• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Euthanasia - How valuable is human life?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Euthanasia: How Valuable Is Human Life? By: Todd A.M. DeCosta April 25, 2002 Dr. John Farnum Ethics 220 When my grandfather had been diagnosed with prostate cancer and was not responding well to the treatment, I began to realize the importance of sustaining life. After discontinuing his treatment, I noticed that my grandfather's body was getting weaker and weaker. Everyone in the family could notice the pain he was enduring just to walk across the room. The family would willingly insist on retrieving whatever it was he desired at that moment, but he would not allow it. He would use all his energy to go across the room to obtain whatever it was that he wanted on his own. The family, including myself, thought that he was just being his stubborn self. He later lost the ability to walk and became bed stricken for his last couple of months until he passed away in his own bed in the house he brought up his family in. It wasn't until after his passing that I realized the significance of his "stubbornness." I noticed it was not that he was stubborn; it was the fact that he saw the importance in being with his family to the end. I realized that he could have just given up after the treatment wasn't working, and could have stayed in a hospital for the remainder of his life. ...read more.

Middle

The second perspective Callahan speaks of is the moral perspective. This perspective emphasizes on the differences between physical causality and moral culpability. The physical causality can be described as being the human involvement, or the action of external nature, in the situation. The moral culpability is simply the moral responsibility of the one contributing the external involvement in the situation. For instance, the actions of the physician of the individual being treated is an example of the physical causality, and the physician's thought of taking the individual's life is the moral culpability, or responsibility. Callahan, on the other hand, mentions that if the physical causality and the moral culpability crossed paths then there would be no difference whether an individual is killed or allowed to die. The last perspective, the medical perspective, views the physician, or any medical professional in charge of an individual's treatment, as curing and comforting rather than killing the individual. This distinction's premise is the misuse of knowledge physicians have. The knowledge provided for physicians is given for the primary reason of sustaining life not taking the life away from an individual. Lastly, Peter Singer introduced the idea that voluntary euthanasia can be morally justified in cases involving individuals suffering from painful, incurable conditions. Singer uses sources such as preference utilitarianism, the theory of rights, and the overall respect for autonomy as the basis for proving his argument. Simply, Singer considers the fact that the individual has the right to waive his/her own rights if the individual decides to do so. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, society should take into consideration selfish family members who might be thinking of financial benefits with the death of the individual. In closing, take into consideration some of the following subjects. National agencies such as the American Medical Association have publicly announced against the practice of mercy killing. Should professionals that do otherwise be taken from their professions all together? Or is it an agreeable thought that the professional be fined or suspended for a period of time as is usual practice now? As mentioned earlier, professionals in the medical world are provided special knowledge to sustain human life. The practice of euthanasia seems to cross that boundary by allowing professionals to use the knowledge given to them for removing human life. State laws such as Oregon's Death with Dignity Act approves of doctor assisted suicide for terminally ill. Does this not contradict the AMA's statement, "the intentional termination of the life of one human being by another-mercy killing-is contrary to that for which the medical profession stands?" This situation could be rather confusing for a professional to make a deontological decision. When government laws, or rules, contradict with a national agencies rules, which set of rules is the professional to base his decision on? This shows that not only are professionals confused about the morality of euthanasia, but so is the government. The government should help professionals in the medical field by providing a firm set of rules, in which professionals may have the chance to base deontological decisions upon. White, James E. Contemporary Moral Problems 6th Edition. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company). pp. 206-238. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    a bias sounding question, where as a closed question has to have a slight bit of bias because you have to side them one way to ask if the respondent agrees of disagrees. I had more concerns about the closed questions than the open questions as they can seem bias and influence people's answers.

  2. Euthanasia -Humane or insane?

    What they cannot control, however is the loss of personal dignity and that is very difficult criterion that no patient can comment on". In the medical world, there are divisions on euthanasia, some are totally for, yet others are totally against the idea.

  1. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    ('The Moral Maze,' by David Cook). Jews have very similar beliefs to Muslims. This is because they believe that people should be grateful for the gift of life, and lives are not to be disposed of as we please. As with Christians, they believe that man is made in God's image (as it is included in the Old Testament).

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    They also think that both the body and spirit of the patient needs care and love. Dame Cicely Saunders is the Founder and Chairman of St. Christopher's Hospice in South London. As a Christian, she believes that death is not the end of everything, but a brief stopping place on a journey.

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    "If you want peace you take the pill." Ken is trying to be convinced that the pill will give him peace, which his carers obviously think he needs but for him it would make his situation worse. Although Ken is alive, he has no quality of life. If nature had taken its course with not so much medical

  2. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    It does not even condemn the four cases that it records of suicide: Saul (1 Sam 31:4), Anthithopel (2 Sam 17:23), Samuel (Judges 16:30) and Judas (Matthew 27:5) Christians, however, have two other components for the sanctity of life argument. The first is that suffering is part of God's plan.

  1. I believe it is the right of any human being to be totally in ...

    I think that so long as you are given a confirmation from two or three seperate doctors that say you WILL die anyway, why lie there in agony, causing yourself and your relatives so much grief? I know what I'd do, whether I was "permitted" or not...(And God help anyone that charged my family or doctor for helping me...)

  2. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    While presumably mercy killing as been practiced throughout history and in different cultures, attempts to make euthanasia legal have been made only fairly recently. In 1936, legalisation of euthanasia was defeated and still today some similar attempts have also failed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work