• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of his main criticisms using the 6 headings:

Extracts from this document...


18-01-2001. R.S. Mr Mort. Viki Nixon DFW13 David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of his main criticisms using the 6 headings: An unsound analogy Analogy is the 'logic leap' that William Paley argued was the reason for the existence of the Universe. From his watch theory, he discovered it must need a designer, and therefore something as complicated as the universe must need a designer, therefore it is God. However, Hume did not believe in God, and said Paley's analogy was weak. Hume says it could have all happened by chance. Hume said our world is not like the watch, since it holds so many different things, such as plants and animals. It is more organic than mechanical. If we see a watch we straight away know that it has taken one or more people to design it and mechanically put it together, but the universe is so much more complex, it will have needed more designers than the watch, and therefore destroying the idea of one God being the designer of the universe. ...read more.


he was not able to change the world now it has evil, or, - God is non-moral, and he may be all good and all powerful, but he does not want to change the world from what it is now. Other explanations for apparent order * Explain the Anthropic Argument.* The Anthropic argument is one of the various types of design argument thought up by Swinburne. This involves analogy. It argues that nature provides for the needs of intelligent beings. This intelligence - God. Swinburne uses the argument of probability. He asks which is the most probable reason for the order of the universe, by random chance or the work of a designer? He believes God is the simplest answer. The Anthropic argument argues that nature seems to plan in advance for the needs of animals and humans. It suggests mind or intelligence. Like the argument about analogy, it lends itself more to an inductive formulation than to a deductive one. This argued that given the findings of science, the most reasonable explanation for the character of the universe is God. ...read more.


William Paley: answers the criticisms that Hume had made of the design argument. He uses the analogy of the watch, suggest you come across a watch, you see it clearly that it did not happen by chance. The result must be of an intelligent mind, such as the universe. Paley is trying to prove god to be the designer. His aim is making things clearer to those who believe in God already. The argument to design is also referred to as the Anthropic argument (see above). Hume's criticisms are the main sector of this form of argument. The unsound analogy, God being non-moral, similar effects do not necessarily imply similar causes, etc. Further arguments against the argument include: * Darwinism, with its appeal for explanation, put pressure on the teleological argument. * Beginning with 'this world' and concludes with concepts that we have no experience, e.g. uncaused etc. * Whether statements of the argument are meaningful. * Arguments that there is no need to think of things in the universe operating in the light of any kind of purpose. * We have no reason to believe that the universe will continue to behave in an orderly way. ( * = left or unfinished because unsure of correct argument.) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps" (1 Peter 2:21), Christians would abide by this, so they would tolerate the suffering, believing that it was supposed to happen to them because it happen to Christ. Christians would also take the pain of suffering and understand why a

  2. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    In the Holy Quran there are many verses which state that there is only one God and that he is the creator and Lord of everything that exists. Muslims believe in 'Thauhid' which believes that there is only one God who has no partners.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    designer because of the way that the world sits together for a purpose, for example the intricate mechanisms of the body such as the eye, in which parts adapted to enable the eye to complete its purpose of sight. The complex arrangement suggests a designer, which Paley believes is God.

  2. What place is there for the Design Argument in the 21st Century?

    When people say that there is excessive suffering in the world to justify an all powerful and loving God. Swinburne replied to those people by saying that they wanted an unrealistic world where nothing matters. To achieve the highest virtues then pain and suffering is a part of it.

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    Any slight variation in any of the mathematical laws of the universe would create chaos.' Therefore, this means that the fact that the world is designed means there is a designer - God. Today, modern science is also been able to produce evidence in support of the teleological argument.

  2. Outline and Critically Evaluate the design Argument

    Natural instinct, resulting in survival and Newton's law of motion were also viewed to aid Paley's beliefs. Perhaps the most famous argument of design, I feel this story shows a broad understanding of the question in mind and portrays a simple, understandable prospect of the Design argument.


    People are conscious of an absolute moral law 3. People acknowledge the demands that this law makes on them even if they break it 4. No finite mind grasps the whole of what this represents 5. Ideas exist only in minds 6. Therefore there must be a supreme mind, beyond all finite minds, in which this absolute moral law exists.

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    � The first argument maintains that the closer the analogy between design within the world and design of the universe as a whole, the more the picture emerges of a God who is dissimilar to the God of Classical Theism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work