• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

Extracts from this document...


Can we know something that has not yet been proven true? In order to answer this question, we must first define how we can prove that something is true and it actually exists. Some think that 'seeing is believing' and therefore if they see something with their own eyes, that precise object must exist. Others feel that if there is not a logical explanation to a certain event or to a belief, then that thing does not exist. Some might say that scientific proof is the only way to state that a certain thing is true. What happens when scientific proof is showed to someone who only believes in the 'seeing is believing' principle, or what if a plain and simple picture is shown to a scientist? Will they believe that that object or theses exist or not? For us to know something, we must believe that the method used to prove this fact, is the most suitable and the most accurate. For example, not many people will believe that UFOs exist just because they have been showed a picture with a presumed flying spacecraft on it. This also goes for everything we are taught in life. ...read more.


Religion is probably the most complicated and sensible subject dealing with what is real and what is not. How can so many people in the world follow a religion, which does not have some clear and recent proof? We do have eyewitness accounts, and holy books, but how can we explain all the miracles and the extraordinary events that characterise the life of a prophet. I am not here to criticise mine or other religious beliefs, but I am here to define the difference between knowledge and faith. Faith is another form of knowing something that has not yet been proven true, but it consists of something beyond science and beyond any sort of facts and figures. We can say that faith is a derivative of the 'seeing is believing' principle. The only difference between the two is that, the religious belief is based on eyewitness accounts from over a millennium ago and not from your own observation. Faith could be interpreted as another method of knowing something that has not yet been proven true, if we do not consider how much time has passed since someone had the capabilities to prove that our beliefs and everyone else's, are true. ...read more.


This knowledge could be useless as it could be the key to our survival. It is obvious that in order to know something, one must first make sure it is true, and to do that, one must follow the best possible method, he or she regards as the most reliable. This is the very foundation of our knowledge. The proof of something being true, plays a vital role in the knowing or not knowing concept. What really matters is that, one must be able to prove to himself that his knowledge is correct, and in order to do so, one must follow the method chosen. There are more than one points of view concerning method used, and there will be some people who will think that the method u chose is the wrong one and rather inaccurate. But from your point of view, you would know that a certain thing is true, and according to your method, you have proven it true. But for those who do not believe the method you chose is the best one, they will bring up the argument that you have did not prove that that thing exists, even though they might believe it does. Therefore you would know something that has not yet been proven true. 1 http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/truth/ January 6th 2004. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Jung's methodology has been criticised because he has pointed out that his rejection of the possibility of ever knowing whether God exists rests upon the assumption that nothing can be known of the physic world outside. The question of Gods existence is therefore unanswerable, since this would involve searching beyond the physic world into the world of reality.

  2. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    It doesn't follow that existence is actual in the real world (At VII99; CSM 1172, as cited in Cottingham. J. 1986). Another example used to try and support the existence of God can be proven is Super Pegasus. A horse has the property of existence.

  1. "By discovering something new, a character can change for the better." Is this ...

    is a ballad of ancient times, reprinted with explanatory notes for a new audience. As proof that discovering something new doesn't always change one's circumstances for the better, but often it is quite the contrary, this antiquated structure emphasizes the dire circumstances of the Mariner's punishment; signifying the extensive amount

  2. Explain the difference between knowing something and believing something

    Belief can be very convincing, so convincing that we think we actually know it. For example "I know that all crows are black" how do we know this? There might be a very rare species of white crow. We are only assuming, yet we are stating that we know.

  1. To what extent the Hare Krishna movement can be described as a cult

    God's message is clear-stay away from false prophets. No prophet of the Bible ever predicted an event that failed in one degree. This is not true of the prophets and leaders of the cults. None have ever had complete accuracy.

  2. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence

    A rationalist would say that experience is not our only source of knowledge. People often us logic as evidence to prove that something is the truth. But it does take previous knowledge to acquire knowledge from logic. For example, you can know that "all black cats are black", this is

  1. Why is there something rather than nothing?

    guide in the investigation or solution of a problem and it is this notion of 'doing' that we should try to communicate to everyone everywhere. 4. Is the notion of a disembodied mind coherent? I assuming disembodied to mean having been divested of any material existence or substance.

  2. " Previous generations thought they knew what was true and what was right. We ...

    Wrede was among the first to suggest that these stories and sayings of Jesus circulated independently and Mark had woven them together to form his gospel. The independence of these stories and sayings gave rise to scholars referring to them as units, or units of tradition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work