• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ethical Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Situation 1: Charity "We shouldn't need events like Comic Relief to make us give to charity." A Christian: Christians believe in following Christ's teaching and actions and since Christ taught and acted upon the giving of charity they would be with the giving of charity. They would think that we shouldn't need these events to raise money but since everyone is not of that mind they would still see it as a good way to raise charitable donations which could be put to Christian purposes. "The Lord has no favourites at the poor man's expense, but listens to his prayer when he is wronged" (Eccus 35:13). A Buddhist: A Buddhist would, I think see events like Comic Relief as a good way to raise money and a good way to gain and distribute good Karma leading to a better life after reincarnation. They would think the nature of the event would not particularly matter if it is for a good cause. Buddhist would believe that we should not need these events as it should be in our nature and part of the path to enlightenment to give to charity. ...read more.

Middle

A Buddhist: A Buddhist view on this subject is a bit mixed on this subject but they would overall think of it an unethical for they think that sex should not be just for pleasure hence one of the 5 precepts I undertake to abstain to the misuse of the senses meaning you should not use an act of reproduction for pure pleasure for it is just a distraction Kant: Kant would be against this subject he says in his 'lecture on ethics' (1770) If a man wishes to satisfy his desire and a woman hers, they stimulate each others desire there inculcations meet, but their object is not human nature but sex, and each of them dishonours the human nature of the other. Meaning that sex should again only be for procreation he thought that sex should be within a set of rules promoting intrinsic worth and dignity not by lust so it should not be to pleasure each other and if it was out of marriage it was even worse you can see this from 'Sex is bad except when it brings out intrinsic worth and dignity' sex within marriage. ...read more.

Conclusion

country and for that matter to fund the country I think he would believe that if we agreed to go war and if it were in our policy to fund it we should. He, I think would say regardless of our wills and desire we should fully commit to something that we, as a country, have committed to. A Utilitarian: A Utilitarian would very much sympathise with the government for they are stretching the budget to get the best for all or the greatest good for the greatest number they would see what was trying to be done for the country but I think they would partially agree in putting funding more in to the army but would see that there would just have to be cutting elsewhere Me: I think that such controversial subject's of war that have been so argued and debated should be fully funded and backed although that if we were to fund there would be downsides such as cutting elsewhere or higher taxes that would be unbelievably attacked and criticises. And the people in high power could not do this without putting there political positions in serious risk. ?? ?? ?? ?? Joe Brann Thursday, 06 March 2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    I believe that the majority of newspapers were a weaker way of collecting information because there is only a small minority of newspapers that are free from bias and then there may also be the bias views of the writer in the article and it can be hard to wade

  2. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    It isnt wrong to help the dying to die , because they are actually dying Other people completely disagree and say that all euthanasia is killing and that killing is forbidden not only in the law but in some religious scriptures.

  1. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    dignity of a human person, a crime against life, and an attack on humanity. It may happen that, by reason of prolonged and barely tolerable pain, for deeply personal or other reasons, people may be led to believe that they can legitimately ask for death or to obtain it for others.

  2. Euthanasia - Christian view point in three questions and answers

    They believed that all life was sacred and none was to be taken away or given up, doing so would mean permanent murder to one's self, meaning it would a grave sin. They believe all human beings should be restricted from causing or having an early death from to any person.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work