• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868

Extracts from this document...


Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868 We, as a society, have a long history of death as the ultimate punishment. In Britain it was in use as an answer to murder right up until 1965. Over time it transgressed, from being simple retribution for a crime against ones person and/or property, to being both this and a deterrent to others considering the same. Thus the spectacle of death was created, not so much as a form of punishment for the individual, but more as a show of what would happen if others chose to follow him. In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries England had over 200 capital offences, collectively known as the 'Bloody Code', although the sheer number is, in itself, misleading. The offences were very particular and due to this and the fact that in over 90 per cent of cases pardons were given1, they were gradually eroded. The Offences Against the Person Act in 1861 finally removed the death penalty for all crimes except murder and treason. Public executions were big events in London with attendance rivalling many well known political meetings of the time2. According to Emsley these levels would have been increased, in part, because of the growth of the press in the period3. ...read more.


This conclusion seems a little to obvious and easy to draw, rather like us today claiming that violent films equal violent people. To simplify the issue like this was to remove autonomy from the masses. This, unfortunately, is exactly what did happen however. Those who liked to see themselves as upstanding and civilised members of society began to question the motives and intentions of those who chose to attend executions. It became something which respectable people simply did not do and as such labelled those who went as rough, uncouth, villainous types, people to be feared and avoided. This is where the second argument for abolition stemmed from although the initial intention was for the complete removal of capital punishment, public or not. The abolitionists calling for an end to the death penalty took the 'disorder and immorality of the crowd'13to be the focal point in their argument because it would have been difficult to argue that it was not an effective remedy against re-offending. This was a mistake however; it was this constant complaining about the conduct of the masses that drew the legislative eye away from the death penalty as punishment in itself and allowed it to focus on the conclusion that the crowd should be removed to make it more effective14. ...read more.


1 'The Hanging Tree', V.A.C. Gatrell, Oxford Press, p. 21 2 ibid p.56 3 'Crime and Society in England 1750-1900', Clive Emsley, Longman Press, p.260 4 ibid p. 265 footnote 20 William Makepeace Thackeray 'Going to See a Man Hanged' Frasers Magazine 22 (1840) 5 opcit, Gatrell, p.31-32 6 opcit, Emsley p.259 7 'The Common Hangman' James Bland at www.hangman.info/hangman1.htm 8 opcit, Emsley, p.260 9 'Civilising Punishment: The End of Public Execution In England', Randall McGowan, Journal of British Studies, vol. 33, issue 3 July 1997 accessed via JSTOR p.274 10 ibid, p259, Henry Fielding 'Complete Works', p.122-26. 11 'Dickens and Crime', 1964, p.225-227 found in 'The Hanging Tree', V.A.C. Gatrell. 12 Opcit, McGowan, p.264 13 Opcit, McGowan, p.266 14 ibid, McGowan, p. 266 15 opcit, re Thackeray 'Going to Se a Man Hanged' 16 This is getting back into the 'violence breeds violence' debate referred to earlier in the essay, one which was a popular criticism of public executions at the time. 17 'Observations on the Present State of the Parochial and Vagrant Poor', John Scott, p97-99, found in McGowan p.260-261 18 'Speech in Favour of Capital Punishment' J.S. Mill, via link www.cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/mill.htm 19 opcit, Emsley, p.278 20 opcit McGowan p.274 21 Public Records Office at www.pro.gov.uk/inthenews/capital-pun/capi-1.htm 22 opcit, Gatrell, p.589 citing Radzinowicz 23 opcit, Gatrell, p.57 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Written Speech: Capital Punishment - MOTION:

    It is no surprise that these children grow up to become violent and savage-like. Their minds are fed with evilness from these executions and sooner or later they end up thinking that there is nothing wrong with violence and that there is nothing wrong with brutally murdering each other for crimes, which should not be punished by death.

  2. Should capital punishment be brought back in the U.K.

    should think about the killer's family and how they will have to live without their son, daughter etc. But I think that the killer should have thought about that and he/she should have thought about how the victim's family will feel before he/she does the crime, it is the killers

  1. Capital punishment as a deterrent of capital crimes in America

    If the other, nonracial factors were ignored, the difference was 11 to 1" (Kronenwetter 38). Another issue that is encompassed by the debate over practicality is that of the possibility of making mistakes. When an innocent person is executed, how can that be justified?

  2. Capital Punishment

    Also, act utilitarianism can have some quite extreme results. Rule utilitarianism focuses on general rules that everyone should follow to bring about the greatest good for that community. Rule utilitarianism establishes the best overall rule by determining the course of action which, when pursued by the whole community leads to the best result.

  1. An Essay on Crime, what Capital Punishment is, my own view and also the ...

    But in some countries it is still in use. Some people believe that it should be brought back to deter and to take revenge on the criminals. The theory of deterrence for capital punishment in some people's eyes should be brought back as it would deter the criminals and others from committing a crime.

  2. Analysing a documentary called "14 Days in May".

    The director specifically has included this statistics in the documentary, so he can get the audience to look on one side of the wall, because he wants the audience to feel sympathy towards EEJ and doesn't really tell about the crimes EEJ had been accused of and to build on

  1. '14 Days in May' - A Biased Report.

    This made me feel that all these men were innocent, although many might not be, but still the way in which I saw them made me wonder if capital punishment was such a good idea. This documentary was structured so that the viewers got to see the last 14 day

  2. Capital punishment, is the execution of criminals by the state, for committing crimes, regarded ...

    The first condition is that it must be first degree murder, which is the deliberate and premeditated taking of life. The second is that one or more aggravating circumstances must be present. Aggravating Circumstances refer to those aspects of a crime that increase its severity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work