• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can Sympathy Provide A Satisfactory Basis For Morality?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Can Sympathy Provide A Satisfactory Basis For Morality? Western philosophy has provided many attempts to unravel the complex problem of human morality and to provide answers to questions such as 'how can I be moral?' and more generally to questions such as 'What is morality?'. One prominent line of thought, which can be traced back to the writings of Cicero places sympathy or a kind of fellow feeling as the basis for morality. It is this particular idea, whether or not sympathy can provide a sound basis for morality, that I am going to explore over the course of this study with particular reference to the writings of the Scottish empiricist philosopher David Hume (1711-1776) in two of his principle works A Treatise of Human Nature (1739) and An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751). For Hume, sympathy is an essential feature of the way humans communicate and in particular communication of feelings from one individual to another, such that if one person sees a misfortune befall another they will, in some sense, share in the pain of that misfortune. Hume's moral philosophy is unusual in that it seems to present us with less of a moral philosophy than a socio-psychological account of why humans in general act in the moral way that they do. ...read more.

Middle

pain and as such excite the passions to motivate us towards those that produce pleasure and away from those to the contrary. Reason cannot by itself yield any moral judgements but has an important subsidiary role to play. Piers Benn in his Ethics offers a nice example to illustrate this instrumental role. Reason might inform me that a remark I am about to make to someone will cause offence, but this knowledge will only deter me from making this remark if I do not wish to cause offence. If motivation of making the remark was to cause offence then I will still go ahead. The operation of reason has no effect on my original intentions. Hence Hume concluded reason to be totally inert and therefore plays no role in actively making moral judgements. One small problem, noted by Reid, arising from this, is that it is not clear what meaning of 'reason' he is claiming that moral distinctions do not arise. Though in the context of this study it will be enough simply to draw attention to this issue and we may continue without further investigation of this point. Since Hume wants to hold that moral distinctions between vice and virtue are not derived from reason he must show what he believes the true basis of virtue to be. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hume does not mean by 'sympathy' either compassion or pity as it often does in modern use. Rather he uses the term to mean a tendancy to share what one takes to be the feelings of another, of whatever kind they are. Sympathy is not another word for benevolance or altruism. However, sympathy can and normally does produce benevolance. Hume in his Treatise... seperates virtues into natural and artificial. Firstly artificial virtues such as justice and fidelity are not embedded in human nature. They have developed over time as a necessary feature of human interaction. It is only through artificial virtues such as justice that has enabled society as it exists today possible. ..... Those natural virtues, on the other hand, such as charity, beneficiance, generosity, moderation etc... are embedded as fundamental features of human nature. It is through sympathy that we may experience pleasure in observing others who benefit from natural virtues. Hume thought that an analogy could be drawn between sympathy as a means by which humans communicated feelings, and the strings of the same length of a musical instrument that that resonate amoung themselves. When others receive pleasure, we ourselves resonate with that pleasure. We receive no direct benefit from the action but our sympathetic link to it causes us to approve it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    A decision could not be made on the basis of religion, and therefore would need to be made on the basis of reason alone. Some people favour heteronomy because it is inevitable that society is influenced by religious views. It could also be said that for such a long time,

  2. Aristotle - Virtue Ethics Essay

    The mother could become more virtuous by keeping the child because it would test her character and would make her have to think always someone else as well as her self, yet by aborting the foetus, the mother could focus her efforts fully on become more virtuous.

  1. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    It was called Christian reconstruction in Europe. The name was soon changed when the world council of churches was founded in 1948 and the work became part of the British council of churches. It became know as The Department of Inter-Church Aid and Refugee Service.

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    However, if thought through, Singer's ideal still encounters problems; one only has to think about the consequences of his ideal to see how meaningless it would become. If Singer's argument was consistently applied, and we gave away everything apart from that which we needed for 'basic necessities' no one would

  1. Euthanasia can never be justified

    cured are not able to get quick access to the facilities they need for treatment. Instead these health resources are being used on people who cannot be cured, and who, for their own reasons, would prefer not to continue living.

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    "Ought implies can." We cannot expect people to do things that they cannot do. If a child is drowning, and John cannot swim, then john is not physically capable of saving the child, and there is therefore no sense in our saying that he ought to save the child.

  1. Explain the significance of Plato's analogy of the cave. Is it of relevance to ...

    However, this is all disrupted when one prisoner is unchained and forced to stand up and turn around. He would find himself in quite a lot of pain and would want to turn back towards the wall and the friendly shadows.

  2. Explain how Macintyre's or Aristotle's account of a life lived in accordance with virtues ...

    He says that when our soul succeeds in controlling our desires, we engage our moral virtues. When our soul concentrates on intellectual matters, we engage our intellectual virtues. He tells us, every action and feeling must be done in the right amount.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work