• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of his main criticisms using the 6 headings:

Extracts from this document...


18-01-2001. R.S. Mr Mort. Viki Nixon DFW13 David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of his main criticisms using the 6 headings: An unsound analogy Analogy is the 'logic leap' that William Paley argued was the reason for the existence of the Universe. From his watch theory, he discovered it must need a designer, and therefore something as complicated as the universe must need a designer, therefore it is God. However, Hume did not believe in God, and said Paley's analogy was weak. Hume says it could have all happened by chance. Hume said our world is not like the watch, since it holds so many different things, such as plants and animals. It is more organic than mechanical. If we see a watch we straight away know that it has taken one or more people to design it and mechanically put it together, but the universe is so much more complex, it will have needed more designers than the watch, and therefore destroying the idea of one God being the designer of the universe. ...read more.


he was not able to change the world now it has evil, or, - God is non-moral, and he may be all good and all powerful, but he does not want to change the world from what it is now. Other explanations for apparent order * Explain the Anthropic Argument.* The Anthropic argument is one of the various types of design argument thought up by Swinburne. This involves analogy. It argues that nature provides for the needs of intelligent beings. This intelligence - God. Swinburne uses the argument of probability. He asks which is the most probable reason for the order of the universe, by random chance or the work of a designer? He believes God is the simplest answer. The Anthropic argument argues that nature seems to plan in advance for the needs of animals and humans. It suggests mind or intelligence. Like the argument about analogy, it lends itself more to an inductive formulation than to a deductive one. This argued that given the findings of science, the most reasonable explanation for the character of the universe is God. ...read more.


William Paley: answers the criticisms that Hume had made of the design argument. He uses the analogy of the watch, suggest you come across a watch, you see it clearly that it did not happen by chance. The result must be of an intelligent mind, such as the universe. Paley is trying to prove god to be the designer. His aim is making things clearer to those who believe in God already. The argument to design is also referred to as the Anthropic argument (see above). Hume's criticisms are the main sector of this form of argument. The unsound analogy, God being non-moral, similar effects do not necessarily imply similar causes, etc. Further arguments against the argument include: * Darwinism, with its appeal for explanation, put pressure on the teleological argument. * Beginning with 'this world' and concludes with concepts that we have no experience, e.g. uncaused etc. * Whether statements of the argument are meaningful. * Arguments that there is no need to think of things in the universe operating in the light of any kind of purpose. * We have no reason to believe that the universe will continue to behave in an orderly way. ( * = left or unfinished because unsure of correct argument.) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    I don't agree that if God loved humanity we wouldn't have to suffer. Firstly I think that God is all powerful and all knowledgeable so know one can ever understand him, this is why we cannot know why he does the things he does, we just have to accept them.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Owen and Cardinal Newman are just two of the philosophers who have argued that morality stems from God either through our conscience or an objective set of rules he has built into us. The former is argued by Owen, who argues that the existence of objective moral laws seems to

  1. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    William Paley's work shows that he believes that there was a design to the universe and this designer was God. Many religions will agree with his theory such as Islam, Christianity and Judaism. In the religious Holy Scriptures such as the Holy Quran, the Bible and the Torah there

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    Another criticism Hume had is that we have evidence of natural evil in the world for example earthquakes and disease, so therefore God could not be such a good designer. Workman has to be judged in proportion to the quality of the work the produce.

  1. Explain the use of analogy in the Design argument. Evaluate with particular reference to ...

    He concluded that things in the universe must be directed towards their end by an intelligent being, God. Aquinas used the analogy of an archer and an arrow, the archer guides the arrow to its end, in the same way God guides nature to its end.

  2. What place is there for the Design Argument in the 21st Century?

    Another philosopher who supported the Teleological Argument was Richard Swinburne. He applied the modified versions of the Design Argument and attempts to illustrate that theism makes better sense of all evidence that are available than any alternative. He was not particularly bothered about spatial order, for example, fish in the sea and bees in the air.

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    You could not possibly see anything else for you would not be here to see anything at all if any other card had been draw.' Swinburne believes that the victim reasoning is correct. He says, 'There is something extraordinary about ten hearts being drawn - the fact that this is

  2. Outline and Critically Evaluate the design Argument

    Natural instinct, resulting in survival and Newton's law of motion were also viewed to aid Paley's beliefs. Perhaps the most famous argument of design, I feel this story shows a broad understanding of the question in mind and portrays a simple, understandable prospect of the Design argument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work