• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comment on the first and second way by Aquinas

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aquinas has five proofs for God's existence, as presented by Aquinas Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica (1265-74). But I was asked to comment o the first and second way. Summary of the First Way- St Thomas Aquinas This is the argument from the motion summa Thelogica to a prime mover, Where everything in the universe is either stationary or in motion. So therefore for a stationary object to move it has to come into contact with something already moving, as it cannot move on its self. The thing that is already moving must have been moved by something previously moving. Therefore there is a chain of movement, stretching back into history. This is called the regression of movement. This regression must go backwards forever or there must have been a first thing that moved. ...read more.

Middle

Summary of the Second Way- St Thomas Aquinas This is the argument from Causation to a First Cause. Everything in our universe has a cause. Nothing just happens there always needs to be a cause and the result of a cause is an effect. Nothing in the universe is capable of causing itself. So a cause of an effect must have excited before the cause existed itself. This is a continuing chain and is known as a chain of causes, which is named Regression of Causation. Regression of causation must go backwards forever (infinite regression) or if not that then there must have been a first cause. An infinite regression goes against all experiences of the universes. So there must be a first cause. This first causes cannot have been caused by something else as then it would have been a second cause and therefore not a first cause. ...read more.

Conclusion

But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God The notion of cause and effect, means you cannot have the latter (effect) without the former (cause - here called an efficient cause, because it is the means of bringing another thing into existence, or causing something to change). For Aquinas (and Aristotle) there cannot be an endless regression of cause and effect, and as such there must be a first cause, which is God. The phrase in bold (above) suggests that there would be nothing here, if there was not an original cause of everything. As such, this means that the world and the universe cannot be infinite (i.e. have always existed). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    It would still be based from both sides with fundamental beliefs, that of the existence of God. It would be futile to argue with, for example the atheist who does not have the fundamental start point, that of belief in Gods existence.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The primal crime never took place and even if it had could not have transmitted guilt even if it had. It also weakens the Oedipus complex because the primal crime was an important illustration of its effect on society. Malinowski has attacked the psychological evidence, for Freud's theory to be

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    � This criticism effectively exposes the weakness of arguments based on analogy. The closer the analogy works the less palatable the picture of God: if the analogy does not work then the argument fails anyway. Hume (through Philo) further attacks the analogical basis of the argument by criticising the inadequacy of the analogy: the world is not like a machine.

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    This reference shows that for Thomas belief was not enough, he had to see and touch it before he could believe; this is even after he had seen Jesus perform all his miracles and signs etc. Through Thomas' refusal to believe that Jesus had risen, it proves this situation where

  1. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    It is important to recognize that Aquinas ends up with God as de re necessary - necessary in and of himself and cause of himself. This is NOT meant to be the same as de dicto necessity (logical necessity, based on the way words are used - for instance 'All spinsters are female')

  2. Bereshit, the first word in Genesis translates to "in a beginning"

    Essentially, this is in agreement with van Wolde as both feel that the Priestly source's use of myth is a literary method. In this particular example of the 'primordial sea', the author portrays an uncontested, effortless creation story. Perry shows the allusion to Tiamat's corpse as most likely to be

  1. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    been made through a lack of understanding of the Catholic religion (whether you are Catholic or not), that one can observe not only the 'sin' which Scobie is committing, but also

  2. The First Cause

    It is not, therefore, the First Cause. If 'A' is the first cause, then 'B' must also be the first cause of 'C', and 'C' the first cause of 'D', and so on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work