• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does God exist?

Extracts from this document...


Does God exist? Both St Thomas Aquinas' cosmological argument and William Paley's teleological argument both claim to prove that God exists. However both arguments are ambiguous meaning that they can be interpreted in more than one way and so you can study both arguments and come away with two sensible conclusions claiming that God does or doesn't exist. In the piece I am going to go through each argument and give reasons as to how each argument supports a belief in God or does not support a belief in God. The main thrust of the cosmological argument is that when asking about how the universe was created, it would simply be illogical to claim that something sprung from nothing and so something must have created it. However today we have evidence that the universe was caused by a big bang, but St Thomas Aquinas was not alive at the time of this discovery however he would have said that it cannot be an answer because then you would have to ask the question, what created the big bang? ...read more.


Some people actually think that it also makes sense to believe that the chain reaction of causes stretch endlessly backwards and there was no beginning at all. This idea supports a belief that there is no God. So overall by looking at the cosmological argument we can come away with a reason which supports a belief in God, but also a reason which does not support a belief in God and it is up to us whether we agree with the argument or disagree with the argument. Personally I believe that this argument supports a belief in God (the creator of the universe) because the idea that there was no beginning and the chain reaction of causes go on forever makes no sense to me at all, but the idea that there must have been a first cause makes sense. Next I will consider the teleological argument (the argument of design and purpose). The teleological argument starts by imagining you are walking across a field and you discover a watch. However this watch is very precise and complex and this shows evidence that it was designed very carefully for a purpose (which is to tell the time) ...read more.


You could instead say that the universe was created by a product of chance and that nature randomly 'plays' with the atoms through many different combinations until the right combination occurs. Therefore this argument produces a reason not to believe in God which is that the universe was created by chance and not a God. However my personal view on this is that this idea is illogical because if nature did things by chance, then the chance of everything turning out to be made just in the right way is very small and confuses me. So I think that Paley's arguments as well as Aquinas' argument both show stronger support in a belief of a God then a belief that there is not God. I believe that both arguments prove that God exist because they are logical and sensible arguments and that only people who already believe that God does not exist would use the two contradictory arguments which are that the chain reactions of causes stretch endlessly backwards and that the universe was created by a product of chance, to support their belief in there being no God without considering the logic behind them. Ram Aswani L4a ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Does God Exist?

    Atheists say that the big bang caused the universe; scientists have also proved this so the big bang theory explains how the universe was created so therefore proving that god did not create the universe so the theory does not need god as the first cause of the universe creation.

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    This argument would support Darwin's evolution theory that we, the most intelligent beings on the plant, originally came from some form of bacteria. This would go against the word of God that we are all 'unique.' Scientists and others believe in the 'Big Bang' theory.

  1. Does God Exist?

    The word 'God' may indeed include goodness, almightiness, wisdom etc, but not 'existence' and therefore the argument that it is possible to dispute the existence of god through the actual meaning of the word `god' is also completely flawed. I also strongly agree with Immanuel Kant.

  2. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    Religious Experiences Miracles A miracle is an event believed to have a supernatural cause. Even if people do not believe in such occurrences, they often use the word 'miracle' to describe an amazing thing, which seems to have violated a law of nature.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    This in turn implies that the value for the acceleration of the expansion or the deceleration of the contraction will be negative. This is because the acceleration of the expansion or the deceleration of the contraction is multiplied by -3 and the result must be equal to the positive number represented by the right side of the equation.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Dawkins has also recently written books to support Darwin's theory arguing that natural selection has given the illusion of design, and this has led to the mistake of the assumption that a designer was present. He rejects the design argument, arguing that the world was instead caused by random variations in the DNA molecules of any life form.


    This theory is called the cosmological argument and I think it is a good line of reasoning, but it's not really enough to prove that God exists and it probably wouldn't be enough to convert an atheist into a theist.

  2. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    "In revelation something pertaining to God is to man. (Schmaus.1968 Pp. 26-1). If so then divine revelation needs to be two way conversation as it has to involve an incarnation of God to reveal God in human terms. "In words and in images." (Schmaus.1968.Pp.26p2). These are recognised by the culture to which they are put and at the time they are put.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work