• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss two criticisms of the argument from religious experience. To what extent is the argument successful in spite of these objections?

Extracts from this document...


1. Discuss two criticisms of the argument from religious experience. To what extent is the argument successful in spite of these objections? The use of religious experience to justify cognitive belief in a personal God has caused controversy amongst theists and atheists alike. The argument hinges on the principle of credulity; that is, consistency demands that we should treat apparently veridical religious sensory experiences the same as ordinary sensory experiences unless there are special considerations. This and the principle of testimony thus prove God's existence; if someone tells you that they have had such an experience, it is usually reasonable to believe them. Being non-empirical yet an inductive and a posteriori proof, this argument has attracted a variety of criticisms. One such challenge is the "Naturalistic Objection" which attempts to explain these supposed religious experiences atheistically, be it through psychology or socio-economics. ...read more.


an experience of "x" is genuine if the experience is caused by "x". 2. If there is a God, then S/He as the first cause is the initiator of events. 3. Therefore if there is a God, every experience of God is veridical. 4. Therefore the psychological origin of religious experience is not incompatible with the veridicality of religious experience. This seems an attractive stance, however Franks-Davis disputes God's place in this causal change. As the "first cause" of Aquinas' Cosmological argument, God appears less direct and personal in the chain of events. She simply proposes that one should reapply the "principle of credulity", one should assume that it is veridical unless under special circumstances. This objection does, however, highlight an important aspect of theistic faith. According to Vardy, religious experience should not be the sole reason for belief in God as an epistemological basis could be disproved. ...read more.


This particular rebuttal is modest at best as it hopes to eliminate any variation and subjectivity to its detriment. Hick asserts (with greater success) that although religions have different cultural perspectives, they each have an equally true idea of "the Real". This is in accordance with his idea of the world's "religious ambiguity"; as there is an epistemic distance between God and humans, all interpretations of an event are reasonable until they are eschatologically verified. The crucial difference between the argument from religious experience and others such as the teleological argument for several is that it goes beyond rhetoric; it uses what many theists see as explicit and incontrovertible proof for an interactive and personal God. To the individual who encounters the supernatural, the event serves to enhance their faith. Theists can use them to intellectually justify their beliefs as a part of Swinburne's cumulative case. An argument's worth is ultimately difficult to gauge because it depends whether one rates being able to convert atheists over inspiring organic faith or substantiating one's own beliefs. Religious Experience ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    providing proof of God's existence because mysticism is portrayed as "the closest that a human being can ever come to actually meeting the divine."8 Mystical experiences clearly do not provide evidence for the existence of religious experiences and therefore they support the quote.

  2. Select two theodicies. Comment on their success or otherwise. (13)

    If humans evolved from primitive creatures then there never was a time when they were perfect; good and morally enlightened beings. Also natural evils like volcanoes etc were in existence long before human beings existed. The third criticism is the idea of eternal punishment.

  1. Consider Crittically the Arguments against the DesignArgument Deomonstrating the Existence of God and assess ...

    Swinburne also argued that Hume is wrong to postulate more than one designer, as there is no need. John Stuart Mill, another philosopher who challenged the idea that evidence in the world proves the existence of a God of Classical Theism.

  2. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    So, the argument restated by Plantinga was, 1. There is a possible world where there is a being of maximal greatness. 2. It has maximal excellence. (as part of maximal greatness.) 3. If maximal excellence and maximal greatness exist in our world then, 4. There is a God.

  1. Looking at the views of two different religions about the same topic, 'life after ...

    and any one who follows Christ will be in heaven and everyone in there will be happy. Christians also believe that there is a time of judgment to be faced in bible this appears to a straight forward matter of dividing the good, bound for heaven, from the evil, bound

  2. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    There are many statements that we can make which, although they cannot be empirically verified, strictly speaking, are nonetheless meaningful: * Statements about emotions: 'Romeo and Juliet were greatly in love'. The effects of such emotion can be empirically perceived, but not strictly the thing 'love' in itself.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The same argument can be applied to the universe; it could have just been there. In a 1948 radio debate against Copelston continued to argue that the world had no explanation and it is a mistake to presume that it does.

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    The victim tries to explain way this happen and the only possibility he thought was that the machine must have been rigged. The kidnapper casts doubt on this suggestion saying, 'It is hardly surprising that the machine draws only aces of hearts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work