• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Creationism Isn't Science but Belongs in Schools

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Robyn St. Hilaire English 102-002 Essay #1 Creationism Isn't Science but Belongs in Schools The origin of life has been a point of discussion for as long as history has been documented. Ancient Egyptians believed that the sun god Ra took another form, created land from a watery abyss and created everything, including gods and humans. The Iroquois, a tribe of Native Americans, told a story of god to human lineage that resulted in twins, one being evil and one being good. The good twin creates a picture perfect world. The evil twin reverses the good twin's actions by making things more complex and difficult for humans. Christians and Jews believe that God, their only god, created the earth and the heavens in six days, and on the seventh day he rested. Secular humanists believe that the earth was created from a large cosmic explosion and that the living organisms on the earth have evolved from bacteria. ...read more.

Middle

Eldredge's main point is simply that creationism isn't a science and evolution is a vital theory in the field of science. The idea is basic; the theory of evolution is based in science and therefore is to be taught in a science curriculum. Evolution is the theory that there is "one basic scheme of similarities interlocking all of life." This theory is usually studied in biological fields but is useful in a number of other scientific fields. By explaining the uses of evolution in some scientific fields, Eldredge makes the point that evolution needs to be taught (519). This is an irrefutable argument. It is obvious that the solution to this debate is not that evolution is not worth studying which would allow for all theories of creation to be taken from the schools. This leads back to the creationist argument that because both creationism and evolution are theories they both deserve to be taught in schools equally. ...read more.

Conclusion

Evolution is science based and leads to a better understanding of science. It needs to be taught and it needs to be taught in a science classroom. It is easily understandable that creation theories are not science based and are instead mythological in their basis, so teach them in a subject that covers mythology. The discussion of creation is something that has been and will continue to be a part of human life. It is only fair that we educate our children in these different theories in order to allow them to decide which fits their personal belief systems best. I believe that the theories should be taught in subjects that correspond to their basis. According to Eldredge's essay this statement should be a fair decision to end the on going debate, but it is my feeling that Eldredge would rather throw out all other theories of creation keeping only evolution. Eldredge's essay shows that creationism should be taken from the science classrooms, but what I feel Eldredge meant to say is that creationism should be taken from schools completely. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    He therefore failed to take account of cultures based on female deities or those, which have no object of worship, for example Buddhism. Freud also ignores the Trobriand society, so he creates a theory to explain the societies and religions of those he was familiar with and ignored others.

  2. Creation vs. Evolution?

    Evolutionists generally believe in the Big Bang theory. This theory is that before time and space, there existed an extremely high density moment, which increased in density forming the first protons and neutrons. From there, the plasma radiated outward forming larger atoms and in the end formed the universe and all the atoms that exist today (Trefil 24-29).

  1. Religion & Science'.

    It also says that God placed a tent in the heavens for the sun to rest during night. On the other hand Exodes teaches that creation took six days. However, some Christians believe that God created the world but instead of creating it all once, He took a long time i.e.

  2. Revelation Essay

    God no longer needed to reveal Himself as a being, but instead his intentions for His people. God sent His only son to communicate to us that there is a way to be followed, to follow the path of Christ.

  1. Philosophy discussion

    Socrates believed in principles that he upheld. He knew that he did not know very much, and this made him much smarter than other people. Socrates had faith in human reason and believed that people were only happy when they acted according to their reason.

  2. Good and Evil

    Hell is the ultimate alienation from God, he said. Firstly although this argument appeals powerfully to many modern thinkers, it is essentially un-Christian. The Bible portrays Satan and sin as active, independent forces against which one must struggle, they are therefore not mere voids. Secondly, if to be with God is good; to be distant from him is evil,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work