• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane.

Extracts from this document...


Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane and should not be re-introduced into Australia. Although capital punishment has been abolished, the debate on this topic has never abated. When a particularly heinous crime is committed, this debate arouses strong passions on both sides. Many who advocate the abolition of capital punishment consider the death penalty to be cruel and inhuman, while those who favor of punishment by death see it as a form of just retribution for the gravest of crimes. Determining whether Queensland should re-introduce capital punishment as a sentence will be the focus of this assignment. Capital punishment, also referred to as the death penalty, is the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner as a punishment for a serious crime, often called a capital offence or a capital crime. In those jurisdictions that practice capital punishment, its use is usually restricted to a small number of criminal offences, principally, treason and murder, that is, the deliberate premeditated killing of another person. In the early 18th and 19th century the death penalty was inflicted in many ways. Some ways were, crucifixion, boiling in oil, drawing and quartering, impalement, beheading, burning alive, crushing, tearing asunder, stoning and drowning. In the late 19th century the types of punishments were limited and only a few of them remained permissible by law. In the 19th century capital punishment was to only be inflicted by the methods such as hanging, electrocution, the gas chamber, firing squad and lethal injection. The history of capital punishment in Australia is quite controversial and has been heavily debated since its abolition. ...read more.


Many in the group have lost a family member at the hands of a murderer. Some of these people are in favor of the death penalty, but most suggest that life imprisonment without parole is a more efficient punishment (QLS 2004). Then there is the police, criminologist and civil libertarians, who are strongly opposed to capital punishment, believing that it treats people unfairly and that it is not effective in deterring crime. Then there is also the general public and many religious groups with conflicting opinions on the matter because of their beliefs and attitudes. The government must try to weigh up these different opinions before in order to decide what is best for society as a whole. Those who argue in favor of the death penalty believe that the fear of death deters people from committing crimes. According to the Australian Institute of Criminology, evidence to date has failed to establish that the death penalty is more effective than other less drastic forms of punishment in deterring crime. The Australian homicide rate statistics show that the crime rate remains relatively constant. Trends over the past twenty years demonstrate an increasing number of homicide cases but since the figures are rising more slowly than the population, the homicide rate per capita has actually fallen over this period, from six per hundred thousand to less that 4.4. (Potas, 1987, p.4) A punishment, to be justifiable, should only have a degree of severity which is sufficient to deter others from committing a crime. ...read more.


(Victory, 1994, p.23) In a civilised country, however, it is also unreasonable to engage in deliberate killing. Revenge should not be condoned by a civilised society. It cannot be legally or morally justifiable for the State to sanction and carry out vengeance killings. Some offences are so serious that people often argue that the punishment should be directly proportional to the severity of the nature of the offence. The theory, an eye for an eye, is compatible with the term retribution. In this respect, it is seen as morally right for society to punish offenders directly for the hurt they cause to others (Woodgate, 2003, p.202). However the Queensland Legislative Assembly disagreed with this theory in deciding, in 1922, to amend the Criminal Code to abolish capital punishment. The death penalty is barbaric and inhumane and should not be re-introduced into Australia. The tradition of capital punishment was abolished in Queensland over eighty years ago because it was an unacceptable example of barbarity towards man. There are no compelling arguments to justify the reintroduction of capital punishment in Queensland. Although the death penalty removes dangerous people from society permanently and protects citizens, life imprisonment achieves the same objective. Capital punishment is an ineffective deterrent and it does not provide for clemency and rehabilitation. With the risk of killing an innocent person, it contradicts the international laws of human rights. As a civilized society that promotes the worth of each citizen, the death penalty would not be an appropriate sentence under Queensland's Penalties and Sentences Act 1992. Therefore, in the best interest of both the community and the offender, capital punishment should not be recognized within the Criminal Code as a form of punishment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane and should be banned globally.

    ("From dead kid waking"). Secondly, Death penalty is an inhumane punishment, because criminals and their families are real people too, and there is no humane method of putting a person to death. The fact that criminals and his families are real people is the thing that is always overlooked, they

  2. Capital punishment is the infliction of death by an authorized public authority as punishment ...

    7 Lack of Deterrence: The death penalty has not been shown to be effective in the reduction of the homicide rate. There are some indications that executions actually increase the murder rate. 1 to 6 Cost: The costs to the state of funding appeals by convicted murderers would more than pay for their permanent incarceration.

  1. "Every country should retain the death penalty is the ultimate punishment" - Argue in ...

    Muslims believe that they should be forgiving towards others. No human is free of sin but all Muslims would like to be forgiven for their mistakes by Allah in order to enter paradise. Now I shall look at the view that a utilitarian would have on Capital Punishment. Utilitarianism is the view that before an action is taken you

  2. Important aspects of capital punishment are the methods of execution, costs, and the pros ...

    Fifth, the death penalty is more expensive than life imprisonment. Lawyers are paid an extensive amount of money to keep appealing to the courts.

  1. Capital Punishment

    make the offender more law abiding (even if this is just a fear of being caught and punished again). Other reform aims might include a more compassionate or benevolent understanding of the motives or factors, which led to the offence.

  2. Capital Punishment Workshop.

    To explore the writes and wrongs of capital punishment, we improvised a short piece of drama were a controversial conversation breaks out between people living under Taliban regime. This helped me to understand the different points of views surrounding capital punishment and how/why these points of view are formed in peoples mind.

  1. Why and In What Ways Did Medieval European Attitudes Towards Death Change With the ...

    deferred, thirsting love, that is set on fire of itself (Koslofsky, p.29)". Karlstadt published the first Reformation tract on Purgatory in 1523. It proposed the existence of a "spiritual Purgatory" and "attacked the Roman doctrine which connects Purgatory with suffrages for the dead, asserting that the souls of the departed

  2. Capital Punishment

    the following three individuals: Timothy Evans in 1950, Derek Bentley and Ruth Ellis, the last women to be a victim of the Death Penalty in 1955. The Homicide Act created a number of anomalies: They found theft a punishable crime, whereas rape was over looked, placing property in a higher position than human welfare.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work