• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

COMMENTARY ON TWO SOURCES OF INFORMATION- CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

COURSEWORK B- COMMENTARY ON TWO SOURCES OF INFORMATION- CAPITAL PUNISHMENT "We are concerned here only with the imposition of capital punishment for the crime of murder, and when a life has been taken deliberately by the offender; we cannot say that the punishment is invariably disproportionate to the crime. It is an extreme sanction suitable to the most extreme of crimes" (Potter Stewart, Associate Justice, US Supreme Court) 'Capital Punishment' or the 'Death Penalty' is a way of killing criminals for an offence they have committed. Many countries and nations use the death penalty as their most severe and powerful form of punishment. The death penalty is an arguable issue, and is frequently discussed and talked about in our modern society. In my response to the death penalty, I will be explaining and discussing whether the use of the death penalty is the appropriate and justifiable method for punishing a criminal. I will be doing this by using two sources of information provided by our teacher. These are: The article "Why I'd gladly hang Huntley" by Simon Heffer, and the film, "The life of David Gale" There are many different ways of performing the death penalty. In America, most 38 out of 50 states have the death penalty in use. One of the ways of killing a criminal is hanging them using ropes. If this is done correctly, then upon the criminal's release, the impact of the rope should snap the main vein of the neck, and the neck will be broken. ...read more.

Middle

The methods of punishment in the UK is imprisonment, the maximum of this is life imprisonment, which is used in more extreme cases. The USA is a relevant source of evidence because American society is similar in some ways to the UK. David Gale had his life torn apart and was left in misery when he was falsely accused of raping and murdering one of his students. His respect was wiped out. David Gale wanted to prove that the death penalty is wrong and that innocent people may get executed for nothing. One of Gales' colleagues Constance, who worked with him for Death Watch (an organisation against the use of the death penalty) was very ill, and was dying from Leukaemia. To prove his point, Gale and his colleague set up a plan which would give the impression that he had raped and killed her, when in actual fact Constance had committed suicide. She firstly handcuffed herself and swallowed the key, and then suffocated herself by tying a bag around her neck. David Gale had sex with her and then she committed suicide like in the plan. Gale was falsely found guilty and was sentenced to the death penalty. After Gales' death a videotape showing how Constance really died was found and this proved his point that an innocent person may get executed, and for this he won the Nobel Prize. This source of information is effective because it affects the emotional side of its audience to prove just how wring executing criminals is. ...read more.

Conclusion

where the crime rate is very low and there is little or no crime; the level of crime in these places is considerably lower than here in the UK. With the death penalty in use, criminals will think twice before committing a crime, whereas if they commit a crime here, they know they will be allowed to live for free, feeding off the taxes of hard working people. After looking at the sources, the for and against, I would like to conclude that I am in favour of the death penalty because firstly, my religion teaches it and secondly, I believe that with the death penalty in use, there would be a lot less crime and corruption in our society today. There is the factor that the wrong person may get executed but I think the chances of this happening are very slim as nowadays, we have the aid of forensic science and DNA testing, which will ensure the wrong person doesn't get caught and justice will be done. I think criminals such as Ian Huntley who have been proven guilty, should not be allowed to live. Overall, I think that the issue of the death penalty is very fragile, complex and contentious issue and has both advantages and disadvantages to both sides, and although I feel there cannot be any 'right' or 'wrong' answer towards this issue, I feel we should be ready to reconsider the death penalty as I feel the advantages to this outweigh the disadvantages. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 4 Mohammed Patel 10G4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Death Penalty Opinion.

    Genesis 9:6 says, "whosoever shed's man's blood, by man his blood be shed." This classic argument in favour of the death penalty has been interpreted as a proper and moral reason for putting a murderer to death. The phrase I mentioned earlier,"Let the punishment fit the crime," is its counterpart.

  2. Capital Punishment should not be allowed ...

    But fortunately some of them were still in prison waiting to be executed, who were then released upon receiving the evidences. Another reason is that it costs a lot to execute a person. The capital crime trials cost approximately $2.3 million per case (Fact).

  1. Capital PunishmentShould We Use Capital Punishment?

    This is a valid point but I think the death penalty may be a practical solution because it costs a lot of money to keep people in jail for life.

  2. Article: Capital Controls and Emerging Markets

    When utilizing open capital accounts, policymakers must exercise good judgment in order to maintain investors whereas when capital controls are in place, investors are restricting from moving their monies in the short run. The lifting of capital controls can help to reduce budget deficits, money growth and inflation.

  1. Capital Punishment

    Coffee, people are executed for being innocent then that completely goes against bible in which a man's life is not to be taken if he has not done anything wrong. In the Green Mile, towards the end of the film the guards realised that Coffee was innocent, they wanted to

  2. The issue of Capital punishment as in the film

    In "Dead Man Walking" Mr Percy, a victims dad says "I'm going to watch you fry, watch you sizzle" This right of having revenge on a person who has committed a crime on you stems from the extensively quoted biblical text, "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a

  1. Capital Punishment: Justice for All?

    The death penalty alone imposes an irrevocable sentence. Once an inmate is executed, nothing can be done to make amends if a mistake has been made. There is considerable evidence that many mistakes have been made in sentencing people to death.

  2. Is an eye for an eye a legal remedy in the 21st century?

    . by . . . a public official.... The US has signed this convention and ratified it however due to their exercise of the death penalty they breach the laws that are enriched in this convention. The United Nations is the only international government body that is set out to protect the Rights of Humans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work