right or wrong? Is it morally acceptable? Should it be Legalized? * On what ground does someone make the decision for euthanasia/who makes decision, the individual, the family in some cases, gov or god etc? on what ground - logical, social (religion). - The individual should decide about its life or death if he/she can. He has the right to die in dignity and without pain because it is a human right. Ethically, who should take the decision, people with more 'power' like gov? the reason we don't know who should decide, is because everyone thinks differently (the government thinks strategically, family thinks emotionally, religious through faith etc). Different age groups will also have different viewpoints about the decision,...because they belong to another generation: the government will think in terms of money - It might want to make the decision because it will lower the cost of keeping them alive and the equipment could be used in better circumstances. ...read more.

Middle

Is it right to put the responsibility on the doctors? - There are also Culture/religion restrictions - Less than 50% of religious people said that euthanasia should be legalized. whereas 100% of non religious people said that Euthanasia should be legalized. There is a clear 'cultural clash'. DEBATE ON AGAINST AND FOR - Euthanasia could be used as an excuse to kill people - But it could be kept under control with laws - There is no way being able to control every doctor. - Yes, but the process would be supervised to ensure security, and the family would have agreed and even when it isn't legal, people still do it. - Yes, the government is putting the family under pressure. - But without this, imagine if every single person terminally ill, handicapped, or in a coma was to be looked after using machines and medicine, even though these people are going to die. That is why the government would put a maximum of years on looking after people I comas and then euthanasia can take place, because no more room , time or money would be spent on these people. - But you cant interfere with God. He says that you cannot kill other people and that only he has the right to decide when someone dies. ...read more.

Conclusion

different laws for different levels. Reason says that if we 'know' the person won't heal... once again, what are our limits of us knowing knowledge. (science/technology/miracles!)(Some people in comas have cerebral activity). * What should the consequences be if someone does illegal E - prison? culture Consequences should be - (ARTICLE where doctor had to do it.. ask class) - different people who think differently - logical thing to do in situation and logically right. In Switzerland, Euthanasia Doctor Commits Suicide after Finding Patient He Killed Was Not Terminally Ill. He was charged with being financially motivated. "Making poisonous cocktails available has deviated into pure business, and medical reports are being misused as an excuse". He killed himself... he was just doing his job, fault of woman who lied to him, but she is dead, so society needs to blame someone. From this we can ask ourselves whether punishment is justified, because some doctors might just have agreed to help a suffering patient/ Conclusion Final legalizing decisions will always depends on different cultures in different part of the word, and different religions. If there is no way that the person will ever wake up or will wake up braindead. How do we know that it is defiantly not possible, with science in the future, to cure them? Is it right or wrong?? We won't know because people don't agree on the same premiscies and never will. But euthanasia can save (end suffering of family, money, time). Reason and Emotion, when balanced out appropriately ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    be with a 55 year old Christian male, the third will be a 38 year old Hindu female, the fourth interview will be with a 24 year old Muslim male, and the final interview will be with a 74 year old female, with no religion.

  2. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    To open their eyes, or move a limb. Thus euthanasia is a huge moral violation according to Judaism. There is, however, a limit to the duty of keeping people alive. Jews believe that if someone is in incredible pain and terminally ill, then doctors shouldn't extend their life longer

  1. Evaluate the ethical argument for and against keeping a person alive against his or ...

    For example, there are two duties in particular, the duty of non-interference and the duty of service. The duty of non-interference states that nobody should interfere with another person's life in any way that may threaten it. It is considered that the important factors are the way the patient feels

  2. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    "That's great...Really great... I like steel bands... There's something fascinating about using oil drums-make something out of scrap... Why not try knocking a tune out of me?" "Why not?" Ken seems to genuinely mean what he says here to John showing his true interest for unusual past times.

  1. I believe it is the right of any human being to be totally in ...

    Why do people try so hard to hoist their religion onto others? The only people they hurt are the ones who need the pain least- the terminally ill. Also, I wish to point out that, no matter the number of painkilling drugs, there are still and always will be people for whom pain is an inescapable fact of life.

  2. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    (The Pope, John Paul). Having looked at the Christian perspective, I am following on to the outlook of some ethical philosophies. Looking at arguments from a different perspective, a came across an argument in support of euthanasia.

  1. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    -- Derek Humphry Advocate for voluntary euthanasia argue that this should be an option for any competent adult. Quality of life argument links in with the autonomy argument as people say that human beings should be able and have the right to live dignified lives and so the ends of their lives should be dignified too.

  2. Is Euthanasia morally acceptable?

    I chose two age groups (stratified sampling) because the adults will have well formulated opinions on the subject and the young people will have very strong feelings on the subject as young people do about topical issues. As well as this to split it into male and female so that it may show how gender affects views.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work