• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment: An injustice or a necessity?

Extracts from this document...


Capital Punishment: An injustice or a necessity? The most severe of all sentences, also known as the death penalty, capital punishment involves the state in deciding whether a criminal should or should not die for their crimes is requires law to kill the criminal. Capital Punishment is a very controversial issue in today's society, with opinion being very much divided for or against the issue and I will study to find out which is the more responsible and better for our society. Most people believe that Man deserves the highest respect. This is not however considered crucial for the one who hurts his fellow man only for the victims of crimes and their family. Sympathy and unity with the victim causes many people to believe that the death penalty is the only appropriate punishment for murder. They believe it will give the victim's family closure; it will satisfy their need to avenge their loved one. If however the state murders a murderer, the state is every bit as wrong in my view. It is only adding to the cycle of violence. As the belief for respect of man states, it would also come forth that these criminals have a right to life, a natural human right and capital punishment is a direct violation to that right, which is internationally agreed upon in the UN. ...read more.


"Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made man." (The Bible) Whether one believes that the words come from a god or not, these words show an ancient sense of justice, which in turn testifies to a view of the high importance of man that has existed far back in the history of humanity. There is something within people that automatically says that man has such significance, dignity and importance that someone who murders anther does not deserve to live. This natural instinct to protect life is something we need to confirm and value, but is putting another person to death the best way to underpin it? The bible also says "Thou shalt not kill" which states that no person on earth has a right to take a life, with no exceptions, and that is wrong to play god by choosing who lives and dies. There is no greater crime on earth than to take a fellow man's life. A person's life cannot be violated in a more brutal way. Human worth cannot be more despised in any more severe way. A murderer gives his victim a horrible punishment, which is to deny that person their whole life ahead of them. ...read more.


Also, a wrong number of non-whites have been executed. In the 20th century, when the death penalty was used for rape, no white men were executed for raping non-white women whereas most black offenders who raped white women were executed. This gives us the impression that the race of the person to be executed can affect the likelihood that they will receive a death sentence and as a result of this there are a large number of ethnic minorities on death row, supporters of the death penalty would say that the death row verdicts on people about interracial murders are not racially motivated but are due to that most cases have murders committed during another form of criminal activity whereas same race murders are normally personal motives for revenge and that juries are more likely to convict someone who killed out of cold blood than someone who killed for a personal motive. After going through all the points I think most would agree that the purpose of capital punishment is to discourage dreadful crimes and to remove individuals who commit these crimes from society forever. While capital punishment may remove some of these individuals, it does not remove all, and some of the individuals it removes from society have not committed terrible crimes. And it has been proven, legal killings are not successful in preventing illegal killings and make that society just as bad as the murderer. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Death Penalty Opinion.

    He is imprisoned again only to be released. This could happen since almost one in ten death row inmates has been convicted of murder at least once. That means that some death row inmates have been given more than one chance to rehabiliate in prison and continue to commit violent crimes.

  2. Capital Punishment

    Also, it must be remembered that animals are real people too, who have a life and with it the capacity to feel pain, fear and the loss of their loved ones and all the other emotions that the rest of us are capable of feeling.

  1. Capital punishment as a deterrent of capital crimes in America

    Or, for that matter, why are there no laws stating that a man must have children by his brother's widow (Deut 25:5)? The reason that these taboos and requirements of The Old Testament are rejected by American society today is because it has chosen to decide for itself what its laws will be.

  2. Capital Punishment Crime is a social act that offends the laws of society. This ...

    People against the cause say why don't they just be put in jail? The argument for is heavily weighted because they can say that after they have served their prison sentence they will be let out again and therefore be a threat to society again and re-commit more crimes.

  1. In this philosophical study of applied ethics the concept of punishment will be argued ...

    In contrast to retributive punishment is deterrence. Deterrence has a forward-looking view of punishment because it views punishment essentially as a means of enabling society to function fully in the future. The retributive aim does not rule this out as an aim of punishment, but deterrence differs because it doesn't punish the offence for its on sake.

  2. Capital Punishment: Justice for All?

    to acknowledge that they were warned, but went ahead and committed the crime regardless. Furthermore, an individual was not allowed to testify against themselves. As a result, the death penalty was effectively legislated out of existence in the Jewish law.

  1. Capital Punishment, is it an effective or ineffective deterrent?

    Through this group Beccaria became acquainted with French and British political philosophers, such as Hobbes13, Hume14, Diderot15, Helvetius16 and Montesquieu17. At the encouragement of Pietro, Beccaria wrote "On Crimes and Punishments" (1764). Some background information was provided by Pietro, who was in the process of authoring a text on the

  2. An Essay on Crime, what Capital Punishment is, my own view and also the ...

    Another argument for the bringing back of capital punishment is that it has been in existence since the beginning of time- so why stop doing it now? It can be traced back to thousands of years before Jesus' time and proved to be useful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work