• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Teleological Arguments

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Teleological Arguments There are many different arguments that stem from the Teleological Argument, which are a special form of the Cosmological Argument. The arguments came into being, when people tried to answer the following questions: 'Why is the Universe as it is?' and secondly, 'Why is the Universe ordered, regular and beautiful?' These arguments reject the fact that the Universe was created by chance, as it is too improbable to be reasonable. The two main arguments that I will be looking at in this essay were established by William Paley and David Hume. Hume, the earlier of the two philosophers, criticised arguments looking at the nature around us and using that as proof for the existence of God (such as Paley's theories). He does this in 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion'. He uses different character to represent different things, as a literary device, to put across his points of view. ...read more.

Middle

He does not believe that the assumption from order to design can be made and thinks that it is easily plausible that the universe did occur by chance. As an example, to back up his point, he tells us that animals are not designed as, according to Darwin, they shape themselves into their own environment. Hume beleivs, and allows us to believe through Philo, that we cannot judge whether the Universe has a designer as ther is no substantial evidence supporting one side or another. William Paley, twenty two years after Hume, tells us his argument via analogy. He explains to us his argument by asking us to compare the watch and the world. If somebody did not know what a watch was, there would be evidence that there had been intelligent design for it to have been created and therefore, an intelligent designer would have been at play. ...read more.

Conclusion

The last of the Teleological Arguments was supported by Paul Rout who was a modern Franciscan thinker. This argument is called the Argument from Beauty. Beauty and human appreciation of beauty has no survival value other than attraction of the sexes. It is though, therefore, to have been created by God as a 'pointer' to lead us to Him. Rout says that ' We [as humans] are not involved in an intellectual exercise; it is more that we are drawn beyond ourselves and our rational concepts by what is desirable.' Overall, I think that these arguments can point to the God of 'Process theology' rather than to a traditional monotheistic God. However, there is no proof for this and I do not think people will be able to prove what they have experienced in the life time of the human race. These arguments all rest on probability and individual judgement and therefore cannot be said to perform the function of 'proofs'. 1 Josh Bradshaw ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    omnipotent because he cannot handle everything that happens in the world because he needed something to rely on in the occurrence of evil. Again proves that he knew there was going to be evil and suffering in the world. 'God did not make a perfect world and that evil has

  2. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    This hole being the inevitable result of the expulsion of CFC's. Confucianism promotes an ethic of proportionality, as it is said in The Works of Mencius: "If the axes and bills enter the hills and forests only at the proper time, the wood will be more than can be used."[12]

  1. Outline the key strengths and weaknesses of the teleological argument.

    The argument can be divided in to two parts: design as relating to regularity, and design relating to purpose. The above example is the latter - the watch has a purpose and the rock does not. Therefore, it is plausible to believe someone created the watch for that purpose.

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    for all of time for everything else to continue in a chain of causation that lends itself better to the belief that God, as the first cause, is acting on the world here and now. Like dominoes there has to be something there for the series of dominoes to start;

  1. What are the main strengths and weaknesses of teleological argument for the existence of ...

    Therefore without god we would not have heaven or earth. The concept of cause and effect means that one cannot have the effect without the efficient cause. This brings another item into being or causes something to change. The idea is that there can't simply be a continuous weakening of

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    be described as a natural evil and the Holocaust killed 6 million, is a result of a moral evil. The suffering involved can be long-lasting and can not only be physical but also can be mental anguish and depression, for example the participants in the world wars never recovered from their ordeals.

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    A.E Taylor states 'nature reveals an anticipatory design that chance evolution cannot account for. For example, the body's need for the oxygen and the bodily membranes it anticipate us inhaling oxygen.' He also describes how insects deposit their eggs in a place where the newly born will be able to find food relatively easily.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The singularity is a violent, terrifying caldron of lawlessness. As Paul Davies notes, 'anything can come out of a naked singularity-in the case of the big bang the universe came out. Its creation represents the instantaneous suspension of physical laws, the sudden, abrupt flash of lawlessness that allowed something to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work