• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Discuss D.Z. Phillips Conception of Immortality.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically Discuss D.Z. Phillips Conception of Immortality In his book 'Death and Immortality', D Z Phillips starts by asking the question: does belief in immortality rest on a mistake? The first two chapters are negative in the sense that they examine traditional philosophical, as well as common sense, conceptions of what immortality means. Phillips argues that philosophical analyses centred on the notion of immortality have generally been constructed around certain essential presuppositions: presuppositions that assume some form of continuation of personal identity after death. One cannot logically deny that, by definition, death entails the end of bodily existence, so one, it seems, is logically drawn to the notion that survival after death entails the survival of some kind of non-bodily identity - the soul. In the last two chapters Phillips disputes this presupposition, claiming that a perfectly valid conception of immortality can be maintained without resorting to any form of dualism. Phillips gives an alternative account of immortality based, not on any realm of existence beyond this life, but on certain moral and religious modes of living within this life. Unlike some of writers, e.g. R. Swinburn, D Z Phillips does not support the notion that belief in continuous personal existence is logically defendable. Indeed, he provides an extremely robust argument to the contrary, claiming that such claims are open to fatal logical objections. ...read more.

Middle

And it is in this context that we should view the concept of immortality. Phillips is making an important distinction here: the distinction between a belief as empirical proposition and a belief in terms of faith, that is seeing one's life in context of certain eternal, and non-temporal considerations. I.e. "I believe that God exists" is an empirical proposition, whereas "I believe in God" is a statement about one's faith and moral commitments. This is a critical distinction because it is in "believing" in the second sense, that we come to understand the meaning and value of self-renunciation , and thus , journey from the temporal to the eternal. This is the religious conception of "dying to the self" and Phillips wants to say that this is the true Christian message that is so often lost when the scriptures are read too literally. Very much linked to the concept of immortality is the big moral question that has occupied philosophers for centuries, namely: why should I live a good life? A superficial reading of the scriptures provides a simple answer i.e. our conduct in this world is rewarded or punished in the next world. Philips does more than merely disagree with this reading, here he draws on Simone Veil, arguing that such a conception of immortality is positively harmful because all notions of compensation in the next life for ...read more.

Conclusion

Again, if the meaning of the picture is seen in these terms then who is Phillips to take that picture a way? The question is: is Phillips's picture truer, more meaningful, or more valuable than any other is pictures? Phillips certainly believes that he is touching on the original meaning. He argues that this meaning is not only found in the scriptures but goes back as far as Plato. (The Christian concept of immortality is thought to be based on the platonic theme) He criticises those who fail to read the whole meaning. For example, of Geach and Flew he says: "my quarrel... is not of what they say they find in the Phaedo, but because that is all they find their" (P46). Phillips picks up on Plato's idea of "purification", arguing that this refers to the differentiation between doing an apparent morally commendable deed, but impurely (essentially for the good of the doer) and acting morally for the right reason (for the sake of the good). As for the question of whether Phillips's conception of immortality is more valuable than any other concept of immortality? Well, Phillips, being a philosopher, would certainly argued for the value of the truth over falsity. But whether those of a non- philosophical disposition could find meaning, and those of a spiritually insecure disposition could if find solace in Phillips's conception of immortality is perhaps doubtful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    We must use our reasoning to search for and pursue the purpose that God has put into the world as its creator. However, human initiative is brought into question when we start using this 'reason' and intelligence to build nuclear bombs capable of destroying the entire planet several times over,

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Yet it has attracted new criticisms. Irenaeus view that everyone goes to heaven has attracted new criticism because it seems unjust, thus calling God justice into question. Christians and religious believers have called this theory into question because it contradicts religious texts, including the bible and the Qur'an, which promise punishment for the unrighteous.

  1. Is There Life After Death?

    Memories form the spirit that reincarnationists say moves from body to body. The spirit is born into the world again and lives another life. Yet when a baby is born, it has no memories. Many do not believe in reincarnation because it cannot be proven scientifically.

  2. Discuss critically the advantages and disadvantages of accepting that New Testament texts are literal.

    are accepted without doubt, yet it is difficult to reconcile with many of the theories of modern science, particularly those theories which deal with the origins of the universe and the origins of humanity. Additionally, the New Testament is not a single text, but a collection of 27 books.

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    - the first by David Hume and the second stemming from the work of DARWIN. David Hume Note that Hume's points were put forward 22 years BEFORE Paley's - they were not after Paley. It is a mistake, therefore, to say that Hume was replying to Paley - it is

  2. Death and Dying

    Evangelical Protestants believe in resurrection, and that when people die, their souls wait until Judgement Day, then the dead will be raised to join the living in the presence of God, not knowing the length of time they had been waiting.

  1. Preliminary Interpretation of Descartes Meditations

    he cannot believe he has a body or that he even senses a real world truly. Finally he concludes that he is a thing that thinks. "To think? That's it. It is thought. This alone cannot be detached from me.

  2. God does not play dice, discuss.

    "The ozone gas layer is a mighty proof of the creator's forethought. Could anyone attribute this device to a chance evolutionary process? A wall which prevents death to every living thing, just the right thickness and exactly the correct defence gives evidence of a plan" Hence the sheer complexities and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work