• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can the Existence of God be proven?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Can the Existence of God be proven? There are many arguments that try to prove the existence of God. In this essay I will look at the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, empirical arguments such as the avoidance of error and the argument from design. There are many criticisms of each of these that would say the existence of God can't be proven that are perhaps stronger than those saying it can be. The definition of God for which is being argued is the Christian God who has the qualities of being perfect and who created the universe. The ontological argument follows that God id perfect and no greater being is imaginable. If God did not exist, he would not be the greatest being imaginable. He is the greatest thing imaginable. Therefore he does exist. From this argument, God's existence is viewed as necessary (Ayer. A.J. 1973). His existence is seen as simply another property of his being. Just like omnipotence and omnipresent are properties. One example that has been used to explain this is a triangle. A triangle has certain properties such as all of the angles add up to 180o and even if we have never thought about it before we clearly recognise these properties 'whether we want to or not' (Cottingham. J. 1986). A triangle's real meaning is independent of our mind just as God's existence is. ...read more.

Middle

Heat can only be produced by heat that is at least as hot as the heat produced. Descartes also argued that details of an idea even if just a representation such as a drawing of the Eiffel tower must be contained in its cause, whatever cause it turns out to be (Principle 1, 17. AT V11 11; CSM 1198, as cited in Cottingham. J. 1986). So therefore in a drawing of the Eiffel tower, the idea represents it being tall. The tallness really belongs to the Eiffel tower but is represented in the drawing. The argument concludes that the cause of our idea of God must have come from God himself because he is the only thing which posses the qualities of our idea of God. Therefore God exists (Cottingham. J. 1986). One criticism of this was argued by Gassendi. The argument argues that 'x' is caused by an efficient cause. Whereas Gassendi argues that it appears more to be explained by material causes. For example, the materials that are used to build a bridge must hold the same strength as the bridge itself which is obviously implausible (Cottingham. J. 1986). Another example is of a sponge cake. The main property of a sponge cake is sponginess. But none of the ingredients used to make the sponge cake contain such properties. Descartes may argue back at this saying that the ingredients or 'materials' have the potential once combined to create sponginess or strength. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whereas, if we 'bet' against his existence and he does exist then we would not receive this eternal happiness. But this argument seems to stand on very poor grounds. For one, you can not make yourself believe in something. And even if you did, it would be a forced belief that surely wouldn't constitute for eternal happiness. Secondly, one of God's properties is his ability to forgive. Therefore he should forgive those who don't believe, so betting on his existence purely out of fear would be forgiven so there is no need to 'force' yourself to believe. This argument is far from proving the existence of God, it argues more for the purpose of believing in him rather than whether he actually exists. In conclusion, all the arguments bar one that have been covered have been strongly criticised questioning their validity. Thomas Hobbes argued that we have no true idea of God and that we should not and cannot try to prove his existence because of this (AR V11 180; CSM 11 127, as cited in J. Cottingham, 1986). Belief is a question of faith. For those who believe in God do not feel it necessary to prove his existence as their faith is enough for them. To a person who's belief is so certain and so strong, God's existence cannot be denied even without proof. But on the other hand, God's existence can not be proved in terms of objective arguments and scientific facts. In answer to the question, God's existence cannot be proved, but neither can his non existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    it is impossible for people to know what God created or God himself. The big bang provides a scientific explanation about the beginning of the universe. Scientific explanation has observed that there was a beginning to the universe and it developed an early structure very early in its development.

  2. The Existence of God

    He was British Christian apologist, philosopher and utilitarian. Paley believed that there had to be a creator (God) in this world because it is so complex. Paley once saw a pocket watch lying on the ground in nature and he stated that the watch is so complex that there had to be a person who designed it.

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    Again, this challenges the design argument to a huge extent, as it poses a question to followers of the teleological which they cannot possibly answer. His final main point is purely explaining that the world cannot be compared to anything else of a similar form, so to say that it

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    ourselves such as the words 'intelligent', 'powerful' and 'forgiving' which are all words that are used to describe both people and God. Hume also names the contents of our minds perceptions and further divides them into two types: impressions and ideas.

  1. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    if God is nothing God cannot be an explanation for the universe. Aquinas wants to deny this distinction. Aquinas maintains that God is neither something nor nothing - God is in God's own category. Brian Davies makes the same point, and it is central to the cosmological argument.

  2. Consider Crittically the Arguments against the DesignArgument Deomonstrating the Existence of God and assess ...

    One specific area can't be projected to another part, or the whole of nature. A baker is nothing like the bread he makes, can we therefore infer God is nothing like the universe He created? If so it gives us no indication into what God is like.

  1. Does God Exist?

    can be thought of would not be something than which nothing greater can be thought of, which is an outright contradiction and thus absurd. Something than which nothing greater can be thought of has such a high degree of existence, that is, necessary existence, that it cannot be thought of as not existing, that is, its nonexistence is impossible.

  2. Consider the problems involved in trying to prove and disprove the existence of God.

    However, this proof is unconvincing in that no impericle evidence is presented and it is also debatable than God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived. The A posteriori cosmological argument for the existence of God depends on the ontological argument in that it is first necessary to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work