• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Discuss D.Z. Phillips Conception of Immortality.

Extracts from this document...


Critically Discuss D.Z. Phillips Conception of Immortality In his book 'Death and Immortality', D Z Phillips starts by asking the question: does belief in immortality rest on a mistake? The first two chapters are negative in the sense that they examine traditional philosophical, as well as common sense, conceptions of what immortality means. Phillips argues that philosophical analyses centred on the notion of immortality have generally been constructed around certain essential presuppositions: presuppositions that assume some form of continuation of personal identity after death. One cannot logically deny that, by definition, death entails the end of bodily existence, so one, it seems, is logically drawn to the notion that survival after death entails the survival of some kind of non-bodily identity - the soul. In the last two chapters Phillips disputes this presupposition, claiming that a perfectly valid conception of immortality can be maintained without resorting to any form of dualism. Phillips gives an alternative account of immortality based, not on any realm of existence beyond this life, but on certain moral and religious modes of living within this life. Unlike some of writers, e.g. R. Swinburn, D Z Phillips does not support the notion that belief in continuous personal existence is logically defendable. Indeed, he provides an extremely robust argument to the contrary, claiming that such claims are open to fatal logical objections. ...read more.


And it is in this context that we should view the concept of immortality. Phillips is making an important distinction here: the distinction between a belief as empirical proposition and a belief in terms of faith, that is seeing one's life in context of certain eternal, and non-temporal considerations. I.e. "I believe that God exists" is an empirical proposition, whereas "I believe in God" is a statement about one's faith and moral commitments. This is a critical distinction because it is in "believing" in the second sense, that we come to understand the meaning and value of self-renunciation , and thus , journey from the temporal to the eternal. This is the religious conception of "dying to the self" and Phillips wants to say that this is the true Christian message that is so often lost when the scriptures are read too literally. Very much linked to the concept of immortality is the big moral question that has occupied philosophers for centuries, namely: why should I live a good life? A superficial reading of the scriptures provides a simple answer i.e. our conduct in this world is rewarded or punished in the next world. Philips does more than merely disagree with this reading, here he draws on Simone Veil, arguing that such a conception of immortality is positively harmful because all notions of compensation in the next life for ...read more.


Again, if the meaning of the picture is seen in these terms then who is Phillips to take that picture a way? The question is: is Phillips's picture truer, more meaningful, or more valuable than any other is pictures? Phillips certainly believes that he is touching on the original meaning. He argues that this meaning is not only found in the scriptures but goes back as far as Plato. (The Christian concept of immortality is thought to be based on the platonic theme) He criticises those who fail to read the whole meaning. For example, of Geach and Flew he says: "my quarrel... is not of what they say they find in the Phaedo, but because that is all they find their" (P46). Phillips picks up on Plato's idea of "purification", arguing that this refers to the differentiation between doing an apparent morally commendable deed, but impurely (essentially for the good of the doer) and acting morally for the right reason (for the sake of the good). As for the question of whether Phillips's conception of immortality is more valuable than any other concept of immortality? Well, Phillips, being a philosopher, would certainly argued for the value of the truth over falsity. But whether those of a non- philosophical disposition could find meaning, and those of a spiritually insecure disposition could if find solace in Phillips's conception of immortality is perhaps doubtful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Is There Life After Death?

    In the short breath of life we have, we do not earn enough evil to reason being burned forever. Often, I think people are punished here on earth in the form of prison or execution. A further punishment is not necessarily warranted unless the person has not changed their ideas of what they did.

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    � DEMEA - Who puts forward arguments starting from a faith position and who is not directly relevant to the design argument. � Cleanthes first puts forward a version of the Teleological argument: 'Look around the world, contemplate the whole and every part of it: you will find it to

  1. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    As everything has a purpose, nothing exists unless it of some use to man, we should use other creatures as we wish and see fit[7]. However, contrary to this, deep ecologists are often attracted to Aristotle's philosophy as he considered the world to be a whole, with all beings striving to reach their purpose, or 'end'.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Society depends on structure and organisation and those who have the responsibility to govern with authority will no doubly conflict with those of the individual. Religion provides a reason to submit to authority, explaining our suffering in terms of the need to obey an omnipotent God and the promise of the afterlife makes society bearable.

  1. Discuss critically the advantages and disadvantages of accepting that New Testament texts are literal.

    of God, and the New Testament is focussed on the actions of Christ, christocentric soteriology and Christology. Furthermore, as mentioned before, there are contradictions in the bible, and the New Testament is not exempt from this. In Acts of the Apostles, Christians are told of St Paul's religious experience on the road to Damascus.

  2. Assess Critically the Claim that the Concept of Supremely Perfect Being is Incoherent.

    If a Supremely Perfect Being knew future contingents, that I would lose (or win), then it is not a future contingent, it would be a fact and could not be different. Nevertheless, if a Supremely Perfect Being knows the future, then it will necessarily come to pass, meaning if a

  1. Preliminary Interpretation of Descartes Meditations

    This alone cannot be detached from me. I am, I exist; that is certain" But for how long? If he stops thinking does that mean he no longer exists? Descartes would accept this as he says "But for how long? As long as I think, for it might possibly happen if I ceased completely to think that

  2. Death and Dying

    Thieves for example are spend eternity in a snake pit. Finally, the ninth 'pit' is the lowest 'pit' of all. It is a chamber filled with ice and is punishment for those who've betrayed others. These souls are frozen in the iced lake, accompanied by the devil.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work