• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment debate

Extracts from this document...


Should Capital Punishment be restored in the U.K.? Capital Punishment is the lawful infliction of death by the state as punishment for a wide variety of offences. The topic of Capital Punishment is an emotive one. Not only does it have the ability to provoke and divide public opinion, it also, most essentially, is an issue of life and death. Very few people do not have an opinion on it; you are either for it or against it. Through this piece, I will look at both sides of the argument, in order to evaluate if Capital Punishment is indeed something that should be consigned to history books, or if it's needed now more than ever. The movement towards the abolition of the death penalty appears to be a global one. By the end of 2005, from the one hundred and eighty nine nations in the U.N., one hundred and eight had abolished capital punishment compared to eighty one which still continue with the idea that, by taking revenge, and killing their criminals, society will be a better place for all. Seven of these countries and some states in the U.S., despite a ban, use capital punishment on juveniles and inmates with special educational needs, further showing that even ...read more.


Although it may be argued that the death penalty is a successful deterrent for would- be criminals, there is no proof that it is, even though this assumption seems intuitively correct. I would agree that, capital punishment is the only way that we know that a person can never commit crime again. It is a cause for public concern that sometimes, despite getting life sentences, people can escape with some as little as fifteen years in jail. A suitable solution to this would be tougher jail sentences and a life sentence which really means life. Only then can people feel safe and believe that criminals have been properly punished. The argument about the value of human life can be used by both sides of the debate. People who are in favour of the death penalty feel that, the victim's life has been taken from them and so exacting the highest punishment, that is their death, is the only way that we can acknowledge the high value of human life. On the other hand, those who support the abolition of capital punishment believe that even though the convicted person has murdered, and taken away someone's life, all life is sacred, and that taking away another person's life, even by the state, is wrong. ...read more.


Arguing that the cost of a criminal's permanent incarceration is too high is in my opinion, cheapening human life. It is like slapping a price tag on human life. The death penalty denies a basic human right, the right to life. Admittedly, criminals need to be punished, but to kill them achieves nothing except another death and killing them won't bring back the victim to life. It is understandable that supporters of capital punishment feel that it's safer when a convicted person is killed, that way, they can never attack again. However, the same result is achieved, if they were given a life sentence and restrictions were put in place to make sure that can not get out early. Although the criminal deservedly, should not get any special treatment, the inevitable media circus that follows trials where the person is going to be put to death is unfair to anyone, even a murderer. It also puts a lot of strain on the family of the person, and they are completely innocent. The desire to restore the death penalty is at its strongest when a diabolical and disgusting murder has just taken place, but capital punishment should never be restored in the U.K. Intellect must rule emotion, society should never have blood on its hands. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Should Capital Punishment be completely abolished?

    This shows that not only is the state killing, but making a doctor an accessory to the murder. One of the most important reasons why the death penalty should be completely abolished is because no matter how hard we try, we will always kill innocent people.

  2. Capital Punishment Vs Right to Life

    The woman who is being sentenced to death to death by her illness is being equally sentenced as the criminal being sentenced to capital punishment by human justice. To me this seems unfair, because if we commit wrong actions in our lives, then ought to pay them while we are alive, so that we can learn and reflect upon them.

  1. Capital Punishment

    This still doesn't take away the fact that it is still murder. The murder should be punished but not quiet as severely as death. A lot of people believe that capital punishment would be the easy way out and they would be escaping a real punishment.

  2. Capital punishment was the worst punishment that ever faced this country

    What a good idea this death penalty is turning out to be: it kills the wrong people, and forces innocent family members to kill as well! And look at the young people, like you or me, or your brothers or sisters, that are killed unnecessarily.

  1. The Debate over the merits of capital punishment has enduredfor years, and continues to ...

    Deterrence to crime, is rooted in the individuals themselves. Every human has a personal set of conduct. How much they will and will not tolerate. How far they will and will not go. This personal set of conduct can be made or be broken by friends, influences, family, home, life, etc.

  2. Were Morant and Handcock murderers or 'scapegoats of the empire'?

    Despite demonstrating loyalty, consumed with revenge they ignored morals or fair justice by denying any judicial proceedings to the prisoners. Execution without the opportunity to appeal was a cruel punishment. An implication does arise from the confession that Morant and Handcock acted in revenge rather than following orders, attained from their guilt.

  1. Capital Punishment

    Reform- reformative punishment is forward looking and shares many of the characteristics of deterrence. Where it differs is in its consideration of the status of the offender. It sees punishment as both the means and opportunity to return the offender back into society as a useful member.

  2. The British Penal System

    authorities failed to spot their abnormal behaviour, which was evident and went unnoticed in school and was the reason why these children carried out this horrendous murder. The age of the children was also a very debatable issue. People were under the assumption that at that age they could not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work