Glick

Death Penalty

Capital Punishment is defined as “putting a condemned person to death” (Gillian 56).  It is easy to understand that many people would be divided on this issue.  When dealing with a person’s life, it quickly becomes the issue of many.  Some do not understand, how it is possible to take the criminal’s life, when that is exactly what he did.  Is this not showing him that it was okay to take another’s life, if it is justifiable?  The answer however, is no.  By taking the criminals life, the government is simply fitting the punishment to the crime.  Others would argue that these people’s rights of the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness are being revoked.  However, even if it is granted that capital punishment violates our duty to treat people with dignity, humanity, and love, that alone may not be a sufficient reason for abolishing the practice.  Dignity, humanity and love are foundational moral goods and as such are prima facia in nature. That is, they are each morally binding on face value until a stronger duty emerges with which it conflicts, thereby creating a moral dilemma. For, even though the people are duty bound to acknowledge a criminal's dignity, the duty of retribution is also present and it in fact outweighs the other duties.  In essence the death penalty is a complicated moral issue that can be debated forever, however it must be seen that this punishment is by no means cruel and unusual and needs to continuously be used in the United States.

Join now!

Philosopher John Locke justifies the death penalty in his Second Treatise of Government by saying, “Each transgression may be punished to that degree, and with so much severity, as will suffice to make it an ill bargain to the offender, give him cause to repent, and terrify others from doing the like.”  Many people agree with Locke in his beliefs that the death penalty is a justifiable punishment for protection of the union as well as to prevent murderers from harming the community again.  However others do not seem to agree with Locke that defense of personal property should be ...

This is a preview of the whole essay