• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment Vs Right to Life

Extracts from this document...


Angie Martinez January 3, 2006 Capital Punishment Vs Right to Life Capital punishment is the execution of someone by the state for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. The question of capital punishment, however, lies on whether it is morally right to take away the life of a human being. For instance, religious beliefs oppose to this issue, their idea of God and the right to life is how they base their argument on. On the other hand, the theory of utilitarianism justifies capital punishment as long as it creates a greater balance of happiness vs. unhappiness. The Retribution theory also supports capital punishment, the idea of an eye for an eye and a tooth for tooth is what this principle defines to be human justice. Overall, capital punishment is an issue in which the right to life can be morally argued through the different views and ethical standards of religious beliefs, the theories of utilitarianism and retribution. Christians believe God is the only one who can take away peoples lives. In the early history of Christianity, Christians supported the death penalty on the grounds of secular arguments. For instance, the Pope Innocent III defended the argument of capital punishment when he suggested, "The secular power can, without mortal sin, exercise judgment of blood, provided that it punishes with justice, not out of hatred, with prudence, not precipitation.1" This view changed, with development and value for human life. ...read more.


This is because, it will be benefit society with the deterring of crime and the offender will regret his/ her wrongdoings. The theory of utilitarianism however, does not always endorse that an act will produce the balance of happiness over unhappiness. If a criminal is condemned to the death penalty, it does not mean that it will stop crime from happening. Also, there is no accuracy that it will make an offender feel remorse for the wrong actions committed. Utilitarianism, does not base their argument on justice, instead their defense for capital punishment does not balances out the concern of human welfare. If punishing a criminal deters crime, then there is no reason for the offender to have the right to life. Overall, utilitarians subordinates the right to life argument, because for them punishment is a response to guilt and it what makes Capital punishment accurate in the basis of the balance of happiness over unhappiness. In general, Utilitarianism defends capital punishment, because it will ensure human welfare through the sense guilt that will produce to criminal offenders and the benefits that society will have. The theory of retribution is mostly based in human justice the ideology of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth it's what subordinates their idea of the right to life. Retribution states three points: "All guilty people deserve to be punished, only guilty people deserve to be punished, guilty people deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime"6. ...read more.


In General, the right life is what makes society reflect upon the importance and value of life. If human justice deprives people of their right to life, crime will be induced and social factors will arise within nations. Those who are in favour of capital punishment are most likely to act upon their objectives views and not be concern about the impact that it will have on society. For instance those who follow the theories utilitarianism and retribution, act upon the idea of guilt and punishment. On the other hand religious beliefs who support and oppose the issue take into consideration the idea of the right to life on the basis of higher being whose the only who can take away the right to life of humanity. Overall, capital punishment violates the most valuable right that humans have, promoting human punishment and guilt in a form of senseless laws and theories that are supposedly based in true human justice. 1 British Broadcasting Company, "Religious and ethics." Christianity <http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/ethics/capitalpunishment/>. 2 Gardner C. Hanks, "Against the Death Penalty: Christian and Secular Arguments Against Capital Punishment," Herald Press, (1997) Pg. 30 3 Gail B Stewart, "The Death Penalty" (Opposing Viewpoints Digests), Greenhaven Press, (1998). Pg.113 4 Gail B Stewart, "The Death Penalty" (Opposing Viewpoints Digests), Greenhaven Press, (1998). Pg. 120 5 Anderson, Anderson. "Capital Punishment." <http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/cap-pun.html>. 6 Robinson, Bruce. "CAPITAL PUNISHMENT -- THE DEATH PENALTY." Basic reasons: pro and anti 08 06 1995 <http://www.religioustolerance.org/executb.htm>. 7 British Broadcasting Company, "Religious and ethics." Christianity <http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/ethics/capitalpunishment/>. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. The Impact of the Black Death on the Christian Faith

    (Boccaccio, 1344-1350) Those were the words of Giovanni Boccaccio, an Italian poet who lived from 1313 to 1375, through the Black Death's rampage through Europe, written in his great work named Decameron. In Decameron, he documented the witnessing stories of seven and three wealthy men and women respectively that had survived and lived through the Black Death.

  2. Written Speech: Capital Punishment - MOTION:

    Many of the accused, which are sentenced to death, are hanged. This method often does not kill the criminal straight away, but lets them dangle on the rope tied around their neck, until they die of strangulation, slowly and painfully.

  1. Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868

    Supporters then were unable to argue this point to its full conclusion for fear of being labelled uncivilised themselves, which would have been the next attack by the abolitionists. They, instead, offered a compromise; the loss of the public execution.

  2. &amp;quot;Outline sacred and secular views towards life after death&amp;quot;

    A lot of religions seem to have the same ideas about death and the afterlife. Most believe we will die and then be judged to go to either heaven or hell.

  1. Capital Punishment

    First, as a practical matter, lex talionis retribution cannot be uniformly applied to every harm committed. The second sentence in the above quote from the Law of Hammurabi shows the inherent absurdity of consistent application: "If it [i.e., a collapsed house] kills the son of the owner, then the son of the builder shall be put to death."

  2. Capital Punishment is no longer practised in our society. Explain what differing Christian ...

    Cain expected his punishment, (Genesis 4v14 - "whoever finds me will kill me"). So, Cain's punishment of the death penalty was commuted by God, as God didn't want Adam and Eve to kill their own son. (God had the right to do so).

  1. The three main theories that will be discussed in this essay will stem from ...

    He claimed that in contrast to the mind, the body is that which is extended. It has a material form which can be described in forms of extensional features, for example, size, shape etc... The mind is a personal substance that only the individual can experience and the body's actions are observable to all.

  2. In this philosophical study of applied ethics the concept of punishment will be argued ...

    There is certainly a long tradition to which the bible witnesses, e.g., In Genesis 4:10 after Abel's murder by Cain 'the voice of your brothel's blood is crying to me from the ground'. In contrast to retributive punishment is deterrence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work