• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


CRITICALLY EXAMINE THE CULTURAL EXPLANATIONS OF POVERTY In order to analyse the different cultural explanations of poverty, first we have to understand what poverty is. It can be defined by an absolute or relative definition. In an absolute definition, poverty is the complete lack of essential means to survive, such as food, shelter and clothing. However, in a relative definition, poverty means: "... the lack of resources to obtain the types of diet, participate in the activities and have the living conditions and amenities which are customary, or at least widely encouraged or approved, in the societies to which the individual belongs" (Townsend, 1979, "Poverty in the United Kingdom", cited in Stephens, 1998, p. 259). Such broad definitions lead to several explanations of poverty. Some are cultural (where the culture or the individual is to blame), others are structural (the blame is on the society, its structures). This essay will only focus on the cultural explanations of poverty, by analysing the culture of poverty, the culture of dependency and the cycle of deprivation. The culture of poverty is one of the cultural explanations and had its origins in the work of the American anthropologist Oscar Lewis, who studied poor communities in Mexico and Puerto Rico in the 1950s and 1960s (Taylor, 1995, p.182). ...read more.


73). On the other hand, they suggest that this explanation is convenient for those in power, because it puts the blame of poverty on the poor themselves. Another cultural explanation for poverty is the culture of dependency, which began with the politics of the Conservative government (1979-97) of Margaret Thatcher and John Major and was associated with the ideas of the New Right. They claimed that the welfare state was the cause of poverty, leading to a culture of dependency on benefits. Due to the increase of taxes, in order to support the bill of benefits, it discourages the efforts of businessmen to start new companies which would create new jobs. Besides, the welfare state undermines the will to work, providing free healthcare and financial support for those who do not want to work (Moore, 2001, p. 144). David Marsland argues that the welfare "hand-outs" - benefits, encourages people to stay unemployed, discourages self-improvement through education (Haralambos, 2000, p. 318). Marsland believes that benefits should only be awarded to groups/individuals that are really in need, such as the sick and disable, or the people who are unable to help themselves. He is particularly critical of the universal welfare provision (provision for all members of society regardless of whether they are on low or high income). ...read more.


Some of these disadvantages may be the result of children from low income families being "labelled" as a problem". (Taylor, 1995, p. 183). However, Rutter and Madge also point out that half of the children who were born in disadvantaged homes do not repeat the cycle of disadvantage in the next generation. On the other hand, many people who weren't brought up by disadvantaged parents became disadvantaged in some point of their lives. Another criticism is based on the fact that it only explains why poverty continues but not how it first begins (Browne, 1992, p.73). In conclusion, for Oscar Lewis the cause of poverty is the different culture that the poor have, because it leaves them without hope for a better future (fatalism and resignation). Others sociologists argue that it's the dependency on benefits that causes poverty because it discourages people from looking for better alternatives or jobs and keeps the poor dependent on the welfare state. Finally, others suggested that the cycle of deprivation is the cause of poverty because the poverty of parents is passed on to their children (Taylor, 1995, p. 183), creating a cycle of disadvantage. Above all, the different cultural explanations of poverty are all linked and they all blame the poor for their own poverty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development essays

  1. This essay outlines, contrasts and critically discusses two definitions of poverty, namely absolute and ...

    are so limited as to exclude them from the minimum acceptable way of life in the Member State to which they belong.' This definition, which has been adopted for use within the United Kingdom, is based on the notion of relative poverty, but may also incorporate aspects of absolute poverty.

  2. How far were changing attitudes towards the poor between 1834 – 1900 due to ...

    As a result of this, Manufacturers found themselves in financial difficulties, and a popular idea in this context was that maybe the poor were poor because of the same reasons. That if a manager of a business was suffering financial problems due to economic circumstances, then maybe the poor were suffering because of this too.

  1. Wealth and poverty essay

    the community; to pay debts on behalf of those owing money to pay employees collecting zakah. Zakah is only given to Muslims. None Muslims and those who need help in international disasters are helped to Sadaqah. This is additional aid given out of compassion to others in need, and need not to be simple financial assistance.

  2. Explain the terms 'Relative poverty', 'Absolute Poverty' and 'Culture of Poverty'.

    The subculture shared by the poor, (researches argue) are in the 'culture of poverty' "by the time slum children are aged six or seven, they have usually absorbed the basic values and attitudes of their subculture". According to Lewis the 'Culture of Poverty' includes;a transmition from one generation to the next; a strong present time orientation; a sense

  1. To What Extent Is the Welfare State Responsible For Creating a Culture of Dependency?

    The values and behaviour (the culture) of these poor people was significantly different from the majority of the population. Lewis argued that this was because these particular values enabled the very poor to cope with circumstances which would otherwise lead to despair and hopelessness.

  2. The Relation Between Consumerism and Poverty

    In a consumer society, this 'normal life' is consumers trying to achieve the pleasure that they think they must have in order to be happy. "A happy life, as defined by consumer culture, is life insured against boredom...in which constantly 'something happens'"7 Largely, a problem is that the poor live

  1. Identify four causes of the increase in poverty and vagrancy in the Tudor period.

    This type of law was typical of the early Tudor period, it set about not to help the vagrants but to suppress them. The law set about to punish vagrants and threaten them into getting a job, this did not relieve poverty and vagrancy but certainly suppressed it.

  2. Wealth and Poverty

    These countries have an extremely low standard of living. They only use 25 per cent of the world's resources, although 75 per cent of the world's population lives there. Where as the First World countries like North America, West Europe, and Australasia in the rich Northern.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work