• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the major arguments for and against voluntary, involuntary and non-voluntary Euthanasia.

Extracts from this document...


Shaun Kennedy Essay on Euthanasia Consider the major arguments for and against voluntary, involuntary and non-voluntary Euthanasia. Voluntary Euthanasia is a choice made by a person who may be suffering from an illness or disease and has come to the conclusion that they want their life to come to an end. A utilitarian approach to this conclusion made by a person can work both ways by either agreeing or disagreeing with the person. Being a utilitarian is all about doing what is better for the greater good, so on one hand you may have him saying that it will minimise suffering and may eventually lead to a change in the law where euthanasia will be made legal in more countries. ...read more.


Emotivists would also have something to say on the matter and would say that a persons view on euthanasia is just an expression of emotion as where a Utilitarian saying voluntary euthanasia is right is merely just expressing compassion. Involuntary euthanasia, this is where the person doesn't want euthanasia and has gone against there will in making them have it, this could also be looked at as murder. The only real way of justifying this is by a person who believes that they can decide that someone else's life is valueless even though the person would disagree an example of this could be that someone has said whilst they were well that they would never want euthanasia but then they have got really ill and someone else decides there life isn't worth living and is valueless. ...read more.


Non-voluntary euthanasia is where the person with the illness or disease is not in a position to choose because of their illness so a family member makes the choice. A utilitarian talking about this would say that it may be right because it may be what the person would want and would be for the greater good but on the other hand it may put fear into other people making them think that once they aren't able to make decisions for themselves that the decision for them to die is put in someone else's hands, a utilitarian would not want a society like this. A deontologist would argue that it is a persons duty to alleviate suffering and not to let someone continue with their life if deemed unnecessary, but he would also again have to bring up the set of rules that says about not killing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. Euthanasia essay

    it is the refusal to accept euthanasia which , in some cases , is horrific. The law causes problems when euthanaisa come in to play as it is still seen as sucide in some places, and as sucide is a crime it is against the law to commit euthanasia.

  2. Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his ...

    Ken and his bed are in the centre of the stage, with other rooms and places around the stage, the debate is argued in many of these rooms, Dr. Emerson tries to make his point in many of the rooms, like in his office.

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    For example, in one interview with Sree Kallid who is Muslim, when asked if religion affected his view on Euthanasia he said: "Definitely. I believe Euthanasia is very wrong. Since I was a young boy my parents and religion have taught me to respect life, and god who gave it to us.

  2. Is Voluntary Euthanasia right?

    When some agrees to voluntary euthanasia, the doctor is expected to carry the incidence out. When someone becomes a doctor, their job is to save lives. This is proved when they take a Hippocratic Oath, their job isn't to take lives.

  1. Choose a case which you consider to be of crucial importance for medical ethics ...

    to what was described by the court as the extremely distressing and undignified final stages of the disease. Sympathisers of Mrs Pretty would agree, as she argued, that to have to continue in this way violated the idea that no one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, that being article three of convention.

  2. Evaluate the Ethical Arguments For and Against Voluntary Euthanasia

    Test' can be used to decide this: 'The case established that a doctor is not negligent if he acts in accordance with a responsible body of medical opinion, even if that opinion is the minority.' The fact that passive euthanasia is already practised can be an argument for voluntary active euthanasia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work