• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true? The Argument from Design assumes the existence of a Higher Intelligence who designed the universe with a sense of purpose. Pre Darwin, it was thought that this was evident in the apparent design of nature. Darwin's discovery of natural selection explained the complexities of the adaptive qualities evident in nature without the need to postulate an Omnipotent being. This became the more persuasive alternative. Post Darwin, the revised Argument from Design claims that; although Darwin probably gave a correct account for the process of evolution, it is not an ultimate one: The ultimate explanation and simplest hypothesis is that the process was masterminded by a designer God. William Paley (1743-1805) believed that human and animal bodies were like extremely complicated machines and such beautiful organisation could not be produced by chance. He famously coined the analogy of a watchmaker to demonstrate this argument: ".....every indication of contrivance, every manifestation of design which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature; with the difference on the side of nature, of being greater and more, and that in a degree which exceeds all computation." ...read more.

Middle

Anthony Kenny asserts that Darwin may be correct that the natural system is mechanistic in structure, but it can still operate teleologically: "The argument was only that the ultimate explanation of such adaptation be found in intelligence; and if the argument was correct, then any Darwinian success merely inserts an extra step between the phenomena and their ultimate explanation ". (Destiny, Purpose and Faith, p.72) For an ultimate explanation, there must be an account as to why and how the laws of evolution occurred in the first place. Dawkins assumes that we must just accept that they came about by some fortuitous coincidence. Most advocates of the Argument from Design do not dispute that Darwin was correct about natural selection, only that it cannot be assumed that there is not a Higher Intelligence responsible for guiding the evolutionary process. And furthermore, can use modern scientific research to support this. Physicist and theist, Russell Stannard puts forward the reviewed argument; in order for evolution to happen the characteristics of the physical world and the conditions under which they met were of such remarkable precision that it is practically impossible to believe they were subject to chance and not controlled by a Mind or Designer. ...read more.

Conclusion

God is the only unknown quantity in the theists' argument as oppose to the infinite unknowns in the infinite universes theory. But God is an entirely unknown entity, immune to empirical investigation, whereas the universe is physical in nature so at least, in principle, can be studied. Although for theists' like Stannard and Swinbourne God is not an unknown. The believer feels validation of God's existence in their everyday human experience. To ask someone of religious persuasion to accept that this God was ultimately responsible for fine tuning the universe is not asking them to accept anything new and is surely the ultimate and the only explanation which they seek.. For atheists like Dawkins though, there is no sufficient reason to postulate a designer God to explain the existence of the universe. However, Dawkins is also unsuccessful in concluding that Darwin completely undermined the Argument from Design. In light of Darwin's discoveries, Paley was wrong to assume that the existence of a designer God could be inferred from the apparent purpose serving order of the natural world. Yet, evolution theory fails to account for the mysterious series of coincidences under which the fabrics of the universe were formed. Neo-Darwinians have not provided enough evidence to disprove that a Higher Intelligence was ultimately responsible. Therefore Darwin's theory of evolution does not completely undermine the Argument from Design. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    puts it all down to random mistakes in the DNA molecules of any life form. Many people agreed with, or supported Darwin, but many were outraged as it compromised the teachings of the Bible, and in a time when the public were predominantly Catholic, this was not the best idea.

  2. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    If gravity were too big than the planets would be pulled towards the sun. If gravity were too small then the planets would be pushed away from the sun.

  1. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    If the universe is eternal by the law of probability order will eventually develop without the need for a designer. The process of development and evolving objects is very much at the centre of the idea of evolution through natural selection.

  2. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    In conclusion, I have discovered the design argument is built up of many points and has been varied several times, however, each of the variations seem very similar - and all come down to the same one point: that the universe is so very complex that there must have been

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    What are the problems with the design argument? The design argument has received a lot of criticism from philosophers over the years, which has devalued its philosophical worth. Hume is a major opponent of the design argument has argued that humans do not have the sufficient knowledge and experience of creation to conclude there was only one designer.

  2. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    Christians maintain that God is the most perfect possible being. Ockham's claim is that the most that the Cosmological argument can establish is the most perfect being that actually exists, and there is no way of moving from this to showing that God is the most perfect possible being.

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    world must be like the creator of a machine only far greater. Hume's criticisms aim to destroy the argument of Cleanthes by mockery. Philo then replies with two arguments: Philo's First Argument Like effects imply like causes - so we end of with a caricature of God, a God who

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    To see this, note that the right side of the above (simplified) equation represents the density of matter multiplied by 4*pi. If there is matter present in the universe, then the matter density of the universe is positive . This implies that the right side of the equation, 4*pi*(density of matter), will be positive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work