• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the suggestion that the more science discovers about the universe the stronger the teological argument becomes.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the suggestion that the more science discovers about the universe the stronger the teological argument becomes. Science does give us more and more information about the universe, but it doesn't believe in God or god as the designer of the universe as there is no scientific evidence for the existent of God. But learning more about the universe does show us that there is an order in the universe, which strengthens the teological argument. The Design argument is a theory based on the idea that everything in the Universe is ordered. It is also known as the Teological argument, derived from the Greek word "telos" meaning "end" or "purpose." The basic and fundamental proposal of the design argument is that because of the apparent order that is present in the Universe and on earth, we must conclude that there is an element of design involved. To design something, it is logical to think that there must be a designer. This designer is God. The idea of God being the designer of the universe in this teological argument is something that hasn't been scientifically proven therefore science disagrees with the idea. The design argument is spilt into two parts; design qua regularity and design qua purpose. ...read more.


Therefore man is not simply a product of evolution and natural selection but a specific design. Simply put, he says the fact that the universe is saturated with beauty suggests that it can't just have happened- there must have been a designer- again, God. The Anthropic Principle, again developed by Tennant, is a more scientific method of supporting the design argument. The conditions of chemicals and gasses at the time of creation where in just the right proportions for the development of human life. If these values had been even just a tiny bit different then this would not have been possible. With this in mind we are encouraged to conclude that, with such a minute chance, surely the universe must have been designed. There are weaknesses in the design argument that can be expressed. The basis of the argument "There is order in the universes, the universe has been designed, God has designed the universe" is an a posteriori argument. The universe certainly isn't ordered in the same perfect way as a watch is ordered. This shows Paley's analogy to be flawed. For example how can the world be in a state of perfect order when we have what is called "natural evil" in the world. ...read more.


Some have also cited the argument's strength comes from its relation with religious materials, for example the creation story. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." For believers in God, this confirms and cements their beliefs. In conclusion, the success of the Design Argument rests upon probability and individual judgment. The Design Argument, as illustrated by the various criticisms of it, is by no means conclusive, if it was then everyone would know that God exists. If you believe that the universe is a product of blind chance then the design argument will not be strong enough to change your beliefs. I.e. it won't convince an atheist. However, the idea of the universe just being here, a brute fact, a product of blind chance and nothing more is a personally unsatisfactory one due to the extraordinary nature of the universe and so whist the Design Argument may not conclusively prove the existence of God it suggests that the existence of a Designer, who we know as God, is a more probable likelihood than not. Science shows the design of the universe. Science strengthens the design argument as it shows us more and more information about the universe. Therefore there is even more reason for believing that there was and is a designer who planned and created the universe. But there is no proof that the designer is God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    not characteristic of a loving-God). The arguments cannot prove that the first cause and the designer were one and the same and the first cause may have started matter in motion, which a mental designer then worked on to shape our universe.

  2. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    idea that species could be formed and evolve without the necessity of a God. Indeed natural selection stated that nature is a struggle for survival, where the strong survive and the weak die out. The theory of evolution through natural selection conflicted with Christian dogma on several points: firstly Genesis

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    I conclude that Swinburne has given us no reason to believe that it is impossible for there to be a big bang singularity that occupies less than three spatial dimensions. Given that Swinburne's argument fails, and that no other arguments against the coherency of the big bang singularity have been

  2. Free essay

    God and The Universe

    For example, how violent to make your Big Bang? Everything has to be just right, in order for life to evolve. Somehow our universe manages to satisfy every single condition. The chance of this happening would be virtually zero, yet the universe far from seemingly being hostile to life, has seemingly bent over backwards to accommodate life.

  1. There is evidence of design in the universe - discuss.

    no problems, however natural evil such as earthquakes still occur, therefore can the order of the universe be down to a divine intelligence, because if they were divine, they would be omnibenevolent, and things like this would not happen. David Hume worked out several theories against the analogical teleological argument.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    from eternity have a cause, since that relation implies a priority in time and in a beginning of existence." Russell supported Hume's view and argued that just because humans have mothers does not mean that the universe has a mother.

  1. Man and the Universe

    Figure 1 - Copernican Model of the Universe After Copernicus had challenged the church, not many tried until Galileo Galilei. With the creation of the 32x magnification telescope, Galileo could now make observations on the universe that no one had attempted before.

  2. Examine the claim that one day science will be able to explain everything.

    This means people do not have to wait until they die, or hope for a unique religious experience, they can actually see the evidence, evidence which is available to the masses, with physical proof, unlike the Bible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work