• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of his main criticisms using the 6 headings:

Extracts from this document...


18-01-2001. R.S. Mr Mort. Viki Nixon DFW13 David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of his main criticisms using the 6 headings: An unsound analogy Analogy is the 'logic leap' that William Paley argued was the reason for the existence of the Universe. From his watch theory, he discovered it must need a designer, and therefore something as complicated as the universe must need a designer, therefore it is God. However, Hume did not believe in God, and said Paley's analogy was weak. Hume says it could have all happened by chance. Hume said our world is not like the watch, since it holds so many different things, such as plants and animals. It is more organic than mechanical. If we see a watch we straight away know that it has taken one or more people to design it and mechanically put it together, but the universe is so much more complex, it will have needed more designers than the watch, and therefore destroying the idea of one God being the designer of the universe. ...read more.


he was not able to change the world now it has evil, or, - God is non-moral, and he may be all good and all powerful, but he does not want to change the world from what it is now. Other explanations for apparent order * Explain the Anthropic Argument.* The Anthropic argument is one of the various types of design argument thought up by Swinburne. This involves analogy. It argues that nature provides for the needs of intelligent beings. This intelligence - God. Swinburne uses the argument of probability. He asks which is the most probable reason for the order of the universe, by random chance or the work of a designer? He believes God is the simplest answer. The Anthropic argument argues that nature seems to plan in advance for the needs of animals and humans. It suggests mind or intelligence. Like the argument about analogy, it lends itself more to an inductive formulation than to a deductive one. This argued that given the findings of science, the most reasonable explanation for the character of the universe is God. ...read more.


William Paley: answers the criticisms that Hume had made of the design argument. He uses the analogy of the watch, suggest you come across a watch, you see it clearly that it did not happen by chance. The result must be of an intelligent mind, such as the universe. Paley is trying to prove god to be the designer. His aim is making things clearer to those who believe in God already. The argument to design is also referred to as the Anthropic argument (see above). Hume's criticisms are the main sector of this form of argument. The unsound analogy, God being non-moral, similar effects do not necessarily imply similar causes, etc. Further arguments against the argument include: * Darwinism, with its appeal for explanation, put pressure on the teleological argument. * Beginning with 'this world' and concludes with concepts that we have no experience, e.g. uncaused etc. * Whether statements of the argument are meaningful. * Arguments that there is no need to think of things in the universe operating in the light of any kind of purpose. * We have no reason to believe that the universe will continue to behave in an orderly way. ( * = left or unfinished because unsure of correct argument.) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    Swinburne says, 'If there were many deities we would see to marks of different deities throughout the Universe rather than the uniformity we see today which suggest one God.' Hume in reply says, 'This is a weak argument because if many people co-operate in the building of a ship, you would not expect to see many designs.'

  2. Good and Evil

    Most people together with Christians would like to know if God has a purpose for suffering. Christians straight away would look towards Jesus to find the answer, they knew that he suffered on the cross, the Bible says "For to this you were called, because Christ also suffered for us,

  1. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    In the Holy Quran there are many verses which state that there is only one God and that he is the creator and Lord of everything that exists. Muslims believe in 'Thauhid' which believes that there is only one God who has no partners.

  2. Outline and Critically Evaluate the design Argument

    Immoral and evil is not the view commonly taken on board when thinking of such a being, but can be considered when deciding the success of the world in the eyes of a designer. He therefore concludes that there can be no designer or that such a designer has corrupt intentions.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    natural causes and therefore that there is no justification for supposing (P3) applies to events of a different category, to events for which it is logically impossible that there be natural causes. The initial state of the universe by definition has no natural cause and therefore falls outside of the scope of (P3).

  2. The design argument for the existence of God (also called the teleological argument).

    Paley used the example of the eye and the way in adapted for sight. Its various parts co-operate in ways to produce sight. He believed that the eye was for the specific purpose of seeing, and that this design suggests an intelligent designer.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Lebiniz accepted the cosmological argument because he believed that it had 'sufficient reason' for the universe to exist and that God was the first cause upon which everything depends. However he did not accept the universe was uncaused, rejecting an infinite universe because it did not have a satisfactory explanation.

  2. Explain the use of analogy in the Design argument. Evaluate with particular reference to ...

    Thomas Aquinas argued for design qua regularity in the fifth of his five ways, 'from the governance of things'. He argued natural things lack knowledge but act regularly towards and end or goal, for example the seasons, and this therefore must be a product of design as it can not happen by chance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work