• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the major differences which may exist between a scientific and religious account of the origins of the universe There are two different types

Extracts from this document...


AMDG Jordan Gray Describe the major differences which may exist between a scientific and religious account of the origins of the universe There are two different types of arguments which revolve around how the universe began and of its origins. The scientific account of this is "The Big Bang" theory which states that the universe originated from the supernova (death) of a star and all the tiny particles fused together. The religious classification of this is how "God created the world in six days, on the seventh he rested". Both sides tell us that the opposing argument is utter nonsense and to believe `their` account. These two contradictory proclamations have both been around for hundreds of years and I will explain the major differences between them throughout this essay. Science teaches us many things which challenge the argument of the scientific account. ...read more.


Is basically the argument of science, and it is backed up furthermore with facts and proof; "When the star exploded..." This makes the argument very compelling and believable because when people find out about this view of the origin of the universe they will look for facts to back up what they have been told, the religious view can't offer any proof or facts. Religion on the other hand disputes in contradiction with the view of science and believes that the universe was created by the one and only God, not by particles and atoms fusing and performing the, once believed to be, impossible. For thousands of years before people knew about physical cosmology they accepted that the world was "created in six days". Although no proof at all was proposed they believed this account as there was no alternative and. ...read more.


Now, to me this seems too perfect and it undermines the argument of religion, weakening it and deeming it to be artificial. No evidence is given to back up each of its claims it is all about what happened and nothing about how or why it happened which surplus is shown in the argument of science. However, Genesis (the creation of the world) tells us literally of this view but maybe it is not to be taken literally, but metaphorically. In this case it is much easier and much more practical to believe, we can understand the relationship between God and the universe and how we as people were created. This brings me to conclude that in my opinion science is to a large extent the greater explanation of the origins of the universe because it states a realistic claim, and backs it up with proof and evidence. Religion however, does not. It states a claim of an impractical and idealistic manor and has no proof or evidence to back these claims up. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    The stranger tells the fighter that he is on the resistance's side, even in command of it, and he begs the fighter to have faith in im no matter what happens.

  2. How Does Achebe Show Two Different Cultures In 'Things Fall Apart'?

    Achebe talks about Umuofia's most revered deity, the earth goddess. The earth goddess Ani is a contradiction to a vast amount of Ibo beliefs, simply because of the fact that she is female. This is also a great contradiction to Okonkwo's obsession with masculinity, he has to worship a female, and he considers females to be below males.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    If the world were a paradise, humans would not be free because every human action would result in happiness and the same outcome. Everyone would have follow Gods rules because there would be no difficulties in doing so. Qualities such as honour, courage and love would all be impossible.

  2. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    This hole being the inevitable result of the expulsion of CFC's. Confucianism promotes an ethic of proportionality, as it is said in The Works of Mencius: "If the axes and bills enter the hills and forests only at the proper time, the wood will be more than can be used."[12]

  1. Individual religious experience means individual religious fantasy; corporate religious experience means corporate religious fantasy; ...

    There are different explanations for the origin and nature of religious experiences. What they have in common is the rejection of a supernatural source or object and the attempt to offer a full explanation in empirically verifiable terms. Several theoreticians, including Sigmund Freud, have offered psychological explanations.

  2. Does God exist and if so where is He - where can He be ...

    Such a worldview does not allow for spiritual beings or anything miraculous. Into this category go naturalists, secular humanists, agnostics, atheists, and many evolutionists. Yet I am convinced there is something else in the worldview of many "closed universe" proponents that leaves no room for a personal God.

  1. Explain why religious people may have problems with transplant surgery.

    The scarcity of organs also causes them to be of great value which causes poor people in developing countries to trade in organs, for money to survive, to rich people in developed countries. There are many disagreements amongst Christians when it comes to transplant surgery.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    I conclude that Swinburne has given us no reason to believe that it is impossible for there to be a big bang singularity that occupies less than three spatial dimensions. Given that Swinburne's argument fails, and that no other arguments against the coherency of the big bang singularity have been

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work