• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe Aristotle's teaching about the difference between the final cause and other sorts of cause.

Extracts from this document...


Describe Aristotle's teaching about the difference between the final cause and other sorts of cause. Aristotle believed that all things possess souls. For Aristotle, "soul" labels the distinctive capacities that a thing possesses for example an acorn possesses the capacity to grow into an oak tree. Certain things have certain potentials, these are not interchangeable. Possessing a soul means that a thing has within itself the potential to change. Although an acorn relies on certain external factors such as sunlight, rain etc, to become an oak tree, it carries within itself the capacity to become an oak tree. It is created with this capacity; it does not develop it over time. This is why natural things are better than artificial things. A lump of marble can only become a statue if it is sculpted, whereas an acorn will become an oak tree of its own accord. ...read more.


Aristotle stresses the fact that, although they do not consciously strive to fulfil their potential, the heavenly bodies are eternal and have an innate tendency for unending circular motion, and ensuring a basis for the rest of the hierarchy to exist on. Highest of all is God. God does not represent anything, but rather God is perfect form. He is actuality rather than potentiality. God depends on nothing else for his existence, but is completely self-sufficient and, on the contrary, everything else depends on him to exist. These links between God and everything else are crucial when Aristotle begins to talk about "causation". He claimed that God is the final cause of the universe. He has fulfilled his potential and there is no further advancement that he can undergo. ...read more.


The final cause in the case of the example would be the statue itself, because it is what the sculptor aimed to create from the start. The final statue fulfils the sculptors' intention. Aristotle was not particularly interested in the causes of statues and other inanimate objects. He applied his theory of causation to living things and, most importantly, to the universe. The final cause of the universe is God, so in taking this view, God is the final cause of everything exists. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Aristotle's views on causality. Aristotle's views on causation have many strengths. Firstly it gives a plausible explanation to why things exist but it steers clear of the theory that the universe was created by God in its entirety. It gives us an idea of why we exist and what we need to do to fulfil our own potential. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'.

    Movement in the world must be undying. However there must be some reason why there is movement at all. If not an efficient cause, this reason must be a final cause.

  2. Outline the teaching about the Kingdom of God in the Parable's of Mark's Gospel.

    They may believe this earth could never be God's Kingdom if there's people like them living in such conditions. They are very pessimistic people and only see the worst side of people. They also think about all the bad, horrendous things that are happening in the world: people being murdered, cancer taking lives, drugs, violence, wars, etc.

  1. Explain what Aristotle meant by the 'final cause'.

    Aristotle used the word 'substance' in many different ways, making it one of his most difficult concepts, but one of the ways in which he used it to express the material of which things were made. Aristotle also used the word 'matter' to mean the stuff of which something was made.

  2. Aristotle believed that everything has a cause. He saw four different explanations for ...

    Aristotle believed that the Prime Mover was The Final cause. There is a problem with calling this final cause 'God' as how can 'God' be the Efficient cause of movement because the act of moving required a change in the mover.

  1. Outline the teaching about the kingdom of god in the parables of Marks gospel.

    Another reason for not believing in the kingdom is that when Jesus was here he performed miracles. This is shown in marks gospel when Jesus heals a paralysed man, Jesus said ' I tell you, get up, pick up your mat, and go home!'

  2. The First Cause

    It is not, therefore, the First Cause. If 'A' is the first cause, then 'B' must also be the first cause of 'C', and 'C' the first cause of 'D', and so on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work