• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can religious and scientific ideas about creation ever be compatible?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Can religious and scientific ideas about creation ever be compatible? Nearly all of the major world religions have a story on creation and how the world came to be. The majority of these involve God, the creator, making everything using great precision and care. However, not everybody believes that the world was made like this. Some people (usually scientists) believe that the world was created by a Big bang, and that things then evolved from the products of the bang. What I shall try to prove is whether or not religious (Christian) and scientific creation ideas can complement each other. ...read more.

Middle

Many people would say that should his theories and the scientific research be true, then the Bible cannot be correct. However, a large proportion of Christians believe that the Bible can be compatible with evolution. Liberal Christians believe that in the Bible, a day in Hebrew actually means a period of time. That can make the theory coincide with Genesis. Scientific evidence proves that the account in Genesis is actually the correct order in which all things must have been created. They believe that God only put his spirit into man when he was fully evolved. Others state that the creation story was never meant to be a scientific account. ...read more.

Conclusion

They claim that if the writer had known about the scientific and geological evidence that is available today that calls for the Big Bang, he would have been influenced by that, and interpreted it in some way relating to God. So the answer to the question - can religious and scientific ideas about creation ever be compatible is yes, as long as the story is taken liberally. When the Genesis account is taken literally the two ideas clash, and so there is a strong contradiction. However, if the Genesis story was not meant to be interpreted like that, the two coincide and they complement each other. Being a Christian does not mean that you cannot accept a scientific explanation. It means that you must accept God as the Creator, which can be supported by both arguments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    of creating 'children of God'.[7] * History and faith It could be argued that much within at least the Christian faith has historical foundations. For example, a large part of the New Testament is a record of the significance of an historical figure, Jesus of Nazareth, for certain people who encountered and subsequently followed him.

  2. Bereshit, the first word in Genesis translates to "in a beginning"

    [man is] the centre of a circle"85 implying that everything else is built around him. This leads to a similar concept of man's role as in the Priestly account because in both, as van Wolde explains, "human beings are made to point to God"86 In the Yahwistic account, and only

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    There are two types of conversion; volitional (which refers to a conscious and voluntary experience) and the self-surrender, meaning an involuntary and unconscious experience. Furthermore, there are three examples of conversion experiences consisting of intellectual, moral and social ones.

  2. In society today, how can the Creation and the Evolution theory coexist?

    Religion doesn't question the idea if the Genesis, but this declaration of John Paul II shows the point of view of Church has evolved and integers the scientific advances, Personally, I think that Creationism and Darwinism are not incompatible. First of all because the Bible is a text that has

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    and strength, whilst those used least wither, eventually disappearing; however the changes made are passed from generation, so for example giraffes inherited to the slightly longer necks of their ancestors. However the more generally accepted theory, is that of Charles Darwin; when Darwin initially published his ideas he was met

  2. How are the sources of knowledge used in 'Blood Wedding', 'Love in the Time ...

    He visited every possible place where he found dead bodies. He came to them with a lot of hope, as he did not find an answer anywhere else. "...I went to the rivers where they burn Enormous painted corpses... There were whole beaches of dead And ashy specialists." (Line 36)

  1. Individual religious experience means individual religious fantasy; corporate religious experience means corporate religious fantasy; ...

    We can study the processes of transmission of religious knowledge and experience, especially in the form of spiritual relationship between master and pupil. Swinburne's principles of credulity and testimony to test the validity of a religious experience, Credulity is the 'apparent perceptions ought to be taken at face value in the absence of positive reason for challenge.'

  2. To what extent the Hare Krishna movement can be described as a cult

    The authoritative difference between the cults and Christianity forms a wide chasm. They supplant the biblical structure of the church with isolated unaccountable leadership. They reduce the effectiveness of the written Word of God through new translations and redefining terms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work