• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss two criticisms of the argument from religious experience. To what extent is the argument successful in spite of these objections?

Extracts from this document...


1. Discuss two criticisms of the argument from religious experience. To what extent is the argument successful in spite of these objections? The use of religious experience to justify cognitive belief in a personal God has caused controversy amongst theists and atheists alike. The argument hinges on the principle of credulity; that is, consistency demands that we should treat apparently veridical religious sensory experiences the same as ordinary sensory experiences unless there are special considerations. This and the principle of testimony thus prove God's existence; if someone tells you that they have had such an experience, it is usually reasonable to believe them. Being non-empirical yet an inductive and a posteriori proof, this argument has attracted a variety of criticisms. One such challenge is the "Naturalistic Objection" which attempts to explain these supposed religious experiences atheistically, be it through psychology or socio-economics. ...read more.


an experience of "x" is genuine if the experience is caused by "x". 2. If there is a God, then S/He as the first cause is the initiator of events. 3. Therefore if there is a God, every experience of God is veridical. 4. Therefore the psychological origin of religious experience is not incompatible with the veridicality of religious experience. This seems an attractive stance, however Franks-Davis disputes God's place in this causal change. As the "first cause" of Aquinas' Cosmological argument, God appears less direct and personal in the chain of events. She simply proposes that one should reapply the "principle of credulity", one should assume that it is veridical unless under special circumstances. This objection does, however, highlight an important aspect of theistic faith. According to Vardy, religious experience should not be the sole reason for belief in God as an epistemological basis could be disproved. ...read more.


This particular rebuttal is modest at best as it hopes to eliminate any variation and subjectivity to its detriment. Hick asserts (with greater success) that although religions have different cultural perspectives, they each have an equally true idea of "the Real". This is in accordance with his idea of the world's "religious ambiguity"; as there is an epistemic distance between God and humans, all interpretations of an event are reasonable until they are eschatologically verified. The crucial difference between the argument from religious experience and others such as the teleological argument for several is that it goes beyond rhetoric; it uses what many theists see as explicit and incontrovertible proof for an interactive and personal God. To the individual who encounters the supernatural, the event serves to enhance their faith. Theists can use them to intellectually justify their beliefs as a part of Swinburne's cumulative case. An argument's worth is ultimately difficult to gauge because it depends whether one rates being able to convert atheists over inspiring organic faith or substantiating one's own beliefs. Religious Experience ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    * If God's non-existence is necessary (could not, not exist), then God's existence is impossible since nothing capable of non-existence can exist. This implies that the Ontological Argument is not going to really hold together, if an argument can be used both ways then it is not really strong enough.

  2. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    The Complexity of Theological Talk Famously Ludwig Wittgenstein argued that the meaning of language has to do with how it is used. The important and influential defences of the 'meaningfulness' of religious language have paid more attention than the LPs to how religious language is actually used.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    designer because of the way that the world sits together for a purpose, for example the intricate mechanisms of the body such as the eye, in which parts adapted to enable the eye to complete its purpose of sight. The complex arrangement suggests a designer, which Paley believes is God.

  2. Corporate religious experiences such as the Toronto blessing tell us nothing about god. Discuss

    experience are indescribable, noetic quality being an insight into unobtainable truths about God, passivity which is losing control to a powerful being like God. Individual experiences can be seen as a believer who comes into contact with God, where they gain awareness of God and claim to have a relationship with God.

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    Instead, he believes that mystical experiences are "if ineffable, ineffable in just the way that many other experiences are."5 Therefore to say that mystical experiences are ineffable is to make a 'trivial claim'. However, similarly to James Gale creates an analogy between aesthetic experiences and mystical experiences though in a different way.

  2. Select two theodicies. Comment on their success or otherwise. (13)

    is beneficial in that it allows us to understand what good is: "how, if we had no knowledge of the contrary, could we have instruction in that which is good?"

  1. Consider Crittically the Arguments against the DesignArgument Deomonstrating the Existence of God and assess ...

    By using a carrot as an analogy it is easy to infer there is no purpose. If David Hume had lived long enough he would have most likely quoted Darwinism as an example, which sees beneficial adaptations explained in non-personal terms by natural selection.

  2. Looking at the views of two different religions about the same topic, 'life after ...

    The body decomposes. At the second coming of the Jesus the body will be resurrected and will be judged. Where as other believe that the soul is separated from the body at the death time and is kept at the place and at the second coming of Jesus the body and the soul will be reunited and will be judged by God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work