• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Euthanasia is the deliberate killing of a person for the benefit of that person.

Extracts from this document...


What is Euthanasia: Euthanasia is the deliberate killing of a person for the benefit of that person. In most cases euthanasia is carried out because the person who dies asks for it, but there are cases called euthanasia where a person can't make such a request. A person who undergoes euthanasia is usually terminally ill, but there are other situations in which some people want euthanasia. What is euthanasia? Euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. Voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed has requested to be killed. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed made no request and gave no consent. Involuntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed made an expressed wish to the contrary. Assisted suicide is when someone provides an individual with the information, guidance, and means to take his or her own life with the intention that they will be used for this purpose. When it is a doctor who helps another person to kill himself it is called "Physician-assisted suicide". Euthanasia by action is intentionally causing a person's death by performing an action such as by giving a lethal injection. Euthanasia by omission is intentionally causing death by not providing necessary and ordinary (usual and customary) ...read more.


Almost three out of four doctors (74%) would refuse to perform assisted suicide if it were legalised. A clear majority (56%) also consider that it would be impossible to set safe bounds to euthanasia as compared to 37% who disagree. In addition there are marked differences in attitudes to hospice and geriatric care between doctors opposed to euthanasia and those who support such a policy. These facts emerge from a major survey completed by 986 doctors by the Opinion Research Business (ORB) over a two-week period - March 26-April 9, 2003. To ensure impartiality, ORB had the final decision on all questions. The survey was administered by the foremost medical internet company in the UK, Doctors.Net.UK, who contacted 9,000 doctors and medical specialists, including those in palliative care, oncology, psychiatry, geriatrics, general surgery and general practice. There was an 11% response which is typical for an Internet survey of this nature. The survey was commissioned by Right To Life and the initial results were launched at a press conference held by the All-Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group in the House of Commons on Tuesday, May 13. Chairman of the parliamentary group, Jim Dobbin MP (Labour - Heywood & Middleton) said: "We welcome these initial results. They are very much in keeping with a survey published in Hospital Doctor (13th March, 2003) ...read more.


Nonetheless, a substantial minority of doctors were concerned about possible pressures from families and colleagues if euthanasia and assisted suicide were legalised. Nearly half (47%) felt that if euthanasia and assisted suicide were made legal they would not be confident of being able to exercise their judgment without pressure from relatives. 29% were confident and 24% did not know. On the other hand over half of doctors (58%) were confident of being able to exercise their judgment free from beneficiaries. 29% were not confident and 12% did not know. A disturbing figure was that relating to pressure from colleagues. Overall 43% were not confident that they would be able to exercise their judgment free from pressure from medical and nursing colleagues. 28% were confident and a further 28% did not know. A majority of doctors (57%) felt that they could withstand pressures resulting from NHS resources. In comparison 28% were not confident and 15% did not know. Palliative care doctors showed the most concern on this issue. Although a majority of doctors were confident that they would be able to detect whether a request for assisted suicide was part of a depressive illness - 10% very confident and 53% quite confident - a substantial minority lacked such confidence. 30% said they were not very confident and 7% not at all confident. Not surprisingly, psychiatrists were the most confident (86%) as compared with 63% of general practitioners ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Legislation allowing mentally competent, terminally ill adults who are suffering unbearably to request medical assistance to die would better protect patients, their families, and doctors." 7 In the current situation where assisted suicide is illegal there is more danger and risk to the patients when Euthanasia is carried out because

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    Nor should it be used to cover the giving of drugs for the relief of pain and other distress in cases where there is a risk. (3) It should be the aim to improve the care of the dying in hospitals and hospices.

  1. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    Western religions tend to believe in one God, and according to religious scriptures, God has commanded that innocent beings should never be killed. This fits in with the idea that most religions believe that human life is sacred, as it was created by God, and is a gift from God.

  2. Choose a case which you consider to be of crucial importance for medical ethics ...

    It is for this very reason I believe the case was decided how it was. On the face of it it would appear that the arguments put forward, or at least some are rights the convention confer upon individuals are worthy of note, and their consideration by the ECHR reflects this.

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    The second part of the position is Destiny. If God is the author of life then it follows that He is the one who determines when it should end. Thus in all ordinary circumstances it is not up to the individual whether he or she might add or subtract from his or her life.

  2. Should euthanasia be legalised?

    In this way no territory can act in isolation. The decisions we make might have implications for other nations, not only for their citizens who choose euthanasia tourism, but also for future changes in their own laws. Any state considering a change in its laws in this regard has a

  1. Eastenders dealt with the issue of euthanasia in a past show where Dot is ...

    states that 'The world and all that is in it belong to God'. However, there are situations where patients who are suffering from illnesses that cannot be cured and are being kept alive by treatments with unpleasant side effects and are brain dead.

  2. Should Euthanasia be Legalised?

    The person's clothes were on fire and the fire brigade had not yet arrived. This person was screaming for help and a passer notices the person and realises that the person will suffer agonising pain from burns. He has a rifle with him and shoots the person dead.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work