• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the arguments for and against the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the arguments for and against the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder. The death penalty was abolished in the United Kingdom in 1965. (Blackwell 1968.) The abolishment of the death penalty was not a simple case. Since 1957 the issue had been before the House of Commons more than 19 times. However the death penalty is still used today in many countries across the world. During the year 2000 at least 3,058 people were sentenced to death in 65 different countries. (www.amnesty.org 2001.) This essay will discuss arguments for and against the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder. One of the most straight forward arguments for the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder, is that once an offender has been executed they are obviously unable to kill again. (Hudson 1996.) A study by Bendall found that in the 17 years before the death penalty was abolished eleven police officers were murdered. He then studied the 17 years after the death penalty was abolished and found that twenty-seven police officers were murdered, which is more than double the figure than before. Therefore this is evidence that the abolition of the death penalty resulted in an increase in the rate of murders. (Sorell 1987.) In May 1982 there was a debate on the clauses in the Criminal Justice Bill in the British House of Commons. ...read more.


wrote If everyone including offenders has a right to life, then capital punishment is obviously a violation of this human rights, however wider it may be held as the only commensurate punishment for some crimes, or how effective it may be as a deterrent. Another human rights issue is the long periods of time that is spent waiting on death row. The average time spent on death row is 9 years. The psychological effects have been studied and it has been concluded that spending a long time on death row can be harmful to a prisoner. (Coke & Martin 1958.) The deterrence effect of the death penalty is not a simple case. There has been substantial evidence for and against it. Bandura (1986) stated that "the issue is not whether the threat of punishment by death can deter homicide , but whether the death penalty deters homicide more effectively than imprisonment." (Feldman, 1993: 350) He concluded that the abolishment of the death penalty has not affected the crime rate, and therefore did not have a deterrent effect. (Feldman, 1993.) In the 1982 House of Commons debate it was pointed out that murder by shooting should not by punished by the death penalty on the grounds that "guns were often used by the mentally unstable or by the sane in moments of high passion." ...read more.


(Duke University, 1993.) The state of Georgia is going broke because of prosecuting death penalty cases. Each case costs the state $300,000 which could be spent on other causes such as emergency services, salaries and road equipment etc. (www.deathpenaltyinfo.org, 1997) As we can see there are many arguments for and against the reintroduction of the death penalty. It is not as simple as many people may first think. There are many conflicting views. For example the in the bible Moses states "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." (Hagan, Gillis & Brownfield 1996.) However also in the bible the Ten Commandments spoken to God by Moses says "Thou shalt not kill." The death penalty in the United Kingdom is now seen by many as being old fashioned and out of date. Hudson (1996: 91.) wrote: The move from torture, mutilation and death to imprisonment and fines, are not so much progress in humanitarianism, as progress in bureaucratized rationalism, necessary to meet the social control needs and legitimacy conditions of modern society. In modern society the arguments against the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder tend to outweigh the arguments for. It is highly unlikely that the death penalty will be reintroduced in the United Kingdom again because of the UK being part of the European Convention of Human Rights. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    Philodemus suggests that "Desires depend on us"12 and on our belief. He suggests that because the paranoid man thinks of the judgement and punishments after death, it affects his decisions in his life and thus affects his happiness. Rather than enjoying his life he dwells in his sorrow that it

  2. Outline the arguments for and against life after death? Assess the significance of the ...

    This view is a tradition of Christianity, Islam and Judaism as well as other religions. Christians take the resurrection of Jesus Christ on Easter morning as support for this view. However, the reliability of the biblical evidence can be questioned.

  1. The death penalty

    A child means every human being below the age of eighteen years; (as stated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child).

  2. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    35 out of the 50 states have the death penalty, which all have different capital crimes that lead to the death penalty. Most of the capital crimes involve murder of some kind. Other capital crimes include treason (California), capital drug trafficking (Florida), aircraft hijacking (Georgia)

  1. Capital Punishment: The Effects of the Death Penalty

    This act of their conscience often justifies the old saying of "an eye for an eye." Having vindictive criminals sentenced to death often relive the public of the worries of repeat offenders. Taking into consideration retribution and deterrence, capital punishment is generally the surest way to ensure that a criminal

  2. Death Penalty - Should it be abolished?

    If a criminal performs a premediated heinous murder, he should be put to death? And many murders are premediated. Repeated offences and people who enjoy committing crimes do not deserve to walk our streets. I feel that we should all send a message to all the killers, that taking the life of another human is wrong.

  1. Should the UK reintroduce the death penalty?

    If murders, rapist and abusers are killed we are making society a safer place and people can feel safe. Even though the top 13 states with the highest murder rate have the death penalty maybe the reason they had to introduce the death penalty was because murder rates were already

  2. Justice demands the death penalty for serious crimes. Discuss

    The loss of freedom cannot be compared to the loss of a life. This is not justice. If the punishment for theft is imprisonment, the punishment for murder needs to be something more sever as human life is more valuable than any material item.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work