• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Capital Punishment Capital punishment is a government's response to what society considers the maximum crime. The crimes that are usually deemed the worst are usually limited to intentional murder or treason. However, not all governments consider capital punishment appropriate, and a number of countries do not provide for it. Capital punishment is a nice way of saying execution or retaliatory murder. Simply put, a person who is sentenced for a capital offense faces execution. While the method differs according to what state you live in, the result is nevertheless the same. The larger question concerns the morality of government-sponsored killing. An examination of the issue reveals valid arguments on both sides of the debate. The issue has faced man since society began to develop. It is very likely that the debate will endure long beyond our lives. Those that support capital punishment use a variety of arguments. Some of these begin with the very traditional-the Bible. "An eye for an eye" is often used as an appropriate argument. "The punishment should fit the crime" is another one. ...read more.

Middle

When they leave prison will they be able to function in society in a law-abiding way or not? In capital cases, where the prisoner would not be released, it almost doesn't matter what happens to the criminal. The U.S. Constitution prohibits 'cruel and unusual punishment". Is not an execution "cruel and unusual punishment"? The Supreme Court says that it is not, and for years has allowed for executions. Texas and Florida are two leading states in the area of executions. Yet the result of those states' activities is meager. If advocates of capital punishment believe that it is a deterrent, why is it that the murder rate in these states continue to climb, while in states where there is no capital punishment (Vermont, Massachusetts) the murder rate has actually decreased. Aside from the deterrent debate, there is the moral one. As stated above, does a civilized society have the right to take a life? How can a culture that preaches forgiveness and the value of life, argue in favor of executions? Isn't it interesting that those who generally oppose abortion (basing their argument on the sanctity of life) ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet those who argue for it have not all lost a loved one to murder. Even in the case of Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma bomber, a number of relatives of the victims oppose his death. Yet McVeigh himself has dropped his appeals and has asked to be executed as quickly as possible. I find that the entire issue of deterrence is flawed. Murder, by definition, is an irrational act. An irrational person who does not stop and think of the consequences of his action certainly does not stop and think of the possible punishment. In addition, the lack of statistical evidence merely adds to my feelings. With murders continuing to rise in states with plenty of executions, how can one argue that it is acting as a deterrent? As long as we claim that we live in a civilized society, the government must set the standard of our civility. Permitting executions is wrong on its face. We do not prevent murder and we do not promote morality; we merely give in to our weaknesses and uncivilized past. Capital punishment may have been acceptable years ago, but it no longer can be considered civilized. It leaves us no better than the criminal, only with a moralistic excuse for revenge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. The Punishment must fit the crime

    However many other Muslims believe punishment is there for protection. As a Muslim they believe it is there duty to Allah to protect the weak and those with disabilities from those who have committed crime. Also the Qur'an teaches that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law and

  2. Capital Punishment

    Because punishment is a means of producing suffering, and suffering is bad, punishment can only be justified on utilitarian grounds if: a) the amount of suffering is outweighed by benefits to society; and b) that good cannot be produced in any other way which is more economical or does not involve suffering.

  1. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    their belief in the myths about the underworld, maybe what they fear is that "they will be- nowhere"19, and end up in limbo. Lucretius and Epicurus see it as silly to worry about something that cannot trouble us when it arrives and instead makes our lives miserable that are consumed of troubling thoughts that do not affect us later.

  2. Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868

    It was the bringing of all these rough types together at public executions, where the crowd was seen as one, voicing its opinion loudly, that created the problem. A select committee in 1856 called for the removal of public punishment from societies view19 but nothing was done to that effect for another twelve years.

  1. Capital Punishment Workshop.

    Our group consisted of five characters that created a stereotypical bully and his group of friends picking on a boy for his lunch money, but when the boy fails to hand them the money the bully shouts let him have it, we then stop in a freeze frame to capture the moment.

  2. Capital Punishment debate

    Virtually all of those on death row suffer from some form of psychological damage, which puts them at a disadvantage in the legal system. It has also been suggested that the reason for the vast numbers of poorer people convicted of murder is simply that incompetent lawyers are hired to

  1. Capital Punishment, is it an effective or ineffective deterrent?

    Does the death penalty deter? only where execution is an absolute certainty. It was noted that in Britain, between abolition of the death penalty in 1965 and 1998, the murder rate more than doubled to around 750 per annum. 71 murders were committed by people who had been released after serving "life sentences" in the same period,31.

  2. Analyse the philosophical principles of at least one ethical theory and evaluate its application ...

    It might be possible to bend the rule and equate jail time with the crime as just punishment. In that case, assault and battery could be punished. In either case, the punishment, while arguably just, does nothing to recompense the victim, and nothing to prevent the criminal from doing further crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work