• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comment on the first and second way by Aquinas

Extracts from this document...


Aquinas has five proofs for God's existence, as presented by Aquinas Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica (1265-74). But I was asked to comment o the first and second way. Summary of the First Way- St Thomas Aquinas This is the argument from the motion summa Thelogica to a prime mover, Where everything in the universe is either stationary or in motion. So therefore for a stationary object to move it has to come into contact with something already moving, as it cannot move on its self. The thing that is already moving must have been moved by something previously moving. Therefore there is a chain of movement, stretching back into history. This is called the regression of movement. This regression must go backwards forever or there must have been a first thing that moved. ...read more.


Summary of the Second Way- St Thomas Aquinas This is the argument from Causation to a First Cause. Everything in our universe has a cause. Nothing just happens there always needs to be a cause and the result of a cause is an effect. Nothing in the universe is capable of causing itself. So a cause of an effect must have excited before the cause existed itself. This is a continuing chain and is known as a chain of causes, which is named Regression of Causation. Regression of causation must go backwards forever (infinite regression) or if not that then there must have been a first cause. An infinite regression goes against all experiences of the universes. So there must be a first cause. This first causes cannot have been caused by something else as then it would have been a second cause and therefore not a first cause. ...read more.


But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God The notion of cause and effect, means you cannot have the latter (effect) without the former (cause - here called an efficient cause, because it is the means of bringing another thing into existence, or causing something to change). For Aquinas (and Aristotle) there cannot be an endless regression of cause and effect, and as such there must be a first cause, which is God. The phrase in bold (above) suggests that there would be nothing here, if there was not an original cause of everything. As such, this means that the world and the universe cannot be infinite (i.e. have always existed). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    � DEMEA - Who puts forward arguments starting from a faith position and who is not directly relevant to the design argument. � Cleanthes first puts forward a version of the Teleological argument: 'Look around the world, contemplate the whole and every part of it: you will find it to

  2. The First Cause

    It is not, therefore, the First Cause. If 'A' is the first cause, then 'B' must also be the first cause of 'C', and 'C' the first cause of 'D', and so on.

  1. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    Part of this would be the explanation of how we view the trinity. "This may not be something that can be rationally approved, apart from Christian revelation." This doctrinal content, inseparable from Christian faith cannot be subsumed or left behind in some new "world theology".

  2. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    Ockham challenged Aquinas' view that an infinite series was impossible. He maintained that causes could be ORIGINATING CAUSES and not CONSERVING CAUSES - in other words, one cause could bring something else into existence but not then have to conserve its existence.

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    The problem of verifying religious experience is an old one. St. Teresa of Avila was accused of being in league with evil spirits, but argued that her vision was of divine origin. St. Teresa was known as a passionate mystic and claimed to have visions, she had no doubt that she had experienced Jesus.

  2. Bereshit, the first word in Genesis translates to "in a beginning"

    Deciphering this would enable a better understanding of the nature of God's creative activity. Here the question is whether God's first creative act is in verse 6: "but streams/mist came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground" or verse 7: "the Lord God formed the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work