• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consequentialism and Consequentialists

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Consequentialism Good and evil are two of the most over used words in the English language, as are the words right and wrong, and yet, these concept are not even fully understood. How can one differentiate between good and evil, or decide what is right and wrong? How is it possible to know whether one's actions are just? Are these judgments based simply on preference and partiality, or rather, is there valid rationale behind these decisions? Are there foundations for either side of such controversial issues such as euthanasia, or are these opinions based merely on self-interest? These questions are generally associated with the ideas of moral philosophy, more commonly known as ethics. As something ethical is the equivalent of something good and just, the prior questions can be rephrased simply as, "how do we know, if at all, that our behaviour is ethical?" There are several approaches to answering this question, all based principally on reason, most often falling into the categories of consequentialist, duty-based, and virtue based theories, but the question remains, do these theories answer all ethical questions? As well, there seems to be an inherent tendency in all of these methods towards preference vs. ...read more.

Middle

The lack of emphasis on consequences can be understood by the fact that it is not always possible to control the effects of your actions, therefore, it is the intentions that must be given the most clout. The most common form of duty based theory, is religious ethics, or in the west, Christian ethics. Morality is based on the Bible, as the Bible sets out certain duties that must be followed no matter what. This makes everything simple, since the word of God determines what is right and wrong. The advantages of this theory is that for straight forward situations, the answer as to what is right and wrong, is quite obviously laid out. However, life is not straightforward, and often, the Bible will not clearly state the solution to any given situation. As well there are other problems with this theory. First of all, if right is dictated by God's will, then what exactly is God's will? If one were to find God's will within the Bible, this would seem simple enough, but the Bible itself is open to many different interpretations, on many different occasions. Second, how does one know that there is a god at all? ...read more.

Conclusion

As previously stated, most often, even within the theories themselves, biases are frequently visited, and the problem with this is that a bias is simply an opinion, and does not state whether something is universally right or wrong, which the question of ethics demands. The purpose of ethics is to provide a standard for judgement, and if this cannot be provided, then how is it possible to be sure one's actions are ethical? For if something is ethical, should it not be universally so? As such, while it is possible to have some inkling of right and wrong, even using these methods, it is impossible to determine what is ethical, for first, how can one determine which method to use, especially when they contradict each other, and second, how does one conquer the problems with each method when it becomes necessary. Since all this gives us interpretations of what is ethical, it is possible to gain some guidance from these theories, however, ultimately, the question of ethics may come down to preference. Therefore, it is not possible, beyond reasonable doubt in most cases, to know if our behaviour is ethical or not. 1 James Fieser, "Ethics [Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy]" http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/e/ethics.htm Accessed January 8, 2002 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Aristotle - Virtue Ethics Essay

    Macintyre criticises Bentham by claming that morality cannot be solved by pseudo-scientific moral calculations and that it is impossible to expect people to rationalise in this way in a pressurising moral dilemma. Were a person to be virtuous, such a calculation would not be necessary because the individual would internally

  2. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    However there are claims that the contributors to virtue theory have certain prejudices. For example Aristotle was said to have been sexist and ageist. Therefore some of his views may have stemmed from this prejudice, which would essentially make some of his views unacceptable in today's society.

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Aristotle would argue that ethics is subjective in its nature and therefore you can formulate some general principles but not expect them to hold. He states, 'to ask how a man should behave towards his wife or in general how one should conduct any relationship with someone else seems to

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    What they are saying is that the motive behind such actions is always ultimately selfish. For example, a man who is in a position to save a persons life, may do so because everyone will look up to them, or because they would not be able to live with themselves

  1. Explain ethical egoism. Do you believe that it is true? Why or why not?

    decide whether to live to live or die, and we must choose to take care of our lives if we choose to live. Its primary goal is "life" and its standard of value is "does this action lead to my self interest?"

  2. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    is there to say that enjoying a four course gourmet meal is not the same as enjoying a book of poetry? Furthermore, is the pleasure good simply because it is desirable or because it is actually good? This was further developed by G.

  1. Explain how Macintyre's or Aristotle's account of a life lived in accordance with virtues ...

    By using the golden mean Aristotle believed people could excel and become virtuous. The golden mean means having everything in the right amount. Everyone obviously needs to consume in order to live, but is it really necessary to continuously spend money to try and make yourself feel satisfied?

  2. Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

    Also the sixth commandment states that "Thou shalt not kill." and allowing people to die by not taking action is, in the eyes of the lord, murder. However the Bible also says that God gave the planet to humans for them to use to develop themselves and use its resources

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work