• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the play use every device to persuade us that Ken is right in 'Whose life is it anyway'.

Extracts from this document...


After reading the play I thought that Ken made the right decision. Therefore, in my view I think that the play does use every device to persuade us that Ken is right. Below there are some of the devices that persuade us Ken is right: - The first device is the title of the play, 'Whose life is it anyway'. For example when Ken doesn't want the injection, Dr. Emerson does not care that Ken doesn't want it, but does it because he thinks he knows best when it is actually Ken's life. Dr. Emerson does not want Ken to commit suicide and fights to try and keep Ken alive until the very end of the play. So, this means that Dr. Emerson is controlling Ken's life when it is actually Ken's choice. Another Device is Juxtaposition. This is putting two things together so they appear in contrast. For example, on an advert for a slimming meal, to show you what would happen if you started eating it they will split the screen in to two and have a picture of someone fat in the before part and someone thin is in the after screen. ...read more.


* He thinks he is useless- For example, banging his head against the wall would make no difference or the part where he says he was a skateboard. This is trying to show us that Ken knows that even if he stays alive it will make no difference. The main reason the author uses repetition is to get a point into our head, which will make it stick with you. If something keeps happening, you feel more sorry for Ken because it is not just happening once but over and over. A device is showing that Ken has lost the will to live. Ken asks and persuades Mr. Hill to represent him about wanting to be discharged, 'It is quite simple. I can't exist outside the hospital so they got to. This shows that Ken is able to face the truth as he talks to people about being discharged calmly, not shouting and screaming at Dr. Emerson, just calmly asking to be discharged. Ken is in a catch 22 situation. If Ken chooses to live he is sane, if he decides that he wants to die that is proof he is insane. ...read more.


when he's says Ken could be a tennis umpire. This brings light to the fact that if Ken is released, he will die. John is trying to make Ken laugh to see the funny side of things. I think that too many opposition points are omitted. For example, Mrs Boyle, who offers as an entice Ken to live "a comptometer" and who seems squeamish at the prospect of taking her bikini off-'Dr. Emerson tells me you don't want anymore treatment', while she could have more attractive ideas. One other device is the way in which Dr. Barr says he doesn't think that Dr. Barr thinks that Ken has made the wrong decision- Eden: ... 'do you think Mr. Harrison has made the right decision'. ... Dr. Barr: 'No, I thought he made the wrong decision. The reason this is done in the play is that Dr. Barr could have lied to the judge to keep him in the hospital but because he thinks Ken is wrong, it shows that he is more honest. Therefore I believe that Ken was right about being discharged and that the play uses every device to show you Ken is right. By Jack Darlington 04/05/07 Page 1 of 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    I believe the weaker sources of information were my newspaper articles. I believe this because not only was it very difficult to find a non-bias up-to-date but the articles didn't, and really couldn't or it would be seen as bias, to give any opinion and this is what I needed to help to prove or disprove my hypotenuse.

  2. How does the playwright Brian Clark present the conflict between Ken Harrison and his ...

    in his answer to Dr. Emerson's question "How are you this morning?" he says, "As you see, racing around all over the place." Almost every time we feel sarcasm humor in Ken's jokes. "You only grow the vegetables here, the vegetable store is somewhere else," his intelligence reveals itself in

  1. “Whose life is it anyway?” is not just a play about a man who ...

    For example a judge measures the truthfulness from deceiving lips of mankind and how innocent one really is where as citizens rely on the doctor's profession to rescue their lives. "A doctor cannot accept the choice for death; he's committed to life.

  2. Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his ...

    Finally once Ken has made his point sufficiently, the debate enters court proceedings, but because of Ken's condition, his room is transformed temporarily into a courtroom, where the debate is argued from the beginning so that the judge can pass a fair decision.

  1. Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own ...

    He is very capable of thinking and deciding on his own but due to his physical condition, the doctors see him differently and not like a normal person. For example when he is given injections, he decides against it but then he can't really stop being injected.

  2. Analysis of a Scene From Brookside

    Then we realise he has committed Euthanasia not an act of murder. I think the aims of the programme makers were to make the issue look as realistic as possible as if it was occurring in real life. To do this they have to set the scene using the main features i.e.

  1. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    current state, which other people do not see as they overlook it with professionalism. They bluntly refuse to accept his choice plainly because they think it is wrong. It is not right to not accept someone else's choice if we don not agree with it, and I think that is

  2. How does Mary Warnock persuade the readers to accept her viewpoint?

    This is a good choice of words, as not all people with terminal illness will know they are near death. It also generalises the population of terminal illness, as Warnock did not use he/she. She also uses very dramatic language such as "bleak, short future" This is another attempt at gaining sympathy from the readers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work