• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can religious and scientific ideas about creation ever be compatible?

Extracts from this document...


Can religious and scientific ideas about creation ever be compatible? Nearly all of the major world religions have a story on creation and how the world came to be. The majority of these involve God, the creator, making everything using great precision and care. However, not everybody believes that the world was made like this. Some people (usually scientists) believe that the world was created by a Big bang, and that things then evolved from the products of the bang. What I shall try to prove is whether or not religious (Christian) and scientific creation ideas can complement each other. ...read more.


Many people would say that should his theories and the scientific research be true, then the Bible cannot be correct. However, a large proportion of Christians believe that the Bible can be compatible with evolution. Liberal Christians believe that in the Bible, a day in Hebrew actually means a period of time. That can make the theory coincide with Genesis. Scientific evidence proves that the account in Genesis is actually the correct order in which all things must have been created. They believe that God only put his spirit into man when he was fully evolved. Others state that the creation story was never meant to be a scientific account. ...read more.


They claim that if the writer had known about the scientific and geological evidence that is available today that calls for the Big Bang, he would have been influenced by that, and interpreted it in some way relating to God. So the answer to the question - can religious and scientific ideas about creation ever be compatible is yes, as long as the story is taken liberally. When the Genesis account is taken literally the two ideas clash, and so there is a strong contradiction. However, if the Genesis story was not meant to be interpreted like that, the two coincide and they complement each other. Being a Christian does not mean that you cannot accept a scientific explanation. It means that you must accept God as the Creator, which can be supported by both arguments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    evolution and the religious world, there has in fact been a much better reception of the Hot Big Bang Model, so much so that the Roman Catholic Church has claimed, in 1951, that the Model is in accordance with the Bible.

  2. Individual religious experience means individual religious fantasy; corporate religious experience means corporate religious fantasy; ...

    Any perception of an individual should be publicly confirmed. No private experience can establish the existence of God. You would first need to establish the existence of God by other means on order to confirm that what was experienced was both God and True.

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    say no more about it."14 This for theists would be definite proof of religious experiences and would strengthen their beliefs, as for them it is an example of further proof of their religious beliefs which they may liken to their own experience.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The second more conservative position involves retaining the original claim about all beginnings of existence but redefining 'cause' so that it no longer means a sufficient condition but a probabilistic condition of some degree. A probabilistic theory of causality, such as Wesley Salmon's, Patrick Suppes, Richard Otte's or David Papineau's,

  1. Bereshit, the first word in Genesis translates to "in a beginning"

    man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and the man became a living being". Von Rad decides that verse 6 is an "intermediary sentence which follows the negative details and precedes the positive ones"79.

  2. I am going to be looking at how the religion of Hinduism relates to ...

    Modern science speaks of physical evolution and the evolution of the nervous system, starting with simple life forms and proceeding to more organised and complex beings with well developed features. Man is so far known as the ultimate product of the development of creatures.

  1. The Theory of Creation Vs. Evolution.

    (Genesis 1:11). .Basically Christians and other religions believe that God created something from nothing and the sheer power of God is illustrated in these previous verses. It is said in such a way that merely by his breath, life was breathed.. Science Supporting Religion There are some people who believe that God

  2. In what ways may modern ideas about evolution conflict with the biblical concept of ...

    Creation in the bible was brought about by direct acts of God as opposed to a natural, gradual process. 'In the BEGINNING God created the heaven and the earth' (Genesis 1:1). Creation took place in the beginning and was finished and complete - it was not spread out over the long period of time history of the universe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work