• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Euthanasia is the deliberate killing of a person for the benefit of that person.

Extracts from this document...


What is Euthanasia: Euthanasia is the deliberate killing of a person for the benefit of that person. In most cases euthanasia is carried out because the person who dies asks for it, but there are cases called euthanasia where a person can't make such a request. A person who undergoes euthanasia is usually terminally ill, but there are other situations in which some people want euthanasia. What is euthanasia? Euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. Voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed has requested to be killed. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed made no request and gave no consent. Involuntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed made an expressed wish to the contrary. Assisted suicide is when someone provides an individual with the information, guidance, and means to take his or her own life with the intention that they will be used for this purpose. When it is a doctor who helps another person to kill himself it is called "Physician-assisted suicide". Euthanasia by action is intentionally causing a person's death by performing an action such as by giving a lethal injection. Euthanasia by omission is intentionally causing death by not providing necessary and ordinary (usual and customary) ...read more.


Almost three out of four doctors (74%) would refuse to perform assisted suicide if it were legalised. A clear majority (56%) also consider that it would be impossible to set safe bounds to euthanasia as compared to 37% who disagree. In addition there are marked differences in attitudes to hospice and geriatric care between doctors opposed to euthanasia and those who support such a policy. These facts emerge from a major survey completed by 986 doctors by the Opinion Research Business (ORB) over a two-week period - March 26-April 9, 2003. To ensure impartiality, ORB had the final decision on all questions. The survey was administered by the foremost medical internet company in the UK, Doctors.Net.UK, who contacted 9,000 doctors and medical specialists, including those in palliative care, oncology, psychiatry, geriatrics, general surgery and general practice. There was an 11% response which is typical for an Internet survey of this nature. The survey was commissioned by Right To Life and the initial results were launched at a press conference held by the All-Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group in the House of Commons on Tuesday, May 13. Chairman of the parliamentary group, Jim Dobbin MP (Labour - Heywood & Middleton) said: "We welcome these initial results. They are very much in keeping with a survey published in Hospital Doctor (13th March, 2003) ...read more.


Nonetheless, a substantial minority of doctors were concerned about possible pressures from families and colleagues if euthanasia and assisted suicide were legalised. Nearly half (47%) felt that if euthanasia and assisted suicide were made legal they would not be confident of being able to exercise their judgment without pressure from relatives. 29% were confident and 24% did not know. On the other hand over half of doctors (58%) were confident of being able to exercise their judgment free from beneficiaries. 29% were not confident and 12% did not know. A disturbing figure was that relating to pressure from colleagues. Overall 43% were not confident that they would be able to exercise their judgment free from pressure from medical and nursing colleagues. 28% were confident and a further 28% did not know. A majority of doctors (57%) felt that they could withstand pressures resulting from NHS resources. In comparison 28% were not confident and 15% did not know. Palliative care doctors showed the most concern on this issue. Although a majority of doctors were confident that they would be able to detect whether a request for assisted suicide was part of a depressive illness - 10% very confident and 53% quite confident - a substantial minority lacked such confidence. 30% said they were not very confident and 7% not at all confident. Not surprisingly, psychiatrists were the most confident (86%) as compared with 63% of general practitioners ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Legislation allowing mentally competent, terminally ill adults who are suffering unbearably to request medical assistance to die would better protect patients, their families, and doctors." 7 In the current situation where assisted suicide is illegal there is more danger and risk to the patients when Euthanasia is carried out because

  2. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    little or no chance of recovery is now commonplace in most hospitals. Patients are kept alive with sophisticated machinery and the body and its organs can be sustained for indefinite periods. The prohibitive financial burden placed on a patient's family and society is another dimension of this issue.

  1. Christian Perspectives - Euthanasia is the intentional killing of a person.

    This is called 'Physician assisted suicide'. Doctors know a lot more information about ending your life painlessly. This is why physician assisted suicide is more common. In the United Kingdom euthanasia is illegal, they use the same law as for murder.

  2. To what Extent was Hitler’s Euthanasia policy a distinct “Nazi” Policy?

    On arrival to their destination they would be told to participate in a physical evaluation and the people that had valuables, gold teeth etc, were marked in a red cross to be used later for scientific research and thus were brought elsewhere.

  1. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    The conscience may not have 'spoken out' originally if the friends and relatives were wrapped up in the pain and suffering of their dying loved one in the first place. This does, however, entirely depend on the principles that operate within the conscience.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    They also support natural law and sanctity of life, that life is sacred, it's created by God, we're all images of God, we're all gifts from God who should be preserved and cherished. Only God can take away our life.

  1. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    as the absence of the use of force or the threat of force to make someone do what they would otherwise be unwilling to do. They argue that it is a freedom of choice. Autonomy is defined as the presence of options.

  2. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    Liberty is 2the main means by which a person determines his morality and values, existential philosophy is the one factor which makes humans different from all other things and Moral Law ensures that individuals are respected for their own sake and protects them from exploitation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work