• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Teleological Arguments

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Teleological Arguments There are many different arguments that stem from the Teleological Argument, which are a special form of the Cosmological Argument. The arguments came into being, when people tried to answer the following questions: 'Why is the Universe as it is?' and secondly, 'Why is the Universe ordered, regular and beautiful?' These arguments reject the fact that the Universe was created by chance, as it is too improbable to be reasonable. The two main arguments that I will be looking at in this essay were established by William Paley and David Hume. Hume, the earlier of the two philosophers, criticised arguments looking at the nature around us and using that as proof for the existence of God (such as Paley's theories). He does this in 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion'. He uses different character to represent different things, as a literary device, to put across his points of view. ...read more.

Middle

He does not believe that the assumption from order to design can be made and thinks that it is easily plausible that the universe did occur by chance. As an example, to back up his point, he tells us that animals are not designed as, according to Darwin, they shape themselves into their own environment. Hume beleivs, and allows us to believe through Philo, that we cannot judge whether the Universe has a designer as ther is no substantial evidence supporting one side or another. William Paley, twenty two years after Hume, tells us his argument via analogy. He explains to us his argument by asking us to compare the watch and the world. If somebody did not know what a watch was, there would be evidence that there had been intelligent design for it to have been created and therefore, an intelligent designer would have been at play. ...read more.

Conclusion

The last of the Teleological Arguments was supported by Paul Rout who was a modern Franciscan thinker. This argument is called the Argument from Beauty. Beauty and human appreciation of beauty has no survival value other than attraction of the sexes. It is though, therefore, to have been created by God as a 'pointer' to lead us to Him. Rout says that ' We [as humans] are not involved in an intellectual exercise; it is more that we are drawn beyond ourselves and our rational concepts by what is desirable.' Overall, I think that these arguments can point to the God of 'Process theology' rather than to a traditional monotheistic God. However, there is no proof for this and I do not think people will be able to prove what they have experienced in the life time of the human race. These arguments all rest on probability and individual judgement and therefore cannot be said to perform the function of 'proofs'. 1 Josh Bradshaw ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    What are Freud's main views on religion and its relation to psychology? The majority of arguments rely upon the premise that God can be proved through logical or empirical means. The psychological view of religion is very different, and that the God worshipped by believers is a construct of the human mind.

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    If God exists but does not have a cause of his existence then if God is thought to have a cause for existence that this is false, in which case the cosmological argument is unsound. If God is thought to have a cuase than this is false, i.e.

  1. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    Could Vardy be arguing that to appreciate God one has to have a certain degree of ignorance?

  2. Free essay

    1.) Outline and explain the main points of teleological arguments for the existence of ...

    How then can you imagine that the universe as a whole is devoid of purpose and intelligence, when it embraces everything, including these artefacts themselves and their artificers?" The most notable scholastics (circa 1100-1500 CE) who put forth teleological arguments were Averroes (Ibn-Rushd) (1126-1198) and Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274).

  1. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    Loss of order in the world, caused by 'Moral Chaos', lead to 'Natural Evil'. It was like a domino effect, evil after evil after evil happened. First it started off from being made by humans and angels, now evil had become almost a natural thing to happen.

  2. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    are preventing others from reaching their end, which is good in and of itself. In the 13th century, when Aquinas developed Aristotle's theory, he added that a things natural purpose is that which was assigned to them by God, adding a religious aspect to the theory.

  1. What are the main strengths and weaknesses of teleological argument for the existence of ...

    This was an extension by Aquinas of Aristotle's theory. Aristotle believed that the solar system worked and the reason why we have seasons and night and day was because there was an unmoved mover who kept things in order and kept things going.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    If somebody says, 'it does not matter to God whether the universe he creates is animate or inanimate,' this person is operating with a concept of God that is at odds with classical theism. I think it would be granted by virtually all contemporary theists in the analytic tradition (M.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work