• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?'

Extracts from this document...


Theory Of Knowledge February 2004 Essay: 'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?' By: Solange Di Rocca Gr. 12 Before analysing this title we must understand what it is to know what is meant by the term 'to prove true'. A proof is something we take to be true, something that justifies our beliefs; it is not the same as to reach 100% certainty, but to reach such a level that allows us to draw the conclusion that an argument is true. And knowledge is the established understanding of the connections between the data we perceive from the world around us, for example to gain mathematical knowledge; we understand the connections made between the question and the result. However, do we always need proof to know something? Some would say that they know God exists because they have proof; they take the bible or miracles etc. to be true, and therefore consider these enough proofs for their argument. By the same token, we need some kind of proof in order to establish these connections, and therefore to achieve knowledge. ...read more.


They had restricted knowledge and drew the sensible conclusion; if the earth were not flat we would all be falling off at the sides of it. Similarly, people believed that the earth was the centre of the universe and that the sun revolved around the earth because they had proof to back up their belief. After all they had no knowledge of other planets or other constellations, they saw the sun and the moon rise and set, and drew to the conclusion that they rotated around the earth and therefore the earth was at the centre of the universe. This knowledge was also enclosed in many books, and few dared to question this knowledge, that many simply accepted because it made sense. However Christopher Columbus and Galileo Galilei proved them wrong, these men dared to question, and discovered new knowledge. They had new beliefs that was then justified by some kind of proof and led to new knowledge. Christopher Columbus had this belief that the earth was not flat but in fact round. ...read more.


proving that we can indeed only know what has been proven true; but because of the very nature of proof, truth must be something mutable and not fixated and rigid. But in order for us to make these connections, we must have proof. Although this proof can sometimes be based on assumptions, which can be true or false, they can also be based on facts. For example the proof that the earth was flat was based on false assumptions, whilst scientific proof is based on scientific facts. But even the knowledge back then, although based on false proof, was dependant on these proofs in order to be knowledge. Proof is needed in the validation of a belief or argument, and validation is necessary to knowledge. If we do not believe an argument we would not know it. For example, we may not believe in the existence of the devil, but only with the necessary proof, either empirical or rational, could we say that we knew the devil did or did not exist. Proof is what makes the difference between belief and knowledge and it is a crucial part of our quest to knowledge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Is Galileo considered a "hero" or "anti-hero"?

    Jesus is waging in Germany and Spain" p.66 where he blames the church on spending money on wars and not on the well being of the peasant and therefore showing no respect and fairness for these poor and unfortunate people.

  2. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    1973). God posses the property of existence. The ontological argument argues that God's existence is necessary and an inseparable quality of the perfect being just like 180o is inseparable from a triangle. But another more logical way of looking at this is that the concept of existence is inseparable from the concept of the Supreme Being.

  1. If facts by themselves never prove or disprove anything, what else is involved in ...

    This was a fact. But this fact on its own was not enough to prove the statement true. Sometimes we can come to false truths. Why is this? For something to be true, it has to correspond to reality. So once the mind accepts that a fact certainly corresponds with reality then, only then, is a statement true.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    To Kant, it seemed impossible that we could require an aim for an impossible goal. This deadlock led Kant to postulate the existence of God and immorality. As we are unable to achieve the goal in this lifetime there must be someone else to ensure that we can in a future life.

  1. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    These conclusions state what is true and what is not. We can also take into consideration, the fact that some people believe that 'seeing is believing'. In general we can relate this also to our other four senses (hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching), therefore resulting in a method that uses

  2. As a recovering addict, I can understand Lao Tse's instructions regarding desire. He ...

    Our desire to name the Tao, which may spring from our inherent fear of the unknown, keeps us from understanding it at all, and the point of our very existence is to understand the Tao. The Tao, the nameless Way of understanding, transcends naming, as it is the source of

  1. My Beliefs - People often describe beliefs as assumptions or convictions you hold as ...

    Something that is always ready to be used. When there is no time to consult a friend, teacher, or book, the "golden rule" can be our guide for proper conduct. Treat others as you would be treated, and you will treat them right.

  2. To what extent the Hare Krishna movement can be described as a cult

    The more dramatic the claims of a cult leader, the more possibility of a tragic conclusion. The cult leaders isolate their authority from historic Christianity. They set their stage with an open frontal attack of historic Christianity. Their argument is that the church has departed from true faith, and that they alone provide God's true direction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work