• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Creationism Isn't Science but Belongs in Schools

Extracts from this document...


Robyn St. Hilaire English 102-002 Essay #1 Creationism Isn't Science but Belongs in Schools The origin of life has been a point of discussion for as long as history has been documented. Ancient Egyptians believed that the sun god Ra took another form, created land from a watery abyss and created everything, including gods and humans. The Iroquois, a tribe of Native Americans, told a story of god to human lineage that resulted in twins, one being evil and one being good. The good twin creates a picture perfect world. The evil twin reverses the good twin's actions by making things more complex and difficult for humans. Christians and Jews believe that God, their only god, created the earth and the heavens in six days, and on the seventh day he rested. Secular humanists believe that the earth was created from a large cosmic explosion and that the living organisms on the earth have evolved from bacteria. ...read more.


Eldredge's main point is simply that creationism isn't a science and evolution is a vital theory in the field of science. The idea is basic; the theory of evolution is based in science and therefore is to be taught in a science curriculum. Evolution is the theory that there is "one basic scheme of similarities interlocking all of life." This theory is usually studied in biological fields but is useful in a number of other scientific fields. By explaining the uses of evolution in some scientific fields, Eldredge makes the point that evolution needs to be taught (519). This is an irrefutable argument. It is obvious that the solution to this debate is not that evolution is not worth studying which would allow for all theories of creation to be taken from the schools. This leads back to the creationist argument that because both creationism and evolution are theories they both deserve to be taught in schools equally. ...read more.


Evolution is science based and leads to a better understanding of science. It needs to be taught and it needs to be taught in a science classroom. It is easily understandable that creation theories are not science based and are instead mythological in their basis, so teach them in a subject that covers mythology. The discussion of creation is something that has been and will continue to be a part of human life. It is only fair that we educate our children in these different theories in order to allow them to decide which fits their personal belief systems best. I believe that the theories should be taught in subjects that correspond to their basis. According to Eldredge's essay this statement should be a fair decision to end the on going debate, but it is my feeling that Eldredge would rather throw out all other theories of creation keeping only evolution. Eldredge's essay shows that creationism should be taken from the science classrooms, but what I feel Eldredge meant to say is that creationism should be taken from schools completely. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    Although, the curse brought conflict, disease, and death, much of the original beauty can still be seen in God's creation.

  2. Creation vs. Evolution?

    It is still unknown what existed before the Big Bang, and also, it is impossible for scientists to know what first propagated the conversion from vacuum to matter. This is where the Christian belief enters the picture. It is actually quite easy to accept that God's creative moment was in

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    This leads to the conclusion that sexual guilt is not the cause of religion, thus does not have the evidence to support the argument. The third criticism is that Freud depends on a narrow selection of evidence. His theories relied upon the traditional father figure of Christianity and Judaism.

  2. Revelation Essay

    God no longer needed to reveal Himself as a being, but instead his intentions for His people. God sent His only son to communicate to us that there is a way to be followed, to follow the path of Christ.

  1. Religion & Science'.

    There are various other beliefs within Christianity about how the world began. The book of Job writes that the earth was created on a single morning whereas Psalm describes that the earth was firmly laid on its foundation and God stretched the heavens like a curtain and laid the beams of His chambers in the seas.

  2. Evolutionism vs Creationism

    Creationists believe in God. What is God? God is an imaginary spiritual force. It's highly unlikely that God is involved in the evolution. Bible states "So God created man in his own image". (Genesis 1:27) Since many evidences are proving that humans evolved from Homo sapiens then what does God look like?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work