• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true? The Argument from Design assumes the existence of a Higher Intelligence who designed the universe with a sense of purpose. Pre Darwin, it was thought that this was evident in the apparent design of nature. Darwin's discovery of natural selection explained the complexities of the adaptive qualities evident in nature without the need to postulate an Omnipotent being. This became the more persuasive alternative. Post Darwin, the revised Argument from Design claims that; although Darwin probably gave a correct account for the process of evolution, it is not an ultimate one: The ultimate explanation and simplest hypothesis is that the process was masterminded by a designer God. William Paley (1743-1805) believed that human and animal bodies were like extremely complicated machines and such beautiful organisation could not be produced by chance. He famously coined the analogy of a watchmaker to demonstrate this argument: ".....every indication of contrivance, every manifestation of design which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature; with the difference on the side of nature, of being greater and more, and that in a degree which exceeds all computation." ...read more.

Middle

Anthony Kenny asserts that Darwin may be correct that the natural system is mechanistic in structure, but it can still operate teleologically: "The argument was only that the ultimate explanation of such adaptation be found in intelligence; and if the argument was correct, then any Darwinian success merely inserts an extra step between the phenomena and their ultimate explanation ". (Destiny, Purpose and Faith, p.72) For an ultimate explanation, there must be an account as to why and how the laws of evolution occurred in the first place. Dawkins assumes that we must just accept that they came about by some fortuitous coincidence. Most advocates of the Argument from Design do not dispute that Darwin was correct about natural selection, only that it cannot be assumed that there is not a Higher Intelligence responsible for guiding the evolutionary process. And furthermore, can use modern scientific research to support this. Physicist and theist, Russell Stannard puts forward the reviewed argument; in order for evolution to happen the characteristics of the physical world and the conditions under which they met were of such remarkable precision that it is practically impossible to believe they were subject to chance and not controlled by a Mind or Designer. ...read more.

Conclusion

God is the only unknown quantity in the theists' argument as oppose to the infinite unknowns in the infinite universes theory. But God is an entirely unknown entity, immune to empirical investigation, whereas the universe is physical in nature so at least, in principle, can be studied. Although for theists' like Stannard and Swinbourne God is not an unknown. The believer feels validation of God's existence in their everyday human experience. To ask someone of religious persuasion to accept that this God was ultimately responsible for fine tuning the universe is not asking them to accept anything new and is surely the ultimate and the only explanation which they seek.. For atheists like Dawkins though, there is no sufficient reason to postulate a designer God to explain the existence of the universe. However, Dawkins is also unsuccessful in concluding that Darwin completely undermined the Argument from Design. In light of Darwin's discoveries, Paley was wrong to assume that the existence of a designer God could be inferred from the apparent purpose serving order of the natural world. Yet, evolution theory fails to account for the mysterious series of coincidences under which the fabrics of the universe were formed. Neo-Darwinians have not provided enough evidence to disprove that a Higher Intelligence was ultimately responsible. Therefore Darwin's theory of evolution does not completely undermine the Argument from Design. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    (Darwin, Origin of Species, 1859) His ideas were even more radical than those of Hume, as they suggested that God did not exist at all, and everything was all part of evolution. This theory is backed up by Richard Dawkins who rejects any idea of design in the world, and

  2. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    John Stuart Mill builds upon the idea of the imperfections of the world and the existence of evil. In his book "Three essays of Religion" he argues that "the apparent imperfections in the Universe and the amount of natural evils that occur, the most plausible hypothesis were either to deny the designer's goodness or to deny the designer's omnipotence."

  1. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    In the Holy Quran there are many verses which state that there is only one God and that he is the creator and Lord of everything that exists. Muslims believe in 'Thauhid' which believes that there is only one God who has no partners.

  2. Outline and Critically Evaluate the design Argument

    A more famous Critic to this argument is Charles Darwin. In his travels among the Galapagos Islands, he noted that Giant tortoises belonging to different islands had distinguishing features that differed to their relatives. He concluded that the tortoises had somehow adapted to their environment to suit their needs.

  1. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    Paley argues that this order and regulation is so complex that the universe can't have come about by chance; and that it implies a universe-maker in the same way that the watch had a watch-maker. This universe-maker can be called God.

  2. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    It is in this sense that the Cosmological argument is sometimes held to depend on the Ontological, as the Ontological argument starts from the definition that God is the most perfect possible being. Ockham's point might be re-stated by claiming that this position is needed by Christianity but cannot be established by the Cosmological argument.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Design qua purpose looks at the evidence of design and how parts of the universe fit together for a purpose. The first part of the philosopher William Paley's argument, derived from design qua purpose. He expresses his argument in a simple analogy, if one was to come across a watch

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    This result is of momentous significance, for it implies that if the universe contains evenly distributed matter then its existence is temporally limited. If the universe is contracting at an ever increasing rate, then it cannot contract forever but must eventually reach an endpoint, when it curves to a point and its radius becomes zero.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work